Abstract
The concepts and the practices of colonialism and imperialism have fascinated scholars for almost a century and their relevance continues. They have myriad shades and have shaped human life as nothing else has done so far. Concepts such as modernity, new socio-economic forces, techno-scientific changes and globalization are in some way or another related to these phenomena. It is no coincidence that during the era of the Scientific Revolution, different trading companies were established to undertake colonial expansion. Flag followed trade and both recognized the relevance of techno-scientific knowledge. The era of exploration had its own romance. Later on, institutions were established and professionalization gradually came. It was a long and arduous process. The colonizer and the colonized cannot be seen only in terms of binaries. How should one characterize this delicate and dialectic relationship: in terms of core–periphery, network, web, circuits, persuasion — coercion, ‘gentlemanly’, ‘traditional’ imperial history or ‘new’ imperial history? Historical facts, dug honestly from different sites, do not seem to support deterministic or essentializing understandings. The very nature of historical construction invites one to look at cross-currents and fluidity. Colonialism as a process is no exception to this. Similarly, scientific knowledge, like colonialism itself, is no monolith: both needed and aided each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Lester (2006), ‘Imperial Circuits and Networks: Geographies of the British Empire’, History Compass, 4(1): 124–141.
R. MacLeod (2000), ‘Introduction: Nature and Empire’, Osiris, 15: 5.
D. Kumar (ed.) (1991), Science and Empire. Delhi: Anamika Pub.
P. Petitjean (ed.) (1992), Science and Empires: Historical Studies about Scientific Development and European Expansion. Dordrecht: Springer.
D. R. Headrick (1981), The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press; R. MacLeod (1982), ‘On Visiting the Moving Metropolis: Reflections on the Architecture of Imperial Science’, Historical Records of Australian Science, 3: n.p.;
I. Inkster (1985), ‘Scientific Enterprise and the Colonial Model’, Social Studies of Science, XV: 677–704.
As Harris points out, ‘in both the linguistic and Latourian sense, Jesuits were masters of translation’. S. J. Harris (2005), ‘Jesuit Scientific Activity in the Overseas Missions 1540–1773’, Isis, 96(1): 71–79.
L. Schiebinger and C. Swan (2005), Colonial Botany. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 12.
C. A. Bayly (1999), Empire and Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 260.
L. Pyenson (1989), The Empire of Reason: Exact Sciences in Indonesia, 1850–1950. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
D. Kumar (2006), Science and the Raj, 2nd edn. Delhi: Oxford University Press, p. 17.
Latour defines translation as ‘a stronghold established in such a way that, whatever people do and wherever they go, they have the pass through the contender’s position and to help him further his own interests’. B. Latour (1988), The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 65–66.
For stimulating details, see G. Prakash (1999), Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
For details, see, H. K. Bhabha (ed.) (1990), Nation and Narration. London: Routledge.
Bridgehead is a ‘hinge or interface between the metropole and a local periphery … it might be a commercial, settler, missionary or proconsul presence or a combination of all four. It might be a decaying factory on a torrid coast or, at its grandest, the Company Behadur.’ J. Darwin (1997) ‘Imperialism and the Victorians: The Dynamics of Territorial Expansion’, English Historical Review, 112(447): 629–642.
K. Raj (2006), Relocating Modern Science. Delhi: Permanent Black, p. 58. Raj cites the example of Rumphius who clearly mentioned in his Herbarium Amboinense (1663–1697) that his work was meant for the ‘use and service to those who live in the East Indies’.
L. Schiebinger (2004), Plants and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 15, 27.
An excellent account of the travellers’ perceptions is given in S. Sangwan (1985), ‘European Impressions and Interpretation of Indian Science and Technology’, Social Science Probings, II(3): 353–377.
R. Grove (1988), ‘Indigenous Knowledge and the Significance of SouthWest India for Portuguese and Dutch Constructions of Tropical Nature’, in R. Grove, V. Damodaran and S. Sangwan, Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and Southeast Asia. Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–207.
R. Drayton (2000), Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial Britain, and the ‘Improvement’ of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
G. P. Majumdar (1927), Vanaspati: Plants and Plant Life as in Indian Treatises and Traditions. Calcutta: Calcutta University, pp. 220–224. See also
G. P. Majumdar (1935), Upavana Vinoda: a Sanskrit Treatise on Arbori and Horticulture. Calcutta: Calcutta University.
I. Wladimir (1926), Concise Descriptive Catalogue of the Persian Manuscripts in the Curzon Collection of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Calcutta: Calcutta University.
S. Sangwan (1983), ‘Plant Colonialism’, Proc. of the XLIV Session of the Indian History Congress. Burdwan, pp. 414–424.
W. R. Dawson (1958), The Banks Letters. London: British Museum.
G. Cannon (1964), Oriental Jones. Delhi: Asia Pub. House, pp. 125, 148, 182.
A David Arnold puts it, ‘Wallich was no grand theorizer. He showed little interest in plant geography, or anatomy, or in the more philosophical issue of the distribution or variation of species that later intrigued Joseph Hooker and fuelled his discussions with Darwin and Lyell. Wallich’s significance was as a key figure in the patronage networks … as a scientific entrepreneur, the man who, more than any other single individual, controlled and delivered to the West, India’s vast botanical riches.’ D. Arnold (2005), The Tropics and the Travelling Gaze: India, Landscape, and Science 1800–1856. Delhi: Permanent Black, p. 155.
I. H. Burkill (1965), Chapters on the History of Botany in India. Delhi: Govt. Press, p. 91.
Anon. (1856), Calcutta Review, 26 (June), pp. 363–365. As a plant-hunter, J. D. Hooker was supreme. He became the most outstanding geo-botanist of the century. P. Raby (1996), Bright Paradise: Victorian Scientific Travellers. Princeton: Yale University Press, pp. 122–147.
H. Santapau (1958), History of Botanical Researches in India, Burma and Ceylon, Pt. II. Bangalore, p. 5.
J. F. Royle (1847), A Manual of Materia Medica and Therapeutics. London: John Churchill.
R. Grove (1995), Green Imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 486.
Arun Agrawal (1995), ‘Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge’, Development and Change, 26: 413–439.
P. Chakrabarti (2006), ‘Medicine Amidst War and Commerce in Eighteenth Century Madras’, Bulletin of History of Medicine, 80: 1–38.
S. Dubow (2006), A Commonwealth of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14, 99.
H. J. Noltie (2002), The Dapuri Drawings: Alexander Gibson and the Bombay Botanic Gardens. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden, pp. 79–80;
H. J. Noltie (2007), Robert Wight and the Botanic Drawings of Rungiah and Govindoo. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.
P. Parthasarathi (2011), Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–192.
P. Chakrabarti (2010), ‘Networks of Medicine’, in A. Bandyopadhyay (ed.), Science and Society in India1750–2000. Delhi: Manohar, p. 65.
T. Ballantyne (2002), Orientalism and Race. London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 39.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Deepak Kumar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, D. (2015). Botanical Explorations and the East India Company: Revisiting ‘Plant Colonialism’. In: Damodaran, V., Winterbottom, A., Lester, A. (eds) The East India Company and the Natural World. Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427274_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49109-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42727-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)