Skip to main content

The Question of a European Union ‘Beyond the State’

  • Chapter
European Integration and the Problem of the State
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Countless academics, intellectuals, journalists, and politicians of all ideological stripes have celebrated European integration as something novel, innovative, and progressive. In its ‘Fourth Lesson about the European Union,’ the EU’s website rehearses this familiar refrain: ‘The European Union is more than just a confederation of countries, but it is not a federal state. It is, in fact, a new type of structure that does not fall into any traditional legal category.’1 What is more, this ‘new type of structure’ that the reader learns about in their Fourth Lesson about the EU has been widely celebrated from almost all quarters and ideological persuasions. Cosmopolitan theorist David Held laments that the EU suffers from ‘something of an identity cri-sis’ despite ‘all its extraordinary innovation and progress.’2 If the EU could somehow find a remedy to its ‘identity crisis’ and ‘find its true self,’ the reader may infer, the future prospects for global life would rapidly start to look much brighter. Neo-Gramscian Robert W. Cox, contrasting the EU to bête-noire US hyperpuissance, approvingly claims that the EU, by a skillful blend of realpolitik and moral preference, ‘tend[s] to envisage a world political order … as the search for consensus and the elaboration of international law.’3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D. Held (2006) ‘Reframing Global Governance: Apocalypse Soon or Reform!’ New Political Economy 11, no. 2, p. 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. W. Cox (2004) ‘Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order,’ New Political Economy 9, no. 3. p. 316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Habermas and J. Derrida (2003) ‘February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe,’ Constellations 10, no. 3. p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. L. Doty (2003) Anti-Immigrantism in Western Democracies: Statecraft, Desire and the Politics of Exclusion (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Andersson (2009) The New Old World (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Spiering and M. Wintle (eds.) (2011) European Identity and the Second World War (Houndmills: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Diner (2003) ‘Restitution and Memory: The Holocaust in European Political Cultures,’ New German Critique 90, pp. 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Fossum (2012) ‘Cosmopolitanisation in Europe and Beyond,’ in E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum (eds.) Rethinking Democracy and the European Union (London and New York: Routledge), p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. B. Haas (1964) Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Bauman (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Hoffmann (1966) ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,’ Daedalus 95, no. 3, pp. 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Moravcsik (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Friese and P. Wagner (2002) ‘Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity,’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 3, pp. 342–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hix (1994) ‘The Study of the European Community: The Challenge to Comparative Politics,’ West European Politics 17, no. 1, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Hix (1999) The Political System of the European Union (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Drake (2000) Jacques Delors: Perspectives of a European Leader (London and New York: Routledge), p. x.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Zielonka (2006) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. A. M. Sbragia (1993) ‘The European Community: A Balancing Act,’ Publius 23, no. 3, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Bartolini (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation-State and the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. xiii.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. J. G. Ruggie (1993) ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,’ International Organization 47, no. 1, p. 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Caporaso 1996) ‘The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, no. 1, p. 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Zielonka (2006) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. v.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. R. B. J. Walker (2000) ‘Europe Is Not Where It Is Supposed to Be,’ in M. Kelstrup and M. Williams (eds.) International Relations and the Politics of European Integration (London and New York: Routledge), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Diez, I. Manners, and R. G. Whitman (2011) ‘The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union,’ Journal of European Integration 33, no. 2, pp. 117–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Bull (1995) The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd ed. (Houndmills and London: Macmillan), pp. 97–222.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Diez (2012) ‘Not Quite “Sui Generis” Enough.’ Interrogating European Values,’ European Societies 14, no. 4, pp. 522–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Diez (1995) Neues Europa, altes Modell: Die Konstruktion von Staatlichkeit im politischen Diskurs der europäischen Gemeinschaft (Frankfurt: Haag and Herchen), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Devetak (1995) ‘Incomplete States: Theories and Practices of Statecraft,’ in J. Macmillan and A. Linklater (eds.) Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations (London: Pinter Publishers), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. B. Macpherson (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: From Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. See P. Dunleavy and B. O’Leary (1987) Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy (Houndmills: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh (eds.) (2006) The State: Theories and Issues (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Weber (2004) ‘Politics as a Vocation,’ in D. Owen and T. B. Strong (eds.) R. Livingstone (trans.) The Vocation Lectures (Indianapolis: Hackett), pp. 32–94.

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Laclau and C. Mouffe (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. K. Ashley (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematic,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17, no. 2, pp. 227–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R. K. Ashley (1989) ‘Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War,’ in J. D. Derian and M. J. Shapiro (eds.) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books), pp. 259–321.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. Mitchell (1991) ‘The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics,’ American Political Science Review 85, no. 1, pp. 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  37. D. Campbell (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Weber (1998) ‘Performative States,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27, no.1, pp. 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Finlayson and J. Martin (2006) ‘Poststructuralism,’ in C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories and Issues (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 155–71.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Foucault (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79, in M. Senellart (ed.) G. Burchell (trans.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. T. Diez (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse,’ Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4, pp. 600–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J. Austin (1962) How To Do Things with Words (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Derrida (2002) ‘Declarations of Independence,’ in E. Rottenberg (ed.) E. Rottenberg (trans.) Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews 1971–2001 (Stanford University Press: Stanford), pp. 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. Foucault (1990) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, Robert Hurley (trans.) (New York: Vintage Books), pp. 88–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Rouse (1994) ‘Power/Knowledge,’ in G. Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Ringmar (1996) ‘On the Ontological Status of the State,’ European Journal of International Relations 2, no. 4, pp. 439–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Y. Lapid (2001) ‘Identities, Borders, Orders: Nudging International Relations Theory in a New Direction,’ in M. Albert, D. Jacobson and Y. Lapid (eds.) Identities, Borders, Orders — Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J. Butler (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York and London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Bartelson (1998) ‘Second Natures: Is the State Identical with Itself?,’ European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 3, pp. 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. J. Derrida (1992) The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe, P-A. Brault and M. B. Naas (trans.) (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Dillon (1996) Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought (London and New York: Routledge), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  52. S. Toulmin (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. C. Williams (1998) ‘Identity and the Politics of Security,’ European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2, pp. 204–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. C. Davis (2005) ‘Etat Present: Hauntology, Spectres and Phantoms,’ French Studies LIX, no. 3, p. 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. T. Hobbes (1991) Leviathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  56. H. Staten (1986) Wittgenstein and Derrida (Lincoln: University of Nebraska).

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Waltzer (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  58. A. Burke (2007) Beyond Security, Ethics and Violence: War Against the Other (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. Albert and L. Brock (2001), ‘What Keeps Westphalia Together? Normative Differentiation in the Modern System of States,’ in M. Albert, D. Jacobson and Y. Lapid (eds.) Identities, Borders, Orders. Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  60. R. B. J. Walker (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  61. C. Brown (1992) International Relations: New Normative Approaches (New York and Oxford: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  62. N. Inayatullah and D. Blaney (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. Agnew (1994) ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory,’ Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 1, p. 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. David Campbell (1994) ‘The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics After the End of Philosophy’, Alternatives, 19, no. 4, pp. 455–84.

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. L. Doty (2006) ‘Fronteras Compasivas and the Ethics of Unconditional Hospitality,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35, no. 1, pp. 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. S. P. Huntington (2004) Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity (New York: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. Elbe (2003) Europe. A Nietzschean Perspective (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  68. S. Elbe (2002) ‘“Labyrinths of the Future”: Nietzsche’s Genealogy of European Nationalism,’ Journal of Political Ideologies 7, no. 1, p. 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Stefan Borg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borg, S. (2015). The Question of a European Union ‘Beyond the State’. In: European Integration and the Problem of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409331_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics