Advertisement

England 1660–1720: Corporate or Private?

  • Anastasia Bogatyreva
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance Series book series (PSHF)

Abstract

Speaking to the House of Commons in 1601 in support of An Act Conc’ninge matters of Assurances, amongste Merchantes, Francis Bacon outlined the fundamental importance of marine insurance to trade, and thus to the nation. With his usual eloquence, he explained to MPs how insurance means that with the ‘loss or perishing of any ship, there fol- loweth not the undoing of any man, but the loss lighter rather easily upon many, than heavily upon fewe’. Bacon did not expand on the nature of the many who were to grant merchants, in exchange for ‘some consideration of money… assurance made of their goods, merchandises, ships and things adventured’. He expressed no opinion as to whether insurance would best be provided by individuals (as it was almost exclusively when he spoke), or groups of individuals associated into companies (as it was to become).1 Adam Smith was more certain. In Wealth of Nations he asserted that marine insurance is one of the very few commercial activities for which joint-stock companies constitute an appropriate form of organisation.2 In the many decades between Bacon’s silence and Smith’s pronouncement, the question of private versus corporate underwriting was addressed repeatedly. This chapter examines the development of corporate forms of marine insurance underwriting in Britain over the centuries, culminating in the first chartering of British joint-stock marine insurance companies in June 1720.

Keywords

Special Report Private Insurer East India Company Corporate Form Marine Insurance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Bacon, Francis: ‘Speech on the Assurance Bill’ [1601], in Spedding, J.J.: The life and letters of Francis Bacon, London: Longmans Green Reader & Dyer, 1868, III, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, Adam: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Cannan, Edwin (ed.), London: Methuen, 1904.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Oliveira Marques, A.H. de: Para a história dos seguros em Portugal: notas de documentos, Lisbon: Arcadia, 1977, pp. 20–1.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Lopes, Fernão: Chronica de el-rei D. Fernando, Lisbon: Biblioteca de Classicos Portuguezes, 1895, II, pp. 106–11.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Jones, W.J.: ‘Elizabethan marine insurance: the judicial undergrowth’, Business History, vol. 2, no. 2 (1970), p. 58.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Anonymous [J. Accarias de Sérionne?], La richesses de la Hollande, Amsterdam: 1778, I, pp. 213, 242–9; Go, Sabine: Marine insurance in the Netherlands 1600–1870, a comparative institutional approach, Amsterdam: Askant, 2009, pp. 137–9.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Blackstock, W.W.: The historical literature of sea and fire insurance in Great Britain: a conspectus and bibliography, Manchester: Rawson, 1910, p. 35.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    Stefani, G.: Insurance in Venice: from the origins to the end of the Serenissima, Dawson Amoruso, A. (trans.), Trieste: Generali, 1958, I, p. 125.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Ruffat, M.: ‘French insurance from the ancient regime to 1946: shifting frontiers’, Financial History Review, vol. 10, no. 2 (2003), p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. On insurance at Rouen, see Malynes, Gerard: Consuetudo, vel, Lex Mercatoria: or, The Ancient Law-Merchant, London: printed for T. Basset & R. Smith, 1685 (first published 1622), p. 112Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Scott identified 190 promotions, although he overestimated the number of insurance promotions by one. Scott, William Robert: The constitution and finance of English, Scottish, and Irish joint-stock companies to 1720, three vols, Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1968 [1912], I, p. 327, III, pp. 445–58.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    Cummings, A.J.G. and Stewart, L.: ‘The case of the eighteenth-century projector: entrepreneurs, engineers, and legitimacy at the Hanoverian Court in Britain’ in Moran, Bruce T. (ed.), Patronage and institutions: science, technology, and medicine at the European Court, 1500–1750, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1991, pp. 260–1.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Frehen, R.G.P., Goetzmann, William N.K. and Rouwenhorst, Geert: ‘New evidence on the first financial bubble’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 108, no. 3 (2013), pp. 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 24.
    Leonard, A.B.: The origins and development of London marine insurance, 1547- 1824, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2013, pp. 141–51.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    Wright, C. & Fayle, C.E.: A history of Lloyd’s, London: Macmillan & Co., 1928, p. 51.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    T. B. (Merchant), A Letter to the Chairman of the Committee (London, 1720?).Google Scholar
  17. 48.
    Hendriks, F.: ‘On the first parliamentary committee on insurance; with remarks illustrative of other facts connected with the history of insurance’, The Assurance Magazine, and Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, vol. 4, no. 4 (1854), p. 119.Google Scholar
  18. 54.
    Harris, R.: ‘The Bubble Act: its passage and its effects on business organisation’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 54, no. 3 (1994), p. 614.Google Scholar
  19. 63.
    Raynes, H.E.: A history of British insurance, second edition, London: Pitman & Sons, 1964, p. 106.Google Scholar
  20. 65.
    Scott, Joint-Stock Companies, III, pp. 398–9; Supple, B.: The Royal Exchange Assurance: a history of British insurance, 1720–1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, p. 20; Journals of the House of Commons, vol. XIX, p. 341; The special report, pp. 51–3.Google Scholar
  21. 67.
    Ward, E.: A satyr against satyrs: or, an answer to a late pamphlet intituled, the picture of a coffee-house, London, 1700, p. 6; Cummings and Stewart, The eighteenth-century projector, pp. 235–61.Google Scholar
  22. 71.
    Craggs to Luke Shaub, June, 1719, cited in Beatie, John M.: The English court in the reign of George I, London: Cambridge University Press, 1967, pp. 146–7.Google Scholar
  23. 72.
    Carswell, John: The South Sea bubble, London: Crescent Press, 1961, p. 257.Google Scholar
  24. Plumb, J.H.: Sir Robert Walpole: the making of a statesman, London: Crescent Press, 1956, p. 291.Google Scholar
  25. 74.
    Hoppit, J.: ‘The myths of the South Sea Bubble’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth Series, vol. 12, Cambridge: Royal Historical Society, 2002, p. 159.Google Scholar
  26. 75.
    Leonard, A. B.: ‘Contingent commitment: the development of English marine insurance in the context of New Institutional Economics, 1577- 1720’, in Coffman, D’Maris; Leonard, A.B.; and Neal, Larry (eds): Questioning ‘credible commitment’: perspectives on the rise of financial capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 76.
    Wennerlind, Carl: Casualties of credit: the English financial revolution, 1620- 1720, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011, pp. 161–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 77.
    Winch, Donald: ‘Eden, Sir Frederick Morton, second baronet (1766–1809)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 online edn.Google Scholar
  29. 78.
    Eden, Sir Frederick: On the policy and expediency of granting insurance charters, London: Burton, 1806, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anastasia Bogatyreva 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasia Bogatyreva

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations