Abstract
The expansion of higher education is both necessary and desirable. But, as the opening section of this chapter explains, higher education is costly and faces competing imperatives for public spending. The second part of the chapter explains the market failures faced by lending to finance investment in human capital and compares two approaches to addressing them: a graduate tax, where graduates repay a fraction of their earnings for life, or till retirement (i.e., equity finance), and income contingent loans, where repayments stop once the graduate has repaid his or her loan; and concludes by discussing designs which combine the two approaches. The third section discusses the ill-effects of blanket interest subsidies and provides brief assessments of reforms of higher education finance in the UK, New Zealand and Hungary, all of which have income contingent systems. A concluding section briefly outlines unanswered theoretical questions about the design of student loans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barr, N. (1989) ‘Alternative Proposals for Student Loans in the United Kingdom’, in M. Woodhall (ed.), Financial Support for Students: Grants, Loans or Graduate Tax?, (London: Kogan Page), pp. 110–121.
Barr, N. (2010) ‘Student loans to protect low earners’, Research Note, Policy Exchange, October 2010. Online at http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/pdfs/Student_loans.pdf.
Barr, N. (2012a) The Economics of the Welfare State, 5th edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Barr, N. (2012b) ‘The Higher Education White Paper: The Good, the Bad, the Unspeakable — and the Next White Paper’, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 483–508.
Berlinger, E. (2009) ‘An Efficient Student Loan System: Case Study of Hungary’, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 257–67.
Chapman, B. and C. Ryan (2005) ‘The Access Implications of Income Related Charges for Higher Education: Lessons from Australia’, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 491–512.
Friedman, M. (1955) ‘The Role of Government in Education’, in R. A. Solo (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press), pp. 123–44.
Glennerster, H., S. Merrett and G. Wilson (1968) ‘A Graduate Tax’, Higher Education Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 26–38, reprinted in Higher Education Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 25–40.
Johnson, A. and N. Barr (2013) ‘Student Loan Reform, Interest Subsidies and Costly Technicalities: Lessons From the UK Experience’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 166–177.
New Zealand Ministry of Education (2002) ‘Annual Report: Student Loan Scheme’ (Wellington: Ministry of Education).
Robbins Report (1963) ‘Higher Education: Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister Under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins’ (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).
Shen, H. and A. Ziderman (2009) ‘Student Loans Repayment and Recovery: International Comparisons’, Higher Education, No. 3, pp. 315–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 International Economics Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barr, N. (2014). Income Contingent Loans and Higher Education Financing: Theory and Practice. In: Chapman, B., Higgins, T., Stiglitz, J.E. (eds) Income Contingent Loans. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413208_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413208_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41319-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41320-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)