Abstract
The Importance of Being Earnest is the most performed of Wilde’s social comedies. Robert Tanitch records some 117 productions between George Alexander’s first staging of the play at the St. James’s Theatre in 1895 and 1998, when he concluded his census of performances.1 They range from Britain and Ireland through Europe and North America to Australia, and the number includes several plays such as Tom Stoppard’s Jumpers (1974) and Mark Ravenhill’s Handbag (1998), which take their inspiration from Wilde’s comedy and enter into a dialogue with it. My own similar search through the newspaper criticisms included in Theatre Review since 2000 showed a count of some 15 productions in England, Scotland, and Wales over a span of 14 years. No comedies in the English language other than Shakespeare’s can match this show of popularity. There have been at least five filmed versions, twelve television and many radio adaptations, thirteen musicals (mostly American, all flops), some two operas, and a reduction of the play to a monologue for Lady Bracknell. Cast lists for the various stage and screen productions reveal a roll call of the finest actors worldwide who have essayed the various major roles, particularly that of Lady Bracknell, which has attracted five dames of the British Empire (Edith Evans, Flora Robson, Judi Dench, Joan Plowright, and Maggie Smith) and three celebrated actors at the zenith of their careers (William Hutt, Brian Bedford, and Geoffrey Rush), playing en travesti (though not one of them resorted to any hint of the dame-figure of traditional British pantomime).2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Tanitch, Oscar Wilde on Stage and Screen (London: Methuen, 1999), 252–328.
Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Earnest: A Reconstructive Critical Edition of the Text of the First Production, ed. Joseph Donohue with Ruth Berggren (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe, 1995).
Selected Letters of Oscar Wilde, ed. Rupert Hart-Davis (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1962), 128.
See Kerry Powell, “Re-Writing Farce,” Oscar Wilde in Context, ed. Kerry Powell and Peter Raby (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 168–76.
See too Peter Raby, “The Origins of The Importance of Being Earnest,” Modern Drama, XXXVII, 1, Spring 1994: 139–47.
See Frank Kermode, The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1967). The volume was seminal in stimulating extensive critical discussion about systems of closure in literature and drama.
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 69.
Michael Curtin, Propriety and Position: A Study of Victorian Manners (New York and London: Garland, 1987), 100.
Oscar Wilde, “The Importance of Being Earnest” and Other Plays, ed. Peter Raby (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 305. Interestingly, many actors in the role have been judged by critics as too old.
Sir John Gielgud, Gielgud on Gielgud (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2000), 407.
Cited in Jonathan Croall, John Gielgud: Matinee Idol to Movie Star (London: Methuen, 2011), 337. Gielgud profoundly believed that his aunt Mabel Terry-Lewis was hilarious as Lady Bracknell at the Lyric Theatre, Hammersmith (1930), precisely because “she had no idea that her lines were funny. ‘What on earth are they laughing at?’ she used to say.” (See Sir John Gielgud, Gielgud on Gielgud, 285.)
Jonathan Croall, Gielgud: A Theatrical Life, 1904–2000 (London: Methuen, 2001), 265.
Dame Irene Vanburgh, To Tell My Story (London: Hutchinson, 1948), 33.
W S. Gilbert, Engaged in English Nineteenth-Century Plays: III Comedies, ed. Michael Booth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), 330.
Kenneth Tynan, Tynan on Theatre (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964), 287.
Sir John Gielgud, An Actor and His Time (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1979), 158.
Michael Coveney in The Observer, Theatre Record, 13, i (1993): 261.
For a fuller discussion of the influences of Wilde’s social positioning on his comedies, see Richard Allen Cave, “Wilde’s Comedies,” A Companion to Modern British and Irish Drama: 1880–2005, ed. Mary Luckhurst (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), 213–24.
w48. John Peter in The Sunday Times, Theatre Record, 15, i (1995): 361.
See Selected Letters of Oscar Wilde, ed. Rupert Hart-Davis (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1962), 128.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Michael Y. Bennett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cave, R.A. (2015). Ernest in Name, But How Earnest in Manner?: Acting in Wilde’s Comedy. In: Bennett, M.Y. (eds) Oscar Wilde’s Society Plays. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410931_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137410931_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56827-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41093-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)