Abstract
Appointing lead banks for an IPO can be a complex and time-consuming exercise. But it is well worth extending the effort to ensure that the senior syndicate banks are well-qualified, and also able to work harmoniously together. Importantly, a tight, core group of houses should be responsible for driving the transaction, with perhaps a slightly wider number of firms involved in the marketing phase per se, from assembling a group of cornerstone investors (if any), right through to the pricing and allocation stages. Appointing a very large number of firms for any IPO is simply the wrong thing to do: it will irremediably dilute responsibilities and economics while in no way ensuring that a wider pool of investors is accessed and allocated. More banks do not equal more demand, and even less so higher quality allocations of stock to investors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
www.bloomberg.com: Kari Lundgren and Thomas Penny, ‘Royal Mail stock jumps 38% on first trading day after IPO’, 11 October 2013.
www.ibtimes.co.uk: Lianna Brinded, ‘Royal Mail shares: Vince Cable and Lazard bankers to face parliamentary inquiry over IPO price’, 16 October 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Philippe Espinasse
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Espinasse, P. (2014). Conclusion. In: IPO Banks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412942_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137412942_30
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48975-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41294-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)