Abstract
The ‘electronic logbook’ (EL) is a penitentiary tool created in 2009 by three prison guards. This software application makes it possible to continually record and intensively circulate information on day-to-day events in prison, generating forms of knowledge on prisoners — key components of behavioural control.1 The prison administration is currently trying to bring the EL into widespread use, arguing that since this system individualises the handling of detained persons, its implementation helps bring French prisons into conformity with the European Prison Rules (EPR). At the same time, the EL has been attacked by activists engaging in the ‘legal guerrilla warfare’ (Chantraine and Kaminski, 2007) that in part characterises contemporary militant activism in the prison sphere. Thus, taking advantage of a window of opportunity left open when the prison administration delayed having the tool approved by the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL), International Prison Watch lodged an unsuccessful complaint with this body in late 2009, demanding that the system be abrogated, to stop what it viewed as the ‘collection of sensitive personal data […] operating outside of any legal framework’.2
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Bérard, J. and Chantraine, G. (2013) Bastille Nation. French Penal Politics and the Punitive Turn (Carleton: Red Quill Books Edition).
Chantraine, G. and Sallée, N. (2015) ‘Educate and Punish. Educational Work, Security and Discipline in Prisons for Minors’, Revue française de sociologie, 54, 3, English issue, 437–61.
Chantraine, G., Scheer, D. and Milhaud, O. (2012) ‘Space and Surveillance in a Prison for Minors’, Politix, 97, 1, English issue, 125–48.
Sallée, N. (2014) ‘Juvenile Delinquents Educated Under Constraint: Responsabilisation, Discipline and the Return to a Republican Utopia in the French Youth Justice System’, Déviance et société, 38, 1, French issue, 77–101.
References
Acker, F. (1997) ‘Sortir de l’invisibilité — Le cas du travail infirmer’, Raisons Pratiques, 8, 65–94.
Boutet, J. (1993) ‘Quelques propriétés des écrits au travail’, Langage et Travail, 6, 18–25.
Chantraine, G. (2004) ‘Prison and Sociological Perspective’, Champ pénal/Penal field, I, http://champpenal.revues.org/238.
Chantraine, G. (2013) ‘Prisons Under the Lens of Ethnographic Criticism’, Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 1, 30–1.
Chantraine, G. and Kaminski, D. (2007) ‘La Politique des Droits en Prison’, Champ pénal/Penal field, http://champpenal.revues.org/2581.
Chantraine, G., Scheer, D. and Milhaud, O. (2012) ‘Espace et surveillances en établisse-ment pénitentiaire pour mineurs’, Politix, 1, 97, 125–48.
Chantraine, G. and Sallée, N. (2014) ‘Educate and Punish: Educational Work, Security and Discipline in Prisons for Minors’, Revue française de sociologie, 54, 3, 437–64.
Chantraine, G. (ed) avec Sallée, N., Scheer, D., Salle, G., Franssen, A. and Cliquen-nois, G. (2011) Les prisons pour mineurs: Controverses sociales, pratiques professionnelles, expériences de réclusion, rapport pour la mission de recherche (Droit et Justice: Clersé, 534).
Chauvenet, A. (1996) ‘L’échange et la prison’, in C. Faugeron, A. Chauvenet and A. Combessie (eds) Approches de la prison, pp. 45–70 (Bruxelles: De Boeck Université, Bruxellles).
Chauvenet, A., Orlic, F. and Benguigui, G. (1994) Le Monde des surveillants de prison (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).
Chauvenet, A., Rostaing, C. and Orlic, F. (2008) La violence carcérale en question (Paris: PUF).
Cliquennois, G. and Chantraine, G. (2009) ‘Empêcher le Suicide en Prison: Origines et Pratiques’, Sociétés Contemporaines, 75, 3, 59–79.
Conein, B. (1997) ‘L’action avec les objets: Un autre visage de l’action située?’, in B. Conein and L. Thévenot (eds) Cognition et information en société. Raisons pratiques n°8 (Paris: EHESS).
Crewe, B. (2009) The Prisoner Society. Prison, Adaptation, and Social Life in an English Prison (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Crewe, B. (2011) ‘Soft Power in Prison: Implications for Staff-Prisoner Relationships, Liberty and Legitimacy’, European Journal of Criminology, 8, 6, 455–68.
