Skip to main content
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that the defeat of the Labour Party in the 1983 general election signalled the end of the centrality of internal ideological divisions in the development of labour movement policy and the beginning of a long period in which the focus was and remains on a largely pragmatic rearguard defence of the prerogatives of trade unions. The chapter describes how the arguments of the TUC and the Labour Party in support of collective industrial relations have developed and diverged from the mid-1980s to the present. While the common ground between the political and industrial wings of the labour movement has significantly narrowed, the chapter shows that they are at least united in their unwillingness — or inability — to challenge the basic conceptual foundations for industrial relations policy laid during the Thatcher and Major years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Conor Cradden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cradden, C. (2014). Post-pluralist Collective Industrial Relations. In: Neoliberal Industrial Relations Policy in the UK: How the Labour Movement Lost the Argument. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413819_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics