Skip to main content

Revisiting CSC Practice

  • Chapter
  • 503 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change ((PSCSC))

Abstract

Over the past two decades, CSC has been practised under a wide variety of names, such as Communication for Development (abbreviated in different ways such as ComDev, C4D and DevComm), Information, Communication and Technology for Development (ICT4D), Learning for Social Change, and Social and Behavioural Communication, to name a few. This has created confusion and sometimes misunderstanding of what CSC is or should be. Even within the United Nations, which have been organising biennial Inter-agency Round Tables on Communication for Development since 1986, and have agreed on one universal definition for Communication for Development, different agencies still use different terms and definitions that are context specific within their own programmes (UNESCO, 2010). Different organisations also seem to have different expectations of what CSC is expected to contribute to their mission in terms of impacts, some with a stronger emphasis on predetermined behavioural change and others on empowered decision making by constituencies. As a result, there is wide variability in implementation strategies and whether it is the process that counts or the product, with academics arguing which of these strategies can reasonably be called CSC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balit, S. (2012), Communication for Development in Good and Difficult Times: The FAO experience (105–120), In F. Enghel & K. Wilkins (eds.), Communication, Media and Development: Problems and perspectives, Sweden, Nordicom Review, Special Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltran, L. R. (1979), Farewell to Aristotle: “Horizontal Communication”. International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems, No. 48. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0003/000393/039360eb.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (2004), On Dialogue (2nd edition), Abingdon, UK, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. & Goodsmith, L. (2010), Communication, Participation, & Social Change: A review of communication initiatives addressing gender-based violence, gender norms, and harmful traditional practices in crisis-affected settings. Minneapolis, USA, American Refugee Committee. Retrieved from http://www.arcrelief.org/site/DocServer/Through_Our_Eyes_Desk_Review-FINAL.pdf?docID=1602

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagron, A. G. (2009), Playing with Fire: Power, participation, and communication for development (453–465), Development in Practice, 19, 4–5. DOI:10.1080/09614520902866470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M. J. (2011), Communication and Social Change: Structure, culture and agency, New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2012), CSDI End-of-Project Stocktaking Exercise — Final Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 99 pp. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/aq959e/aq959e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2014), Communication for Development. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/oek/communication-for-development/en/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, I., Young, J., Mendizabal, E. & Knezovich, J. (2008), Review of Research Communication in DFID-Funded Research Programme Consortia (RPC). London, UK, Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/5729.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2014), Social Dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/decent-work-agenda/social-dialogue/lang-en/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D. L. & Figueroa, M. E. (2009), Communication for Participatory Development: Dialogue, action and change (506–531), In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research, Abingdon, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M. (April 23, 2012), Malaria Fight Needs More than Nets [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org.au/Discover/Field-Stories/April-2012/Malaria-fight-needs-more-than-nets.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicetic, O., Rae, D. & van de Fliert, E. (2010), From knowing It All to Learning to Engage — Experiences from Australian interventions in agricultural research and development in Vietnam (573–584), In I. Darnhofer & M. Grötzer (eds.), Building Sustainable Rural Futures. The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty, 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna Austria, July 4–7, 2010. Retrieved from http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2010/2010_WS1.6_Nicetic.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicetic, O. & van de Fliert, E. (2014), Changing Institutional Culture: PM&E in transdisciplinary research for development, Paper presented at the 11th European IFSA Symposium, Berlin Germany, April 1–4, 2014 (proceedings forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam, G. B. (2012a), Mobile Technology Creating Change in Armenia, Oxford, UK, Oxfam. Retrieved from http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/mobile-technology-creating-change-in-armenia-249794

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam, G. B. (2012b), No Longer Sitting Quietly: Building space for community participation in Viet Nam. Oxfam Programme Insights, Oxford, UK, Oxfam. Retrieved from http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/no-longer-sitting-quietly-building-space-for-community-participation-in-vietnam-226737

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam Novib. (2012), Case Study: Apprendre a vivre (Learning about Living). Retrieved from http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/apprendre-vivre-learning-about-living-229473

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan International, Women in Cities International and UN-Habitat. (2012), Adolescent Girls Creating Safer Cities: Harnessing the potential of communication for development (C4D). 25 pp. Retrieved from http://plan-international.org/girls/pdfs/adolescent-girls-safer-cities.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarry, W & Ramírez, R. (2009), Communication for Another Development: Listening before telling (157), London, New York, Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Riyandari, V. (2014), Participation and Disciplinary Power: Governmentality in the agricultural sector in contemporary Indonesia (248), Doctoral thesis The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (1999), Communication for Development: One world, multiple cultures (323), Cresskill (NJ), Hampton Press, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacchi, J., Watkins, J. & Keerthirathne, K. (2009), Participatory Content Creation: Voice, communication, and development (573–584), Development in Practice, 19, 4–5. DOL10.1080/09614520902866389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Deak, A., Pettit, J. & Vogel, I. (2006), Learning for Social Change: Exploring concepts, methods and practice (43), Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Retrieved from http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/FLASC.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • The Communication Initiative, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The World Bank. (2007), World Congress on Communication for Development: Lessons, challenges, and the way forward (307 pp.), Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2004), What is Development Communication? Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTDEVCOMMENG/0„contentMDK:20240303~menuPK:34000167~pagePK:34000187~piPK:34000160~theSitePK:423815,00.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, T. & Mefalopulos, P. (2009), Participatory Communication: A practical guide, World Bank Working Paper No. 170. Washington, DC, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2011), Communication for Development: Strengthening the effectiveness of the United Nations. United Nations Development Programme and Oslo Governance Centre: Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.c4d.undg.org/files/communication-development-strengthening-effectiveness-united-nations

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2010), 11th UN Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=28939&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2014), Communication and Information. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2014), Communication for Development. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/cbsc/

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID. (January, 2008), Communication for Better Health. Population Report, Series J (56) Family Planning Programs. Retrieved from http://www.k4health.org/sites/default/files/commforbetterhealth.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Fliert, E. (2010), Participatory Communication in Rural Development: What does it take for the established order? (95–100), Extension Farming Systems Journal, 6, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Fliert, E. & Pham, T. T. (2008), Powerful or Forceful — Participatory Communication in Non-Participative Contexts. Paper presented at the 2008 IAMCR Annual Conference Media and Global Divides, July 20–25, 2008, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Fliert, E., Simpson Reeves, L., Walker, G., Sepulveda, C, Sam, S. & Nigussie, H. (2014), Mainstreaming ComDev in Policies and Programmes -Enabling social inclusion to support food-secure and resilient livelihoods. Background discussion paper for the XIII United Nations Inter-Agency Round Table on Communication for Development. Rome: The Food and Agriculture Organisation

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Fliert, E., Vuong, P. T., Hien, D. T. M., Thomas, P. & Nicetic, O. (2010), Out of Comfort Zones, into Realities: Research for development with upland ethnic minority communities in North West Vietnam (330–342), In Ika Darnhofer & Michaela Grötzer (eds.), Building Sustainable Rural Futures. The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty. 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna Austria, July 4–7, 2010. Retrieved from http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2010/2010_WS1.3_vanDeFliert.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. & Mouyly, V. (2013), The Importance of Being Connected: Urban poor women’s experience of self-help discourse in Cambodia (313–326), Gender & Development, 21, 2. DOI:10.1080/13552074.2013.802482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2012), Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI): A toolkit for behavioural and social communication in outbreak response, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Pradip Ninan Thomas and Elske van de Fliert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, P.N., van de Fliert, E. (2014). Revisiting CSC Practice. In: Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426314_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics