Abstract
Speaking to the House of Commons in 1601 in support of An Act Conc’ninge matters of Assurances, amongste Merchantes, Francis Bacon outlined the fundamental importance of marine insurance to trade, and thus to the nation. With his usual eloquence, he explained to MPs how insurance means that with the ‘loss or perishing of any ship, there fol- loweth not the undoing of any man, but the loss lighter rather easily upon many, than heavily upon fewe’. Bacon did not expand on the nature of the many who were to grant merchants, in exchange for ‘some consideration of money… assurance made of their goods, merchandises, ships and things adventured’. He expressed no opinion as to whether insurance would best be provided by individuals (as it was almost exclusively when he spoke), or groups of individuals associated into companies (as it was to become).1 Adam Smith was more certain. In Wealth of Nations he asserted that marine insurance is one of the very few commercial activities for which joint-stock companies constitute an appropriate form of organisation.2 In the many decades between Bacon’s silence and Smith’s pronouncement, the question of private versus corporate underwriting was addressed repeatedly. This chapter examines the development of corporate forms of marine insurance underwriting in Britain over the centuries, culminating in the first chartering of British joint-stock marine insurance companies in June 1720.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Bacon, Francis: ‘Speech on the Assurance Bill’ [1601], in Spedding, J.J.: The life and letters of Francis Bacon, London: Longmans Green Reader & Dyer, 1868, III, pp. 34–5.
Smith, Adam: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Cannan, Edwin (ed.), London: Methuen, 1904.
Oliveira Marques, A.H. de: Para a história dos seguros em Portugal: notas de documentos, Lisbon: Arcadia, 1977, pp. 20–1.
Lopes, Fernão: Chronica de el-rei D. Fernando, Lisbon: Biblioteca de Classicos Portuguezes, 1895, II, pp. 106–11.
Jones, W.J.: ‘Elizabethan marine insurance: the judicial undergrowth’, Business History, vol. 2, no. 2 (1970), p. 58.
Anonymous [J. Accarias de Sérionne?], La richesses de la Hollande, Amsterdam: 1778, I, pp. 213, 242–9; Go, Sabine: Marine insurance in the Netherlands 1600–1870, a comparative institutional approach, Amsterdam: Askant, 2009, pp. 137–9.
Blackstock, W.W.: The historical literature of sea and fire insurance in Great Britain: a conspectus and bibliography, Manchester: Rawson, 1910, p. 35.
Stefani, G.: Insurance in Venice: from the origins to the end of the Serenissima, Dawson Amoruso, A. (trans.), Trieste: Generali, 1958, I, p. 125.
Ruffat, M.: ‘French insurance from the ancient regime to 1946: shifting frontiers’, Financial History Review, vol. 10, no. 2 (2003), p. 187.
On insurance at Rouen, see Malynes, Gerard: Consuetudo, vel, Lex Mercatoria: or, The Ancient Law-Merchant, London: printed for T. Basset & R. Smith, 1685 (first published 1622), p. 112
Scott identified 190 promotions, although he overestimated the number of insurance promotions by one. Scott, William Robert: The constitution and finance of English, Scottish, and Irish joint-stock companies to 1720, three vols, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1968 [1912], I, p. 327, III, pp. 445–58.
Cummings, A.J.G. and Stewart, L.: ‘The case of the eighteenth-century projector: entrepreneurs, engineers, and legitimacy at the Hanoverian Court in Britain’ in Moran, Bruce T. (ed.), Patronage and institutions: science, technology, and medicine at the European Court, 1500–1750, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1991, pp. 260–1.
Frehen, R.G.P., Goetzmann, William N.K. and Rouwenhorst, Geert: ‘New evidence on the first financial bubble’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 108, no. 3 (2013), pp. 585–607.
Leonard, A.B.: The origins and development of London marine insurance, 1547- 1824, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2013, pp. 141–51.
Wright, C. & Fayle, C.E.: A history of Lloyd’s, London: Macmillan & Co., 1928, p. 51.
T. B. (Merchant), A Letter to the Chairman of the Committee (London, 1720?).
Hendriks, F.: ‘On the first parliamentary committee on insurance; with remarks illustrative of other facts connected with the history of insurance’, The Assurance Magazine, and Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, vol. 4, no. 4 (1854), p. 119.
Harris, R.: ‘The Bubble Act: its passage and its effects on business organisation’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 54, no. 3 (1994), p. 614.
Raynes, H.E.: A history of British insurance, second edition, London: Pitman & Sons, 1964, p. 106.
Scott, Joint-Stock Companies, III, pp. 398–9; Supple, B.: The Royal Exchange Assurance: a history of British insurance, 1720–1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, p. 20; Journals of the House of Commons, vol. XIX, p. 341; The special report, pp. 51–3.
Ward, E.: A satyr against satyrs: or, an answer to a late pamphlet intituled, the picture of a coffee-house, London, 1700, p. 6; Cummings and Stewart, The eighteenth-century projector, pp. 235–61.
Craggs to Luke Shaub, June, 1719, cited in Beatie, John M.: The English court in the reign of George I, London: Cambridge University Press, 1967, pp. 146–7.
Carswell, John: The South Sea bubble, London: Crescent Press, 1961, p. 257.
Plumb, J.H.: Sir Robert Walpole: the making of a statesman, London: Crescent Press, 1956, p. 291.
Hoppit, J.: ‘The myths of the South Sea Bubble’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series, vol. 12, Cambridge: Royal Historical Society, 2002, p. 159.
Leonard, A. B.: ‘Contingent commitment: the development of English marine insurance in the context of New Institutional Economics, 1577- 1720’, in Coffman, D’Maris; Leonard, A.B.; and Neal, Larry (eds): Questioning ‘credible commitment’: perspectives on the rise of financial capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 48–75.
Wennerlind, Carl: Casualties of credit: the English financial revolution, 1620- 1720, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011, pp. 161–2.
Winch, Donald: ‘Eden, Sir Frederick Morton, second baronet (1766–1809)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 online edn.
Eden, Sir Frederick: On the policy and expediency of granting insurance charters, London: Burton, 1806, pp. 7–8.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Anastasia Bogatyreva
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bogatyreva, A. (2016). England 1660–1720: Corporate or Private?. In: Leonard, A.B. (eds) Marine Insurance. Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137411389_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137411389_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56584-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41138-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)