Demonchy, C. (2004) ‘L’architecture des prisons modèles françaises’, in P. Artières and P. Lascoumes (eds) Gouverner et enfermer: La prison, un modèle indépassable? (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po).
Fassin, D. and Bourdelais, P. (ed) (2005) Les constructions de l’intolérable. Etudes d’anthropologie et d’histoire sur les frontières de l’espace moral (Paris: La Découverte).
Fraenkel, B. (1993) ‘La traçabilité, une fonction caractéristique des écrits au travail’, Langage et Travail, 6, 26–38.
Fraenkel, B. (2007) ‘Actes d’écriture: Quand écrire c’est faire’, Langage et Société, 3–4, 101–12.
Goffman, E. (1975/1963) Les usages sociaux du handicap (Paris: Minuit).
Grosjean, M. and Lacoste, M. (1999) ‘L’oral et l’écrit dans les communications de travail ou les illusions du ‘tout écrit’, Sociologie du travail, 98, 4, 439–61.
Hancock, P. and Jewkes, Y. (2011) ‘Architectures of Incarceration? The Spatial Pains of Imprisonment’, Punishment & Society, 13, 5, 611–29.
Jobard, F. and Linhart, D. (2011) ‘Surveillance libérale et surveillance souveraine’, in S. Leman-Langlois (ed) Sphères de surveillance, pp. 103–36 (Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal).
Johnston, N. J. (2000) Forms of Constraint: A History of Prison Architecture (Champaign: University of Illinois Press).
Laé, J. F. (2008) Les nuits de la main courante: Ecritures au travail (Paris: Stock).
Lahanier-Reuter, D. (2010) ‘Livrets de bord et travail des enseignants du second degré’, Langage et Société, 134, 55–78.
Latour, B. and Hermant, E. (1998) Paris ville invisible (Paris: Les empêcheurs de penser en rond/La Découverte).
Le Bianic, T. and Malochet, G. (2011) ‘Soigner, évaluer, controller: Les dilemmes des soignants en milieu carcéral’, in G. Benguigui, F. Guilbaud and Malochet, G. (eds) Prisons sous tensions, pp. 221–47 (Nîmes: Champ Social).
Leman-Langlois, S. (ed) Sphères de surveillance (Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal).
Liebling, A. (2000) ‘Prisons officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion’, Theoretical Criminology, 4, 3, 333–57.
Liebling, A. and Price, D. (2001) The Prison Officer (Winchester: Waterside Press)
Mbanzoulou, P. (ed) (2011) L’architecture carcérale (Paris: L’Harmattan).
Mbodj-Pouye, A. (2009) ‘Tenir un cahier dans la région cotonnière du Mali: Support d’écriture et rapport à soi’, Annales HSS, 4, 855–85.
McCleery, R. (1960) ‘Communications Patterns as Bases of Systems of Authority and Power’, in R. A. Cloward (ed) Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison, pp. 49–77 (New York: Social Science Research Council).
Milhaud, O. (2009) Séparer et punir. Les prisons françaises: mise à distance et punition par l’espace (Bordeaux: Thèse de l’Université de Bordeaux).
Mills, C. W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination (London: Oxford University Press).
Norman, D. A. (1991) ‘Cognitive Artifacts’, in John M. Carroll (ed) Designing Interaction, pp. 17–38 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Rostaing, C. (2007) ‘Processus de judiciarisation carcérale: Le droit en prison, une ressource pour les acteurs?’ Droit et Société, 67, 577–95.
Sallée, N. (2010) ‘Les éducateurs de la Protection judiciaire de la jeunesse à l’épreuve de l’évolution du traitement pénal des jeunes délinquants’, Champ pénal/Pénal field, VII, http://champpenal.revues.org/7756.
Simon, J., Temple, N. and Tobe, R. (eds) (2012) Architecture and Justice (Ashgate: London).
Wacquant, L. (2002) ‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration’, Ethnography, 3, 371–97.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Gilles Chantraine and Nicolas Sallée
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chantraine, G., Sallée, N. (2015). Ethnography of Writings in Prison: Professional Power Struggles Surrounding a Digital Notebook in a Prison for Minors. In: Drake, D.H., Earle, R., Sloan, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403889_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403889_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68058-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40388-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)