Abstract
Both cancer, which can be life-threatening, and its treatment, which can be life-saving, contribute to bodily degeneration and social and emotional disruption. Rehabilitation through biotechnology can support new lives and assist people in coping with any acquired disability in the process of and after treatment. This entails repair, which utilizes different sorts of objects to improve the body’s natural capabilities in its new state. Cancer patients’ experiences of rehabilitation may vary from the definition of rehabilitation offered by professional and family healthcare givers. Rehabilitation of cancer victims generally involves helping them to obtain maximum physical, social, psychological, and vocational functioning and independence within the limits imposed by the disease and its treatment (DeLisa 2001, p. 770; Romano et al. 2006). The techniques for restoring well-being may even endow the persons using them with extra abilities that they may not have had before diagnosis of the disease, treatment, and rehabilitation processes (cf. President’s Council Report 2003; Hogle 2005). By granting individuals extra qualities in spite of their acquired disabilities, the rehabilitation of body functions and images may go beyond what is considered therapeutic. Nevertheless, despite this potential for ‘enhancement’, prostheses and other artificial rehabilitative technologies act as constant reminders of the initial loss of identity and pre-morbidity functions, as individuals either experience inconvenience using them or through them relive their pre-rehabilitation suffering.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bachelor, D. (2001): Hair and cancer chemotherapy: Consequences and nursing care — A literature study, In: European Journal of Cancer Care, 10, pp. 147–163.
Becker, G. and Kaufman, S. R. (1995): Managing an uncertain illness trajectory in old age: Patients’ and physicians’ views of stroke. In: Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9(2), pp. 165–187.
Bury, M. (1982): Chronic illness as a biographical disruption. In: Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, pp. 167–182.
Carricaburu, D. and Pierret, J. (1995): From biographical disruption to biographical reinforcement: The case of HIV-positive men. In: Sociology of Health & Illness, 17(1), pp. 65–88.
Cheville, A. L. (2005): Cancer rehabilitation. In: Seminars in Oncology, 32, pp. 219–224.
Cumming, J. and Cumming, E. (1965): On the stigma of mental illness. In: Community Mental Health Journal, 11, pp. 135–143.
DeGrazia, D. (2005): Enhancement technologies and human identity. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30, pp. 261–283.
DeLisa, J. A. (2001): A history of cancer rehabilitation. In: Cancer, 92, pp. 970–974.
Dietz, J. H. (1974): Rehabilitation of the cancer patient: Its role in the scheme of comprehensive care. In: Clinical Bulletin, 4(3), pp. 104–107.
Fialka-Moser, V., Crevenna, R., Korpan, M. and Quittan, M. (2003): Cancer rehabilitation: particularly with aspects on physical impairments. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, pp. 153–162.
Fife, B. and Wright, E. (2000): The dimensionality of stigma: A comparison of its impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer. In: Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(1), pp. 50–67.
Gilmore, N. and Somerville, M. A. (1994): Stigmatization, scapegoating, and discrimination in sexually transmitted diseases: Overcoming ‘Them’ and ‘Us’. In: Social Science and Medicine, 39, pp. 1339–1358.
Githinji, P (2012): Deacons Kenya Limited Unveils Products for Breast Cancer Survivors, http://kehpca.org/deacons-kenya-limited-unveils-products-for-breast-cancer-survivors/, date accessed 20 October 2013.
Goffman, E. (1963): Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hansen, H. P. (2007): Hair loss induced by chemotherapy: An anthropological study of women, cancer and rehabilitation. In: Anthropology and Medicine, 14(1), pp. 15–26.
Hogle, L. F. (2005): Enhancement technologies and the body. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, pp. 695–716.
Janzen, J. M. (1987): Therapy management: Concept, reality, process. In: Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1), pp. 68–84.
Karakasidou, A. (2009): Modern aesthetics and the cancerous body reconstructed. In: Tijdschrift Medische Anthropologie, 21(1), pp. 107–116.
Larsen, G. L. (1982): Rehabilitation for the patient with head and neck cancer. In: The American Journal of Nursing, 82(1), pp. 119–121.
Maguire, P. and Parkes, C. M. (1998): Coping with loss: Surgery and loss of body parts. In: British Medical Journal, 4(316), pp. 1086–1088.
Manderson, L. (1999): Gender, normality and post-surgical body. In: Anthropology and Medicine, 6(3), pp. 381–394.
Mikkelsen, T. H., Søndergaard, J., Jensen, A. B. and Olesen, F. (2008): Cancer rehabilitation: Psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? A qualitative interview study. In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 26, pp. 216–221.
Murray, C. D. (2005): The social meanings of prosthesis use. In: Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), pp. 425–441.
Mutuma, G. Z. and Ruggut-Korir, A. (2006): Cancer incidence report. Nairobi 2000–2002. In: Nairobi Cancer Registry, Kenya: Kenya Medical Research Institute.
Ory, M. G. and Williams, T. F. (1989): Rehabilitation: Small goals, sustained interventions. In: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 503(1), pp. 60–71.
O’Toole, D. M. and Golden, A. M. (1991): Evaluating cancer patients for rehabilitation potential. In: The Western Journal of Medicine, 155(4), pp. 384–387.
Parkes, C. M. (1975): Psycho-social transitions: Comparison between reactions to loss of a limb and loss of a spouse. In: British Journal of Psychiatry, 127, pp. 204–210.
President’s Council on Bioethics (2003): Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness, http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/beyondtherapy/beyond_therapy_final_webcorrected.pdf, date accessed 20 August 2012.
Republic of Kenya (2010): National Cancer Control Strategy. 2011–2016. Nairobi: Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation and Ministry of Medical Services.
Romano, G., Bianco, F. and Ciorra, G. (2006): Total anorectal reconstruction with an artificial bowel sphincter. In: Delaini, G. G. (ed.) Rectal Cancer: New Frontiers in Diagnosis, Treatment and Rehabilitation. Milan: Springer, pp. 178–182.
Rosman, S. (2004): Cancer and stigma: Experience of patients with chemotherapy induced alopecia. In: Patient Education and Counseling, 52(3), pp. 333–339.
Sansom, C. and Mutuma, G. (2002): Kenya faces cancer challenge. In: Lancet Oncology, 3(8), pp. 456–458.
Scheper-Hughes, N. and Lock, M. M. (1987): The mindful body: A prolegomenon to the future in medical anthropology. In: Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1(1), pp. 6–41.
Sontag, S. (2001): Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors. London: Vintage.
Stoller, P. (2004): Stranger in the Village of the Sick. A Memoir of Cancer, Sorcery, and Healing. Boston: Beacon Press.
Synnott, A. (1993): The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society. London: Routledge.
Van Dongen, E. (2008): Keeping the feet of the gods and the saints warm: Mundane pragmatics in times of suffering and uncertainty. In: Anthropology & Medicine, 15(3), pp. 263–269.
Warren, N. and Manderson, L. (2008): Constructing hope: Dis/continuity and the narrative construction of recovery in the rehabilitation unit. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, pp. 180–201.
Watson, P. G. (1992): The optimal functioning plan: A key element in cancer rehabilitation. In: Cancer Nursing, 15, pp. 254–263.
Williamson, G. M., Shultz, R., Bridges, M. W. and Behan, A. M. (1994): Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. In: Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 9, pp. 249–268.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Benson A. Mulemi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mulemi, B.A. (2014). Token of Loss: Enthography of Cancer Rehabilitation and Restoration of Affected Lives in Kenya. In: Eilers, M., Grüber, K., Rehmann-Sutter, C. (eds) The Human Enhancement Debate and Disability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405531_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137405531_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48775-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40553-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)