Skip to main content

Assurance in Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Japan

  • Chapter
Corporate Social Disclosure

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series ((PAMABS))

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed significant improvement in sustainability reporting (SR) around the world (KPMG, 2013). While accountability to the external stakeholders should be the basic premise of SR, a number of observers have criticized the credibility and completeness of such reporting to ensure transparency and accountability (O’Dwyer & Owen, 2005; Adams, 2004; Adams & Evans, 2004). SR is observed as an important tool to manage the powerful stakeholders and ensure corporate legitimacy (Deegan & Unerman, 2011). The provision of assurance1 in SR can enhance the credibility of reporting and thereby can ensure the accountability and transparency to the stakeholders (Dando & Swift, 2003). In fact, there has been a steady increase in third-party assurance in SR in the last ten years. While in 2002, only 29% of leading global companies had purchased such assurance service, the adoption rate was increased to 59% in 2013 (KPMG, 20132).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, C. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting — Performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17, (5), 731–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hamadeen, R.H. (2007). Assurance of Corporate Stand-Alone Reporting: Evidence from the UK. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of St. Andrews, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, A., Owen, D.L. & Gray, R.H. (2000). External transparency or internal capture? The role of third party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, (1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CorporateRegister.com (2008). Assure View: The CSR Assurance Statement Report. London: CorporateRegister.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, N. & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, (2–3), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., Cooper, B.J. & Shelly, M. (2006). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, (4), 329–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. & Unerman, J. (2011). Financial Accounting Theory. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgley, C.R., Jones, M.J. & Solomon, J.F. (2010). Stakeholder inclusivity in social and environmental report assurance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23, (4), 532–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, A. (2010). How credible are mining companies’ sustainability reports? A critical analysis of external assurance under the requirement of the International Council on Mining and Metals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, (6), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free, C., Salterio, S.E. & Shearer, T. (2009). The construction of auditability: MBA rankings and assurance in practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, G. & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2010). Sustainability Reporting Assurance: Market Trends and Information Content. Melbourne: CPA Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, C. (2010). A Study of Sustainability Verification Practices: The French Case. Paper presented at the European Accounting Conference, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) (2002). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Boston, MA: The Global Reporting Initiative, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) (2006). RG Sustainability Reporting Guidelines — Version 3 (G3). Amsterdam: The Global Reporting Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, M.B. (2012). Assurance in Sustainability Reporting and its Legitimacy: Evidence from Japan. Unpublished PhD thesis, Kobe University, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, M.B. & Kokubu, K. (forthcoming). Assurance and third-party comment on sustainability reporting in Japan: A descriptive study. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2006). Handbook of International Auditing, Assurance, and Ethics Pronouncements 2006 Edition. New York: The International Federation of Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.J. & Solomon, J.F. (2010). Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence. Accounting Forum, 34, (1), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, (3), 182–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2008). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008, Amsterdam: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011). International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. Amsterdam: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2011. Amsterdam: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2013). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Amsterdam: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock, T.J., Strohm, C. & Swartz, K.M. (2007). An examination of worldwide assured sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 17, (1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, (4), 1230–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. & Owen, D.L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. British Accounting Review, 37, (2), 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B. & Owen D.L. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance: An examination of recent sustainability assurance practice. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D. & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, (1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., Swift, T.A., Humphrey, C. & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9, (1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Brorson, T. (2005). Experiences of and views on third party assurance of corporate environmental and sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, (10–11), 1095–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, P.M. (2009). Causes and consequences of assurance provider choice for sustainability reporting: An international study. International Journal of Management, 26, (3), 412–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Responsible Care Japan (2010). Responsible Care Report 2010. Responsible Care Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1999). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A. & Chua, W.F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84, (3), 937–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Haniffa, R. & Fairbrass, J. (2011). A conceptual framework for investigating “capture” in corporate sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, (3), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M.J. (2003). Independent Assurance on Corporate Sustainability Reports. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Mohammad Badrul Haider and Katsuhiko Kokubu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haider, M.B., Kokubu, K. (2015). Assurance in Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Japan. In: Noronha, C. (eds) Corporate Social Disclosure. Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414694_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics