Abstract
Countless academics, intellectuals, journalists, and politicians of all ideological stripes have celebrated European integration as something novel, innovative, and progressive. In its ‘Fourth Lesson about the European Union,’ the EU’s website rehearses this familiar refrain: ‘The European Union is more than just a confederation of countries, but it is not a federal state. It is, in fact, a new type of structure that does not fall into any traditional legal category.’1 What is more, this ‘new type of structure’ that the reader learns about in their Fourth Lesson about the EU has been widely celebrated from almost all quarters and ideological persuasions. Cosmopolitan theorist David Held laments that the EU suffers from ‘something of an identity cri-sis’ despite ‘all its extraordinary innovation and progress.’2 If the EU could somehow find a remedy to its ‘identity crisis’ and ‘find its true self,’ the reader may infer, the future prospects for global life would rapidly start to look much brighter. Neo-Gramscian Robert W. Cox, contrasting the EU to bête-noire US hyperpuissance, approvingly claims that the EU, by a skillful blend of realpolitik and moral preference, ‘tend[s] to envisage a world political order … as the search for consensus and the elaboration of international law.’3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Held (2006) ‘Reframing Global Governance: Apocalypse Soon or Reform!’ New Political Economy 11, no. 2, p. 163.
R. W. Cox (2004) ‘Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order,’ New Political Economy 9, no. 3. p. 316.
J. Habermas and J. Derrida (2003) ‘February 15, or What Binds Europeans Together: A Plea for a Common Foreign Policy, Beginning in the Core of Europe,’ Constellations 10, no. 3. p. 294.
R. L. Doty (2003) Anti-Immigrantism in Western Democracies: Statecraft, Desire and the Politics of Exclusion (London: Routledge).
P. Andersson (2009) The New Old World (London: Verso).
M. Spiering and M. Wintle (eds.) (2011) European Identity and the Second World War (Houndmills: Palgrave).
D. Diner (2003) ‘Restitution and Memory: The Holocaust in European Political Cultures,’ New German Critique 90, pp. 36–44.
J. E. Fossum (2012) ‘Cosmopolitanisation in Europe and Beyond,’ in E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum (eds.) Rethinking Democracy and the European Union (London and New York: Routledge), p. 186.
E. B. Haas (1964) Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
Z. Bauman (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence (Cambridge: Polity).
S. Hoffmann (1966) ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,’ Daedalus 95, no. 3, pp. 862–915.
A. Moravcsik (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
H. Friese and P. Wagner (2002) ‘Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity,’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 3, pp. 342–64.
S. Hix (1994) ‘The Study of the European Community: The Challenge to Comparative Politics,’ West European Politics 17, no. 1, 1–30.
S. Hix (1999) The Political System of the European Union (London: Palgrave).
H. Drake (2000) Jacques Delors: Perspectives of a European Leader (London and New York: Routledge), p. x.
J. Zielonka (2006) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 5.
A. M. Sbragia (1993) ‘The European Community: A Balancing Act,’ Publius 23, no. 3, p. 24.
S. Bartolini (2005) Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring Between the Nation-State and the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. xiii.
J. G. Ruggie (1993) ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,’ International Organization 47, no. 1, p. 151.
J. Caporaso 1996) ‘The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, no. 1, p. 31.
J. Zielonka (2006) Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. v.
R. B. J. Walker (2000) ‘Europe Is Not Where It Is Supposed to Be,’ in M. Kelstrup and M. Williams (eds.) International Relations and the Politics of European Integration (London and New York: Routledge), p. 21.
T. Diez, I. Manners, and R. G. Whitman (2011) ‘The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union,’ Journal of European Integration 33, no. 2, pp. 117–38.
H. Bull (1995) The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd ed. (Houndmills and London: Macmillan), pp. 97–222.
T. Diez (2012) ‘Not Quite “Sui Generis” Enough.’ Interrogating European Values,’ European Societies 14, no. 4, pp. 522–39.
T. Diez (1995) Neues Europa, altes Modell: Die Konstruktion von Staatlichkeit im politischen Diskurs der europäischen Gemeinschaft (Frankfurt: Haag and Herchen), p. 1.
R. Devetak (1995) ‘Incomplete States: Theories and Practices of Statecraft,’ in J. Macmillan and A. Linklater (eds.) Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations (London: Pinter Publishers), p. 20.
C. B. Macpherson (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: From Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
See P. Dunleavy and B. O’Leary (1987) Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy (Houndmills: Macmillan).
C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh (eds.) (2006) The State: Theories and Issues (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).
M. Weber (2004) ‘Politics as a Vocation,’ in D. Owen and T. B. Strong (eds.) R. Livingstone (trans.) The Vocation Lectures (Indianapolis: Hackett), pp. 32–94.
E. Laclau and C. Mouffe (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Verso).
R. K. Ashley (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematic,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17, no. 2, pp. 227–62.
R. K. Ashley (1989) ‘Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War,’ in J. D. Derian and M. J. Shapiro (eds.) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books), pp. 259–321.
T. Mitchell (1991) ‘The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics,’ American Political Science Review 85, no. 1, pp. 77–96.
D. Campbell (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
C. Weber (1998) ‘Performative States,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27, no.1, pp. 77–95.
A. Finlayson and J. Martin (2006) ‘Poststructuralism,’ in C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh (eds.) The State: Theories and Issues (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 155–71.
M. Foucault (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79, in M. Senellart (ed.) G. Burchell (trans.) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 77.
T. Diez (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse,’ Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4, pp. 600–2.
J. Austin (1962) How To Do Things with Words (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
J. Derrida (2002) ‘Declarations of Independence,’ in E. Rottenberg (ed.) E. Rottenberg (trans.) Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews 1971–2001 (Stanford University Press: Stanford), pp. 46–54.
M. Foucault (1990) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, Robert Hurley (trans.) (New York: Vintage Books), pp. 88–9.
J. Rouse (1994) ‘Power/Knowledge,’ in G. Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 99.
E. Ringmar (1996) ‘On the Ontological Status of the State,’ European Journal of International Relations 2, no. 4, pp. 439–66.
Y. Lapid (2001) ‘Identities, Borders, Orders: Nudging International Relations Theory in a New Direction,’ in M. Albert, D. Jacobson and Y. Lapid (eds.) Identities, Borders, Orders — Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), p. 2.
J. Butler (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York and London: Routledge).
J. Bartelson (1998) ‘Second Natures: Is the State Identical with Itself?,’ European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 3, pp. 295–326.
J. Derrida (1992) The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe, P-A. Brault and M. B. Naas (trans.) (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), p. 9.
M. Dillon (1996) Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought (London and New York: Routledge), p. 7.
S. Toulmin (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
M. C. Williams (1998) ‘Identity and the Politics of Security,’ European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 2, pp. 204–25.
C. Davis (2005) ‘Etat Present: Hauntology, Spectres and Phantoms,’ French Studies LIX, no. 3, p. 373.
T. Hobbes (1991) Leviathan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
H. Staten (1986) Wittgenstein and Derrida (Lincoln: University of Nebraska).
M. Waltzer (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books), p. 62.
A. Burke (2007) Beyond Security, Ethics and Violence: War Against the Other (London and New York: Routledge).
M. Albert and L. Brock (2001), ‘What Keeps Westphalia Together? Normative Differentiation in the Modern System of States,’ in M. Albert, D. Jacobson and Y. Lapid (eds.) Identities, Borders, Orders. Rethinking International Relations Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
R. B. J. Walker (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 62–63.
C. Brown (1992) International Relations: New Normative Approaches (New York and Oxford: Columbia University Press).
N. Inayatullah and D. Blaney (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference (London and New York: Routledge).
J. Agnew (1994) ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory,’ Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 1, p. 54.
David Campbell (1994) ‘The Deterritorialization of Responsibility: Levinas, Derrida, and Ethics After the End of Philosophy’, Alternatives, 19, no. 4, pp. 455–84.
R. L. Doty (2006) ‘Fronteras Compasivas and the Ethics of Unconditional Hospitality,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35, no. 1, pp. 53–74.
S. P. Huntington (2004) Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity (New York: Simon and Schuster).
S. Elbe (2003) Europe. A Nietzschean Perspective (London and New York: Routledge).
S. Elbe (2002) ‘“Labyrinths of the Future”: Nietzsche’s Genealogy of European Nationalism,’ Journal of Political Ideologies 7, no. 1, p. 78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Stefan Borg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borg, S. (2015). The Question of a European Union ‘Beyond the State’. In: European Integration and the Problem of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409331_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409331_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48861-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40933-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)