Skip to main content
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

EquationSource% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn % hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr % 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq-Jc9 % vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0-yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr-x % fr-xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGaaGymaiaaic % dacqGHRaWkcaaIXaGaey4kaSIaaGymaiaac+cacaaIXaGaaGimaiab % gUcaRiaaigdacaGGVaGaaGymaiaaicdacaaIWaGaey4kaSIaaGymai % aac+cacaaIXaGaaiilaiaaicdacaaIWaGaaGimaiabgUcaRiaaigda % caGGVaGaaGymaiaaicdacaGGSaGaaGimaiaaicdacaaIWaGaey4kaS % sbaeqabiqaaaqaaiablAcilbqaaiabl+Uimbaadaqadaqaaiaadkea % caWGVbGaamOCaiaadEgacaWGLbGaam4CaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaa!58DC!></EquationSource><EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[$$10 + 1 + 1/10 + 1/100 + 1/1,000 + 1/10,000 + \matrix \ldots \\ \cdots \\ \endmatrix \left( {Borges} \right)$$

In “Avatars of the Tortoise”, Borges recalls the story of Achilles and the Tortoise, which is used to explain Zeno’s second paradox, which runs as follows: because Achilles runs ten times faster than the tortoise, he gives the animal a head start of ten metres. So the chase begins: Achilles runs the ten metres, while the tortoise runs just one; Achilles runs that one metre, while the tortoise runs ten centimetres; Achilles runs the ten centimetres, while the tortoise runs one centimetre; and so on to infinity. Achilles never catches the tortoise, but merely reduces the distance between them. Borges concludes that “there is a concept which corrupts and upsets all others. I refer not to Evil, whose limited realm is that of ethics; I refer to the infinite.”1 The infinite, for Achilles, is the point at which he recognises that the gap between him and the tortoise, however far it diminishes, can never be closed. Lacan uses the same example to differentiate between two types of noncoincidence: between the subject and the Other, and between the two sexes. On the noncoincidence between subject and Other, Lacan emphasises that the tortoise is no less subordinated to this regresses infinitum than Achilles; the tortoise infinitely moves away through diminishing increments. Neither subject nor Other “arrives” then at a limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, ed. by Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. by Bruce Fink (New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1999), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forestier, cited in Durham , Double Takes: Culture and Gender in French Films and their American Remakes (Hanover: University Press of New England, 1998), 180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Daniel Varndell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Varndell, D. (2014). Transnational Remaking. In: Hollywood Remakes, Deleuze and the Grandfather Paradox. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408600_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics