Skip to main content
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Muslims have created great civilizations throughout history; but the Muslim world has experienced a visible decline starting from the 19th century due—at least in part—to the technological developments in the West. Since then, many of the scientific and economic models that were transferred and implemented in commercial and social life in Islamic countries were mostly against Islamic culture. Ihis is the main reason for the ongoing discussions on whether the notions imported from the Western literature are Islamically acceptable or not. What does an Islamic reference in an economic or social model refer to? This chapter seeks an answer to the question of who is a Muslim and what responsibilities he/she has under Islam in order to distinguish a Muslim individual from a secular one. Hopefully this will enable us to better explain the differences between the economic models offered by Islam and the secular world, and clarify the conceptual arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akademi Araştırma Heyeti (2012). Bir Müslümanin Yol Maritasi, (İlmihal). Istanbul: Işik Yayinlari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmtaş, R. (2005). Din ve Sekülerleşme. Istanbul: Pinar Yayinlari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, M. (2010). Seküler Toplumlarda Kutsal Arayişlari: Geç Modern Dönemde Büyü-Din İlişkisinin Sosyoiojik Analizi. İ. Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1 (1), 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formulions of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balci, M. (2013). Hukuk Mantığı. In Genç HukukçularHukuk Okumalari: Birikimler 1 (pp. 471–488). İstanbul: Kristal Rcklam Matbaacilik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balci, M. (2014, July 11). Müslümanin Hayat ile İlişkisi. (M. Ustaoğlu, Interviewer) İstanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1973). The Social Reality of Religion. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulaç, A. (2009). ᅟslam, liberalizm ve özgürlük. Istanbul, Turkey: Zaman Gazetesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ashker, A. A., & Wilson, R. (2006). Islamic Economics a Short History. Boston, USA: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertit, V. (2013). Teoriler ışıgmda Avrupa sekülerieşmesi. The Journal of International Social Research, 7 (29), 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. L. (2002). Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam. New York: OXFORD University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, N. (2013). Doşumu, Ölümü ve Dirilişi: İslam Devleti. (İ. Durdu, Trans.) İstanbul: Ufuk Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, R. K. (1969). The Secularization of Values: An Analytical Framework for the Study of Secularization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (2003). Contemporary Islamist Movements and the New Sources for Religious Tolerance, Journal of Human Rights, 2 (1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouchet, M. (2000). Demokrasi içinde Din. (M. E. Özcan, Trans.) Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayinlari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J. (1997). Religion, Secularisation and Politics: A Postmodern Conspectus. The World Quarterly, 18, 709–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazır, M. (2012). Coming of Post-Secularism: Sociology of Secularism in 21st Century. journal of Academic Inquiries, 7 (2), 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoake, G. (1896). Origin and Nature of Secularism. London: Watts & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, F. J. (1991). The Case against Secularization: A Rebuttal. Social Forces, 69, 1103–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. (1979). The Structural Conditions of Religious Consciousness in Modern Societies. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6, 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor, S. (2008). Tanrı’yı terk etmeden tarihe sahip.ıkmak: İslam, Sekülarizm ve dünyevileşme sorunu. Milel ve Nihal Dergisi, 5 (2), 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSS (2014). What Is Secularism? Retrieved March 25, 2014, from National Secular Society: http://www.secularism.org.uk/what-is-secularism.html

  • Oxford (2003). Secular. Oxford Dictionary of English. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, Ş. (2007). Din-ekonomi ilişkisi ve güncel arayişlar. On Dokuz Mavis Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, G. H. (1971). Hegel’s Concept of Freedom. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, 5, 174–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihlström, S. (2007). Religion and Pseudo-Religion: An Elusive Boundary. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 62, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qutb, S. (2000). The Social Justice in Islam-Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Islamic Publications International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, A. B. (2010). The Impact of Secularism on Religious Beliefs and Practices. Journal of Islam in Asia, 7 (1), 157–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, A. (2011). The Secular Contract. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroush, A. (2000). Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush (M. Sadri & A. Sadri, Trans) New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekin, M. (2012). Batı’da Sekülerlik ve Türkiye Müslümanlığinin Seküler İçerimleri. İnsan & Toplum, 2 (4), 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen, O. (1991). The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematizafion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2009). Protestan Ahlaki ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu (G. Solmaz, Trans.) Ankara: Alter Yayincilik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yapıcı, A. (2011). Geleneksellik ile modernlik arasinda sıkışan din arayişlari ve dindarlik. DEM Dergi, 1 (2), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, M. H., & Esposito, J. (2003). Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Murat Ustaoğlu & Ahmet İncekara

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ustaoğlu, M., İncekara, A. (2014). The First Step towards Islamic Finance: Separation of Secularism and the Islamic Agenda. In: Ustaoğlu, M., İncekara, A. (eds) Islamic Finance Alternatives for Emerging Economies: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413307_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics