Skip to main content
  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

The forms of PPPs may change and evolve over time, but the purpose of social innovations in seeking a good way of life and the intention to serve the common good beyond private interests can last long. Then, in Chapter 7, the rice industry case in the post-WTO global competition environment presents how small-scale rice farming and production might find a new form of agricultural collaboration, and later extends its uniqueness by building up a common geographic trademark for a rice brand owned by the local public, and eventually spillover the spirit of social innovations into other local values beyond rice production. This case demonstrates that several PPP forms and partnerships can be adopted from time to time, but always aligning with the purpose of the concurrent goal of common achievements, given the small or big scope of “common” achievements. On the other hand, in the last case in Chapter 8, a rural community case presents the common initiatives to start in an alternative direction, by taking advantage of the PPP with the public-sector program and generating more values beyond it. Eventually, the common good of a sustainable agricultural sixth industrial revolution can achieve a pure good dream of the rural hometown with its own sustainable businesses, regardless of the future availability of the public-sector resources. All the five cases provide demonstrations of how private and public interests can be linked in the short run or can be coevolved over the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. 1998. Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1): 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. 2006. Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2): 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2): 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. 2012a. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41: 726–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. 2012b. Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41: 929–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., & Üstün, T. B. 1999. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48: 1173–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4): 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. 2012. Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T. 2013. http://twstreetcorner.org/2013/10/30/chendungsheng-2/

  • Chen, D. S. 2012. Communitarian governance and social innovation. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 49: 1–40. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., & Davidson, W. S. 1986. An introduction to community experimentation: Theory methods and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyu, M., & Damon, W. 2001. Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Googins, B. K., & Rochlin, S. A. 2000. Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1): 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S.-C, Morris, S. S., & Snell, S. A. 2007. Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. 2007. Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 889–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., & Makain, S. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: Moving beyond investment towards measuring outcomes. European Management Journal, 22(5): 508–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2012. A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3): 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. 2010. (Re)forming strategic cross sector partnerships: Relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49(1): 140–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. 2007. Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K., & Vogel, C. M. 1997. Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2): 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A., & Ngo, L. V. 2010. Examining the firm’s value creation process: A managerial perspective of the firm’s value offering strategy and performance. British Journal of Management, 22(4): 646–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R. N., & Marion, R. 2009. Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliance. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall: 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, December: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2006. Strategy & society. Harvard Business Review, December: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putrevu, S., McGuire, J., Sieger, D. S., & Smith, D. M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility, irresponsibility, and corruption: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Business Research, 65(11): 1618–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rethemeyer, R. K. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring collaborative networks. Public Administration Review, 64(6): 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santos, M., Rufin, C, & Kolk, A. 2012. Bridging the institutional divide: Partnerships in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12): 1721–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. 2009. Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J., & Parker, B. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31: 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Varcoe, C, & Edwards, N. 2005. Turning around the intergenerational impact of residential schools on aboriginal people: Implications for health policy and practice. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 37(4): 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. 2010. The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5): 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11): 1991–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. 1988. Building successful social partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 29(4): 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther, Jr. W. B., & Chandler, D. 2005. Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4): 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 I Han and Sheng-Tsung Hou

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, I., Hou, ST. (2016). Theoretical Implications. In: Social Innovation and Business in Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403810_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics