Skip to main content

Deviation and Limitations of (Prison) Ethnography: Postscript to Fieldwork in an Indian Prison

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

Incarceration is extremely hard to document ethnographically. Social anthropology with its ethnographic method possibly offers an expedient way of representing spaces of incarceration and expressing marginalised voices within them. These statements express the inherently paradoxical encounter between ethnography and prisons. Rhodes (2001), in a path-breaking review essay on the anthropology of prisons, argued that there is a need for prison ethnographers not just to get inside prisons and describe life within prison walls, but more significantly to ‘interrupt the terms of the debate’ (2001: 75). Wacquant (2002) articulated otherwise: that in a context of eclipsed prison ethnography, it is more important for ethnographers to enter prisons and fill the void in the literature on prisons, through ‘thick descriptions’ of a range of different kinds of carceral spaces. In this chapter, such observations about the anthropology of prisons form a backdrop for reflections on their methodological import for prison ethnographers.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Jewkes, Y. (2013) ‘What Can Ethnography Offer in an Age of Mass Incarceration?’ Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 1, 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2001) ‘Whose Side Are We On?: Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research’, British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2001) ‘Toward an Anthropology of Prisons’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison (California: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2002) ‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration’, Ethnography, 3, 4, 371–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  • Arnold, D. (2007) India: ‘The Contested Prison’, in Dikotter, F. and Brown, I. (eds) Cultures of Confinement: A History of the Prison in Africa, Asia and Latin America (New York: Cornell University Press), pp. 147–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, M. (2010) Everyday Life in a Prison: Confinement, Surveillance, Resistance (New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Gans, H. J., Newan, K. S. and Vaughan, D. (2004) ‘On the Value of Ethnography: Sociology and Public Policy: A Dialogue’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595, 264–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (2005) ‘Doing Prison Research: Views from Inside’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 249–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. (2007) ‘South East Asia: Reform and the Colonial Prison’, in F. Dikotter and I. Brown (eds) Cultures of Confinement: A History of the Prison in Africa, Asia and Latin America, pp. 221–68 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, U. (2007) ‘Becoming a Nonexpert and Other Strategies for Managing Fieldwork Dilemmas in the Criminal Justice System’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36, 704–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R., Fretz, R. and Shaw, L. (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inciardi, J. A. (1993) ‘Some Considerations on the Methods, Dangers and Ethics of Crack House Research’, in J. A. Inciardi, D. Lockwood and A. E. Pottieger (eds) Women and Crack Cocaine (NewYork: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, A. M. (2005) ‘Reforming Nigerian Prisons: Rebuilding a “Deviant” State’, British Journal of Criminology, 45, 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2012) ‘Autoethnography and Emotion as Intellectual Resources: Doing Prison Research Differently’, Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2013) ‘What Can Ethnography Offer in an Age of Mass Incarceration?’ Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 1, 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2001) ‘Whose Side Are We On? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research’, British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., Price, D. and Shefer, G. (2011) The Prison Officer (Cullompton: Willan Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendy, J. P. (2006) ‘I’m Very Careful about That: Narrative and Agency of Men in Prison’, Discourse Society, 17, 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. (2009) ‘Notes toward an Ethnographic Memoir of Supervising Graduate Research through Anthropology’s Decades of Transformation’, in J. D. Faubion and G. E. Marcus (eds) Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, pp. 1–34 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2014) ‘Reasonable Caning and the Embrace of Human Rights in Ugandan Prisons’, Focaal, 68, 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M., Jefferson, A M. and Bandyopadhyay, M. (2014) ‘Sensing Prison Climates: Governance, Survival, and Transition’, Focaal, 68, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moczydlowski, P. (1992) The Hidden Life of Polish Prisons (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (1998) In the Mix: Struggle and Survival in a Women’s Prison (New York: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piacentini, L. (2004) Surviving Russian Prisons: Punishment Economy and Politics in Transition (Cullompton: Willian Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A. (2004) Papua New Guinea’s Last Place: Experiences of Constraint in a Postcolonial Prison (Oxford: Berghahn Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, C. (2010) ‘A Difficult Negotiation: Fieldwork Relations with Gatekeepers’, Qualitative Research, 10, 3, 315–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2001) ‘Toward an Anthropology of Prisons’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. A. (2004) Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison (California: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2009) ‘Ethnography in Sites of Total Confinement’, Anthropology News, 50, 1, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vered, A. (eds) (2000) Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2002) ‘The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration’, Ethnography, 3, 4, 371–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldram, J. B. (2009) ‘“It’s Just You and Satan, Hanging Out at a Pre-School”: Notions of Evil and the Rehabilitation of Sexual Offenders’, Anthropology and Humanism, 34, 2, 219–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Mahuya Bandyopadhyay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandyopadhyay, M. (2015). Deviation and Limitations of (Prison) Ethnography: Postscript to Fieldwork in an Indian Prison. In: Drake, D.H., Earle, R., Sloan, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403889_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics