Advertisement

Corruption vs Integrity: Comparative Insights on the Problematic of Legitimacy

  • Italo Pardo
Chapter
Part of the Political Corruption and Governance book series (PCG)

Abstract

My interest in corruption and in its tension with integrity is in many ways a by-product of my interest in how dominant groups manage power and relate with the rest of society. Doubtful that among the élite (as among the non-élite) moral themes are basically an opportunistic veneer for the pursuit of profit (monetary, political, and symbolic), I have pursued a complex view of the relationship between the élites’ moralities and behaviors (Pardo, 1996; see also Prato, 2000a, b); the sine qua non being that to understand such a relationship and its practical ramifications we need to penetrate empirically the nature of voluntary action and, therefore, how concepts of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ and ‘good’ and ‘evil’ are understood and made to operate. Over the years, this research direction has brought to light highly problematic issues in the democratic model of associated life, which I address in this chapter, drawing on historical and contemporary evidence from Great Britain and Italy and on complementary comparative insights.1

Keywords

Public Life Public Body Corrupt Practice Political Corruption Legal Pluralism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatas, H.S. (1968), The sociology of Corruption: The Nature, Function, Causes and Prevention of Corruption (Singapore: D. Moore Press).Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, P. (1969), Stratagems and Spoils (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  3. Bax, M. (1976), Harpstrings and Confessions. Machine-Style Politics in the Irish Republic (Amsterdam: Van Gorcum).Google Scholar
  4. Blakenburg, E., Staudhammer, R. and Steinert H. (1989), ‘Political Scandals and Corruption: Issues in West Germany,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 913–932.Google Scholar
  5. Block, A. (1996), ‘American Corruption and the Decline of the Progressive Ethos,’ in M. Levi and D. Nelken (eds): 18–35.Google Scholar
  6. Bufi, P. (2007), ‘Rifiuti: Bassolino va processato,’ Corriere della Sera, 1 August.Google Scholar
  7. Burman, S.B. and Harrel-Bond, B.E, (1979). ‘Introduction,’ in S.B. Burman and B.E. Harrel-Bond (eds): 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. Burman, S.B. and Harrel-Bond, B.E. (eds) (1979), The Imposition of Law (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  9. Chiariello, P. (2008), Monnezzopoli: La Grande Truffa (Naples: Tullio Pironti).Google Scholar
  10. Cordova, A. and D’Amato, A. (2000), ‘Pubblica amministrazione: il controllo come strumento di prevenzione della condotta illecita,’ in I. Pardo (ed.), 155–159.Google Scholar
  11. D’Avanzo, G. (2008), ‘Intervista al sindaco di Napoli Rosa Russo Iervolino,’ Repubblica, December 5.Google Scholar
  12. Della Corte, M. (2007), Bassolino: Amici e Compagni (Naples: Controcorrente).Google Scholar
  13. Della Porta, D. and Meny, Y (eds) (1997), Democracy and Corruption in Europe (London and Washington: Pinter).Google Scholar
  14. Demarco, M. (2007), L’altra metà della storia: Spunti e Riflessioni su Napoli da Lauro a Bassolino (Naples: Guida).Google Scholar
  15. Demarco, M. (2009), Bassa Italia: L’Antimeridionalismo della Sinistra Meridionale (Naples: Guida).Google Scholar
  16. Di Feo, G. (2008), ‘Compagni Spa,’ L’Espresso, 49: 58–66.Google Scholar
  17. Doig, A, (1996), ‘From Lynskey to Nolan: The Corruption of British Politics and Public Service?’ in M. Levi and D. Nelken (eds): 36–56.Google Scholar
  18. de la Feld, G., . (2000), ‘Imposizione normativa all’impresa: quando la legge incoraggia i comportamenti corrotti,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 139–144.Google Scholar
  19. Fiume Mariniello, L. (2000), ‘Revisione interna ed esterna: anomalie comportamentali,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 145–154.Google Scholar
  20. Friedrich, C. (1989), ‘Corruption Concepts in Historical Perspective,’ in A. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 15–24.Google Scholar
  21. Gill, T. (2000), ‘Unconventional Moralitites: Tolerance and Containment in Urban Japan,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 229–256.Google Scholar
