Conclusions: The Impact of International Norms on Islamist Politics
Before presenting the concluding observation of this study, it may be useful to recapitulate briefly its overall argument. Chapters 2 and 3 examined the communitarian and Islamist critiques of the diffusion of liberal norms, principles, and institutions, both internationally and within the realm of domestic politics and societies. Chapter 4 has shown that com-munitarianism and Islamism are critical of liberalism in similar ways not by coincidence, but because they rely on analogous conceptions of community and person. The comparative analysis of these conceptions highlighted their commonalities and concluded that Islamism can be understood as part of the wider tradition of communitarian political theory.
KeywordsMoral Reasoning International Norm Political Identity Instrumental Rationality International Peace
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett, Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, BCSIA studies in international security (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), pp. 120–3.Google Scholar
- 3.Kenneth Neal Waltz, Theory of international politics, Addison-Wesley series in political science (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979), p. 52. As regards the socialization of non-conformist states, see also ibid., pp. 126–7.Google Scholar
- 4.Hedley Bull and Adam Watson, The expansion of international society (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984).Google Scholar
- 6.G. John Ikenberry and Charles A. Kupchan, “Socialization and hegemonic power,” International Organization 44, no. 3 (1990): pp. 289–90.Google Scholar
- 8.Thomas Risse-Kappen and Kathryn Sikkink, “The socialisation of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction,” in The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change, ed. Thomas Risse-Kappen, Steve C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.See for a similar argument, the work of Martha Finnemore on the diffusion of a norm of humanitarian intervention in which she claims that the “the second half of the twentieth century norms about who was ‘human’ had changed, expanding the population deserving of humanitarian protection.” Martha Finnemore, “Constructing norms of humanitarian intervention,” in The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 184.Google Scholar
- 23.With specific reference to Hezbollah, Bayat notices that this process is far from being accomplished, a point with which I fully agree and that is in contrast with Alagha’s view. Ibid., pp. 17–18; Joseph Alagha, “Hizbullah’s infi-tah: a Post-Islamist Turn?,” in Post-Islamism: the changing faces of political Islam, ed. Asef Bayat (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
- 35.Dennis Ross and David Makovsky, Myths, illusions, and peace: finding a new direction for America in the Middle East (New York: Viking, 2009), p. 267.Google Scholar
- 36.Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam: the search for a new Ummah, The CERI series in comparative politics and international studies (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004);Google Scholar