Skip to main content
  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

Humans make judgments and comparisons. They especially compare to determine which human characteristic or act is best and which is worst. These comparative judgments, if not unavoidable, often guide action and policy. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) sort out accident victims according to triage principles, attending to the most critically injured first. They treat unconscious victims before those victims with less severe injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. William Schabas, Genocide in International Law: The Crimes of Crimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 452.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Alison Palmer, “Ethnocide” in Genocide in Our Time, eds. Michael N. Dobkowski and Isidor Walliman, chap. 1 (Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas W. Simon, The Laws of Genocide: Prescription for a Just World (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007): 56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etymology provides a further important clue for finding the basics of a genocide act. Given the word’s derivation from the Latin caedere (“to kill”), whatever else genocide encompasses, it should include the act of killing. Adam Jones, Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction (New York: Routledge, 2006): 8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. James Alan Fox and Jack Levin, Overkill: Mass Murder and Serial Killing Exposed (New York: Plenum Press, 1994), 201–206.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas. W. Simon, “Defining Genocide,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 15 (1996): 248.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nina H.B. Jorgensen, The Responsibility Of States For International Crimes, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 112.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Philip L. Reichel, Comparative Criminal Justice Systems (Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2012), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William A. Schabas, “State Policy as an Element of International Crimes,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98 (2008): 966—67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander K. A. Greenwalt, “Rethinking Genocidal Intent: The Case for Knowledge-Based Interpretation,” Columbia Law Review 99 (1999): 2284–88.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kai Ambos, “What Does “Intent to Destroy” in Genocide Mean?” International Review of Red Cross 91 (2009): 834–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See Thomas W. Simon, “A Theory of Disadvantaged Groups,” in Democracy and Social Injustice (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995), 71–107.

    Google Scholar 

  13. As quoted in Merle Hoffman, “I Am Against Fanatics,” in On Prejudice: A Global Perspective, ed. Daniela Gioseffi (New York: Anchor, 1993), 549.

    Google Scholar 

  14. George J. Andreopoulos, “Introduction: The Calculus of Genocide,” Genocide: Conceptualand Historical Dimensions, ed. George J. Andreopoulos (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope (New York: Penguin Books, 1999), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stanley M. Elkins, Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life, 2nd ed. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1968), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  17. George Fitzhugh, Cannibals All! Or Slaves Without Masters, ed. C. Vann Woodward (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1960, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laurence Thomas, “Characterizing the Evil of American Slavery and the Holocaust,” in Jewish Identity, eds. David Theo Goldberg and Michael Krausz (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1993), 153–76, 172.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. J. Rummel, “The Holocaust in Comparative and Historical Perspective,” Paper delivered to the Conference on “The ‘Other’ as a Threat: Demonization and Antisemistism,” June 12–15, 1995 at Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ronald Gossop, Confronting War: An Examination of Humanity’s Most Pressing Problem, 2nd ed. (Jefferson, NC: MacFarland, 1987), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eric Markusen, “Genocide and Modern War,” in Genocide in Our Time, eds. Michael N. Dobkowski and Isidor Walliman (Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian Press, 1992), 122.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Irving Louis Horowitz, Taking lives: Genocide and State Power, 3nd ed. (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1982), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. “I cannot accept the view that … the bombing, in time of war, of such civilian enemy populations as those of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Hamburg, and Dresden does not constitute genocide within the terms of the [UN] convention.” Leo Kuper, Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century (New York: Penguin Books, 1981). Kuper cites the following estimates of deaths from Allied pattern bombings: In Dresden at least 40,000 people were killed; in Hamburg 40,000; and in Tokyo as many as 130,000 were victims.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leo Kuper, “Theoretical Issues Relating to Genocide: Uses and Abuses,” in Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions, ed. George J. Andreopoulos (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Thomas W. Simon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, T.W. (2016). Comparing Wrongs. In: Genocide, Torture, and Terrorism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415110_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics