Skip to main content

‘Construe My Meaning’: Performance, Poetry and Semiotic Distance

  • Chapter
Society in Language, Language in Society
  • 931 Accesses

Abstract

These words, quoted from the Elizabethan madrigal by Giles Farnaby (1560–1640), evoke for me many of the dimensions of the thought and linguistic technique of Ruqaiya Hasan (e.g. Hasan, 2007). The primary point of Hasan’s emphasis is that a linguist should work so that all that is performed in linguistic analysis demonstrates its relevance to meaning. Second, in evaluating linguistic proposals, one needs to be assiduous in thinking through the implications of the theory — what the theory carries by way of its own meanings. Throughout Hasan’s semantic odyssey, there are then at least two levels of meaning for construe: it applies to the cultural and linguistic meaning under investigation through wording; and to the theoretical meanings that we bring with our modes of enquiry, and which are inherent in the terms of representation that we employ. With respect to the latter, ‘wrest not my method’ is also relevant: namely, do not take my method from me, or turn it to different purposes (more archaic).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bateson, G. (1980) Mind and Nature: a Necessary Unity (Waukegan, Ill.: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmur, R. P. (1957) Form and Value in Modern Poetry (New York: Doubleday Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: a Theory of Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowcher, W. and Smith, B. (eds) (2014) Systemic Phonology: Recent Studies in English (Sheffield: Equinox).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. (1983) ‘Semantic “drift” in verbal art’. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. (1985) Talking and Thinking: the Patterns of Behaviour (Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. (1988) ‘Randomness, order and the latent patterning of text’. In D. Birch and M. O’Toole (eds) Functions of Style (London: Pinter), pp. 74–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. G. (2007) ‘Thought experiments in verbal art: examples from modernism’. In D. R. Miller and M. Turci (eds) Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature (London, Equinox), pp. 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D. G., Moore, A. R., Henderson-Brooks, C., Meares, R. and Haliburn, Joan (2010) ‘Dissociation, relatedness and “cohesive harmony”: a linguistic measure of degrees of “fragmentation”’. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (3): 263–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, D., Moore, A. and Henderson-Brooks, C. (2012) ‘Discourse correlates of therapeutic method and patient progress’. In R. Meares (ed.) Borderline Personality Disorder Treated by the Conversational Model: a Clinician’s Manual (New York: Norton Interpersonal Neurobiology Books), pp. 267–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cléirigh, C. (1998) ‘A selectionist model of the genesis of phonic texture’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloran, C. (1995) ‘Defining and relating text segments: subject and theme in discourse’. In R. Hasan and P. Fries (eds) On Subject and Theme: a Discourse Functional Perspective (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 361–403.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2012) Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain (London: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1992) ‘Prosodic cohesion in a systemic perspective: Philip Larkin reading “Toads Revisited”’. In P. Tench (ed.) Studies in Systemic Phonology (London: Pinter), pp. 255–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1993) ‘Theme, tonality and lineation in Shakespeare’s “Sonnets”’. Paper given at the Second European Society for the Study of English Conference, Bordeaux, 4–8 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. L. (1983) ‘The Parry-Lord theory meets operational structuralism’. The Journal of American Folklore 96 (380): 151–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Menoufy, A. M. E. S. (1969) ‘A study of the role of intonation in the grammar of English’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1957) Papers in Linguistics: 1934–1951 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1975) ‘The strategy of fusion: Dylan Thomas’s syntax’. In R. Fowler (ed.) Style and Structure in Literature: Essays in the New Stylistics (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H.-J. (1996) A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) Spoken and Written Language (Geelong: Deakin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2005) ‘A systemic interpretation of Peking syllables’. In J. J. Webster (ed.) The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 8: Studies in Chinese Language (London and New York: Continuum), pp. 294–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. and Greaves, W. (2008) Intonation in the Grammar of English (London and New York: Equinox).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th edn) (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. and Webster, J. J. (2014) ‘Visualizing the architexture of the text: analyzing Obama’s first inaugural address and Nixon’s second inaugural address’. In M. A. K. Halliday and J. J. Webster (eds) Text Linguistics: the How and Why of Meaning (London: Equinox), pp. 272–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1964) ‘A linguistic study of contrasting features in the style of two contemporary English prose writers’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1968) ‘Linguistics and the study of literature’. Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1971) ‘Rime and reason in literature’. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style: a Symposium (London: Oxford University Press), pp. 299–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1975) ‘The place of stylistics in the study of verbal art’. In H. Ringbom (ed.) Style and Text: Studies Presented to Nils Erik Enkvist (Stockholm: Skriptor), pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1979) ‘Workshop report No. 6: language in the study of literature’. In M. A. K. Halliday (ed.) Working Conference on Language in Education: Report to Participants (Sydney: University of Sydney).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1984a [1996a]) ‘Ways of saying: ways of meaning’. In R. Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, S. Lamb and A. Makkai (eds) The Semiotics of Culture and Language, Vol. 1: Language as Social Semiotic (London: Pinter), pp. 105–62. Reprinted in C. Cloran, D. Butt and G. Williams (eds) Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning (London: Cassell), pp. 191–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1984b) ‘Coherence and cohesive harmony’. In J. Flood (ed.) Understanding Reading Comprehension (Newark, Del.: IRA), pp. 181–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1985) Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art (Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (1988) ‘The analysis of one poem: theoretical issues in practice’. In D. Birch and M. O’Toole (eds) Functions of Style (London, Pinter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2007) ‘Private pleasure, public discourse: reflections on engaging with literature’. In D. R. Miller and M. Turci (eds) Language and Verbal Art Revisited: Linguistic Approaches to the Study of Literature (London, Equinox), pp. 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2011) Selected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan on Applied Linguistics (Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2014) ‘Towards a paradigmatic description of context: systems, metafunctions and semantics’. Functional Linguistics 1 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (ed.) (1987) Language in Literature (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janet, P. (1924) Principles of Psychotherapy (London: George Allen and Unwin).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kermode, F. (2004) The Age of Shakespeare (New York: Phoenix).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, K. M. (2013) ‘Cohesive harmony: exploring a measure of cohesion and coherence in psychotherapy’. Unpublished honours thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner, A. (2014) ‘Analogical fit: dynamic relatedness in the psychotherapeutic setting’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanham, R. A. (1991) A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (2nd edn) (Berkeley and London: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. R. (1976) ‘Concerning what kind of speech act a poem is’. In T. van Dijk (ed.) Pragmatics of Language and Literature (North Holland Studies in Theoretical Poetics, Vol. 2) (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, A. (2003). ‘Examining poetry: a corpus based enquiry into literary criticism’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, A. and Webster, J. (2005) ‘SFL and the study of literature’. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds) Continuing Discourse on Language (Vol. 1) (London: Equinox), pp. 413–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, A. (1963) ‘“As you like it”: a grammatical clue to character’. Review of English Literature 4: 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, K. (2010) Phasal Analysis: Analysing Discourse through Communication Linguistics (London and New York: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Thompson, S. A. (1992) ‘Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis’. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds) Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text (Amsterdam: Benjamins), pp. 39–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text: Systems and Structure (Amsterdam: Benjamins).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2002) ‘Combining clauses into clause complexes: a multi-faceted view’. In J. Bybee and M. Noonan (eds) Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson (Amsterdam: Benjamins), pp. 237–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, R. (2012) A Dissociation Model of Borderline Personality Disorder (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology) (New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, G. (2013) ‘Choices in Tony’s talk: phonological paragraphing, information unit nexuses and the presentation of tone units’. In G. O’Grady, T. Bartlett and L. Fontaine (eds) Choice in Language: Applications in Text Analysis (London: Equinox), pp. 125–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, R. (1964) ‘Generative grammars and the concept of literary style’. Word 20: 423–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, R. (1971) ‘Speech, action, and style in literary style’. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary Style (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 241–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. M. and Shukman, A. (1978) Formalism: History, Comparison, Genre (Russian Poetics in Translation, Vol. 5) (Oxford: Holden Books Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, A. and Biven, L. (2012) The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions (The Norton Series of Interpersonal Biology) (New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porges, S. W. (2011) The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation (The Norton Series of Interpersonal Biology) (New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. (2013) ‘A progressive line of movement in every poem: semantic progression in the poetry of Dylan Thomas’. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de (1978 [1916]) Course in General Linguistics. Edited by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye in collaboration with A. Riedlinger (Glasgow: Fontana/Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. (1984) Poets in their Youth: a Memoir (London: Pan Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, T. (1990) Missing Measures: Modern Poetry and the Revolt against Meter (Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tench, P. (1992) ‘From prosodic analysis to systemic phonology’. In P. Tench (ed.) Studies in Systemic Phonology (London and New York: Pinter), pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckwell, K. R. (1999) ‘The grammar of desire: complexity, metaphor and signification in Lacan’. BA (Hons) thesis, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voloshinov, V. N. (1929 [1986]) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonwiller, J. and Cléirigh, C. (1997) ‘Concinnity: the cohesive co-ordination of tonality and grammatical structure’. Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1998) ‘The poet’s language: foregrounding in Edwin Thumboo’s “Gods can die”?’ World Englishes 17 (3): 359–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Selection of Asian adaptations

  • Angoor (India, 1982) (Bollywood adaptation of The Comedy of Errors).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliyattam (India, 1997) (adaptation of Othello), director Jayaraaj.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannaki (India, 2002) (adaptation of Antony and Cleopatra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool (India, 2004) (adaptation of Macbeth), director Vishal Bharadwaj.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omkara (India, 2006) (adaptation of Othello), director Vishal Bharadwaj.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran (Japan, 1985) (adaptation of KingLear), director Akira Kurosawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare Must Die (Thailand, 2005): http://asiancorrespondent.com/79666/thai-macbeth-movie-banned/

  • The Bad Sleep Well (aka Warui yatsu hodo yoku nemuru) (Japan, 1960) (adaptation of Hamlet), director Akira Kurosawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Banquet (China, 2006) (adaptation of Hamlet), director Feng Xiaogang. See: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-09/05/content_5050440.htm

  • Throne of Blood (aka Cobweb Castle or Kumonosu-jo) (Japan, 1957) (adaptation of Macbeth), director Akira Kurosawa.

    Google Scholar 

Selection of criticism based on Asian perspectives

  • Ashizu, Kaori, ‘Kurosawa’s Hamlet?’ Shakespeare Studies No. 33 (1995): 71–99: http://www.s-sj.org/pdfs/St-Asizu.pdf

  • 3.6, 15 (2007): http://www.pu-kumamoto.ac.jp/~tosho/file/pdf/kbs/3/bunsai3-3.pdf

  • Coghlan, A. ‘Globe to Globe: A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare’s Globe’, theartsdesk.com (1 May 2012): http://www.theartsdesk.com/theatre/globe-globe-midsummer-nights-dream-shakespeares-globe

  • French, C. (1993) ‘Adaptation as interpretation: three versions of King Lear. Prison in theatre: confinement as a microcosm of our society’. See: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/154

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallimore, D. ‘Speaking Shakespeare in Japanese: some contemporary exponents’, in D. Kennedy and Y. L. Lan (eds) (2010) Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance (Cambridge University Press), pp. 42–56: http://www.social-sciences.brookes.ac.uk/research/centres/ejrc/downloads/speaking_shakespeare.pdf

  • Huang, A. (2003) ‘The tragic and the Chinese subject’. Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs 3(1): 55–68: http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjeaa/journal3/china4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ick, Judy Celine, ‘Performing Shakespeare in colonial Southeast Asia’. The Asian Scholar 4 (e-journal): http://www.asianscholarship.org/asf/ejourn/articles/Judy%20C%20Ick2.pdf

  • Lee, Adele, ‘Year of Shakespeare: Coriolanus’, blog post (25 May 2012): http://bloggingshakespeare.com/year-of-shakespeare-coriolanus

  • Mohanty, Sangeeta, ‘The Indian response to Hamlet: Shakespeare’s reception in India and a study of Hamlet in Sanskrit poetics’, Dissertation, Basel University (2010): edoc.unibas.ch/1168/1/finalversionJan2010.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosheen, Iqbal, ‘Much ado about Delhi: RSC’s Indian Shakespeare. Chastity, courtship, arranged marriages’, The Guardian (1 August 2012): http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2012/aug/01/much-ado-rsc-indian-shakespeare

  • Seoul Stages: ‘Some more Shakespeare in Korea’, blog post (20 October 2011): http://seoulstages.wordpress.com/2011/10/30/some-more-shakespeare-in-korea/

  • Sharma, Yojana, ‘Shakespeare with extra spice’, TES (27 April 2007): http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=2376259

  • Verma, Jatinder, ‘What the migrant saw’, The Guardian (10 January 2008): http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2008/jan/10/theatre1

  • Wu, Hui, ‘To seek revenge or to forgive: two Chinese films about Hamlet’, Shakespeare et l’Orient. 2009: http://www.societefrancaiseshakespeare.org/document.php?id=1517

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 David G. Butt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butt, D.G. (2016). ‘Construe My Meaning’: Performance, Poetry and Semiotic Distance. In: Bowcher, W.L., Liang, J.Y. (eds) Society in Language, Language in Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40286-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics