Abstract
The words “inanimate” and “object” usually trip off the tongue together. But the habit that conjoins them veils both a certain redundancy and a certain anxiety. Is not everything inanimate, by definition, an object? Could we even imagine an animate object? … Could we? The prospect of living things become objects and dead ones become acting subjects is an ontological scandal, on the one hand ethically disturbing (think: “objectification”), and on the other perversely fascinating (think: zombies). It is also the very stuff of theatre, as a generation of work on dramatic haunting, theatrical props, and feminist performance has made clear. Theatre, we are told, is a place where the dead are nightly resurrected, inert things assume “action force,” and women or minorities are routinely frozen in stereotyped roles that make them the passive objects of dramatic machinations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Margaret Werry
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Werry, M. (2014). House Arrest: Museological Performance, Animacy, and the Remains of Rural America. In: Schweitzer, M., Zerdy, J. (eds) Performing Objects and Theatrical Things. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402455_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402455_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48670-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40245-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)