  22. Giordano, A. and Tarro, G. (2012), Campania: Terra di Veleni (Naples: Dlibri).Google Scholar
  23. Gledhill, J. (2004), ‘Corruption as the Mirror of the State in Latin America,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 155–179.Google Scholar
  24. Gupta, A. (1995), ‘Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State,’ American Ethnologist, 22(2): 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence & Wishart).Google Scholar
  26. Harrison, E. (2004), ‘The “Cancer of Corruption”,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 135–153.Google Scholar
  27. Heidenheimer, A., Johnston, M. and Le Vine, V.T. (1989), ‘Terms, Concepts, and Definitions: An Introduction,’ in A. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 3–14.Google Scholar
  28. Heidenheimer, A., Johnston, M. and LeVine, V.T. (eds) (1989), Political Corruption: A Handbook (New Brunswick: Transaction Books).Google Scholar
  29. Humphrey, C. and Sneath, D. (2004), ‘Shanghaied by the Bureaucracy: Bribery and Post-Soviet Officialdom in Russia and Mongolia,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 85–99.Google Scholar
  30. Iovene, B. and Lombardi, N. (2008), Campania Infelix (Milan: Rizzoli).Google Scholar
  31. Kramer, J.M. (1989), ‘Political Corruption in the USSR,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 449–465.Google Scholar
  32. King, P. (1989), ‘Socioeconomic Development and Cormpt Campaign Practices in England,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 233–250.Google Scholar
  33. Klaveren van, J. (1989), ‘Corruption as a Historical Phenomenon,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 73–86.Google Scholar
  34. Levi, M and Nelken, D. (eds) (1996), The Corruption of Politics and the Politics of Corruption (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  35. Lloyd-Bostock, S.M.A. (1979), ‘Explaining Compliance with Imposed Law,’ in S.B. Burman and B.E. Harrel-Bond (eds): 9–25.Google Scholar
  36. Lowenstein, D.H. (1989), ‘Legal Efforts to Define Political Bribery,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 29–38.Google Scholar
  37. Lukes, S. (1991), Moral Conflict and Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, T.H. (1950), Citizenship, Social Class and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Mazzoni, C. (2000), ‘L’impresa tra rispetto della legge e eccessi normativi: la fiducia el’operatività come deterrenti della corruzione,’ Sviluppo Economico, 4(3): 89–102.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, A. (2000), ‘La realtà della corruzione e l’inadeguatezza normative,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 139–143.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, A. (2004). ‘Corruption Between Morality and Legitimacy in the Context of Globlization,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 53–67.Google Scholar
  42. Montesquieu, Ch. De Secondat (1989). The Spirit of the Laws, edited by A.M. Cohler, B.C, Miller and H.S. Stone (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  43. Nilsson, H. (1994), ‘Substantive Criminal Law: Corruption and Money-Laundering,’ in D.V. Trang (ed.): 89–104.Google Scholar
  44. Paravia, A. (2000), ‘La corruzione e la morale d’impresa/ in I. Pardo (ed.): 115–226.Google Scholar
  45. Pardo, I. (1996), Managing Existence in Naples: Morality, Action and Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pardo, I. (2000a), ‘Introduction — Morals of Legitimacy: interplay between respon-sibility, Authority and Trust,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 1–26.Google Scholar
  47. Pardo, I. (2000b), ‘When Power Lacks Legitimacy: Relations of Politics and Law to Society in Italy,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 83–106.Google Scholar
  48. Pardo, I. (ed.) (2000a), Comportamenti Illegittimi e Corruzione (Rome: Sviluppo Economico).Google Scholar
  49. Pardo, I. (ed.) (2000c), Corruzione, Moralità, Legge (Rome: Sviluppo Economico).Google Scholar
  50. Pardo, I. (2001) Elite senza fiducia: ideologie, etiche di potere, legittimità (Catanzaro: Rubbettino).Google Scholar
  51. Pardo, I. (2004), ‘Where It Hurts: An Italian Case of Graded and Stratified Corruption,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 33–52.Google Scholar
  52. Pardo, I. (2010), ‘Italian Rubbish: Elemental Issues of Citizenship and Governance,’ in I. Pardo and G.B. Prato (eds): 25–45.Google Scholar
  53. Pardo, I. (2012), ‘Entrepreneurialism in Naples: Formality and Informality’, Urbanities, 2(1): 30–45, available at: http://www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com/journal2/index.html.
  54. Pardo, I. (2013), ‘Who is Corrupt? Anthropological Reflections on the Moral, the Criminal and the Borderline,’ Human Affairs, 3(2): 124–147.Google Scholar
  55. Pardo, I. (ed.) (2004), Between Morality and the Law: Corruption, Anthropology and Comparative Society (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  56. Pardo, I. and Prato, G.B. (2005). The Fox-Hunting Debate in the United Kingdom: A Puritan Legacy? Human Ecology Review, 12(2): 142–154.Google Scholar
  57. Parry, J. (2000), ‘The “Crisis of Corruption” and “the Idea of India”: A Worm’s Eye View,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 27–55.Google Scholar
  58. Pitch, T. (1983), ‘Sociology and Law in Italy,’ Journal of Law and Society, (10)1: 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prato, G.B. (1993), ‘Political Decision-Making: Environmentalism, Ethics and Popular Participation in Italy,’ in K. Milton (ed.): 174–188.Google Scholar
  60. Prato, G.B. (2000), ‘The Cherries of the Mayor: Degrees of Morality and Responsibility in Local Italian Administration,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 57–82.Google Scholar
  61. Prato, G.B. (2004), ‘The Devil is not as Wicked as People Believe, Neither is the Albanian’: Corruption Between Moral Discourses and National Identity,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 69–84.Google Scholar
  62. Rigi, J. (2004), ‘Corruption in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 101–118.Google Scholar
  63. Roodhouse, M. (2002), ‘The 1948 Belcher Affair and Lynskey Tribunal,’ Twentieth Century British History, 13(1): 348–411.Google Scholar
  64. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1989), ‘Corruption and the Private Sector,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 661–683.Google Scholar
  65. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999), Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruffo, A. (2000a), ‘L’informazione corrotta,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 121–124.Google Scholar
  67. Ruffo, A. (2000b), ‘Corruzione nella stampa tra etica e opinione pubblica,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 239–244.Google Scholar
  68. Ruffo, A. (2011), ‘After the Murdoch Affair: A Better Ethics?’ Urbanities, (1)1: 60–65, available at http://www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com.Google Scholar
  69. Ruggiero, V. (1996), Organized and Corporate Crime in Europe (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar
  70. Saltman, M. (1985), “’The Law is a Ass”: An Anthropological Appraisal,’ in J. Overing (ed.): 226–239.Google Scholar
  71. Scott, J.C. (1972), Comparative Political Corruption (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  72. Scott, J.C. (1989), ‘Handling Historical Comparisons Cross-Nationally,’ in A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V.T. Le Vine (eds): 129–143.Google Scholar
  73. Sedlenieks, K. (2004), ‘Rotten Talk: Corruption as Part of a Discourse in Contemporary Latvia,’ in I. Pardo (ed.): 119–134.Google Scholar
  74. Tamanaha, B.Z. (1993), ‘The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism,’ Journal of Law and Society, 20(2): 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Torsello, D. (2012). The New Environmentalism? Civil Society and Corruption in the Enlarged EU (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  76. Weber, M. (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  77. Weber, M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (edited by G. Roth & C. Wittich) 2 vols (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  78. Winnet, R. and Rayner, G. (2009), No Expenses Spared (London: Telegraph Books).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Italo Pardo 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Italo Pardo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations