Skip to main content

Organizing the Modern Firm in the Worldwide Market for Market Transactions

  • Chapter
The Multinational Enterprise and the Emergence of the Global Factory
  • 620 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Afuah, A. (2001). Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1211–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, L., & Gillespie, W. (1989). Resource coordination and transaction costs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S., & Liebskind, P. J. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (2006). Strategic management and competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreyre, P. Y. (1988). The concept of ‘impartition’ policies: A different approach to vertical integration strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). The transnational corporation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois, K. J. (1972). Vertical quasi-integration. Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(3), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K., Brouthers, L., & Werner, S. (2008). Real options, international entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 936–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Wilson, S. (2005). The black book of outsourcing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. (1988). The limits of explanation: Testing the internalization theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Lessard, D. R. (2005). Regaining the edge for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 595–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(2), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. (1991). A resource-based analysis of global competition. Strategic Management Journal, 12(SI 1), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons, J. R. (1932). The problem of correlating law, economics and ethics. Wisconsin Law Review, 8(1), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F., Kumar, V., Kundu, S., & Pedersen, T. (2010a). Global outsourcing and off-shoring: An integrated approach to theory and corporate strategy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F., Kumar, V., Kundu, S., & Pedersen, T. (2010b). Reconceptualizing the firm in a world of outsourcing and offshoring: The organizational and geographical relocation of high-value company functions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1417–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, M. (2004). The outsourcing revolution. New York: Kaplan Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (1993). Where are the theories for the ‘New’ organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 4(4), i–iv.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A., & Ravenscraft, D. J. (1994). Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1167–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T. J., Brown, R. L., & Bamford, C. E. (1998). Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: Strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 709–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, M., & Glaister, K. (2010). Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: A comparative study of developed and emerging regions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1534–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern, J., Hirscheim, R., & Jaytilaka, B. (2004). Information systems outsourcing: A survey and analysis of the literature. Database, 34(4), 6–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. (2005). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J., Bunyaratavej, K., & Hahn, E. (2009). Separable but not equal: The location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 926–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duening, T., & Click, R. (2005). Essentials of business process outsourcing. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1995). Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L., Tate, W., & Billington, C. (2007). Services supply management: The next frontier for improved organizational performance. California Management Review, 49(4), 44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D. (2006). Smarter offshoring. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner. (2008). Market trends: Procurement business process outsourcing worldwide 2008. Stamford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1999). The limits to capital (2nd ed). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A theory of the multinational enterprise. Ann-Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 500–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, T., & Hitt, M. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, P., & Richardson, J. D. (Eds.). (1991). International economic transactions: Issues in measurement and empirical research. National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G. (2005). Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 465–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., & Hitt, L. M. (2005). Losing sight of the forest for the trees: Productive capabilities and gains from trade as drivers of vertical scope. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1209–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G. (2005). The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, N., Kundu, S., & Niederman, F. (2008). Offshoring propensity in information technology services: A firm and country level analysis. Management International Review, 48(4), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hesterly, W., & Borgatti, S. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B., & Mukherjee, D. (2009). Understanding offshoring: A research framework based on disintegration, location and externalization advantages. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Murtha, T. (2009). Offshoring administrative and technical work: New fields for understanding the global enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Mol, M. J., & Ketkar, S. (2008). An evolutionary stage model of outsourcing and competence destruction: A triad comparison of the consumer electronics industry. Management International Review, 48(1), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis, A. (2003). Modern microeconomics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2007). Institutional factors affecting offshore business process and information technology outsourcing. Journal of International Management, 13(1), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Eickhoff, J. H. (2006). Outsourcing: When and how should it be done? Information Knowledge Systems Management, 5(4), 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (2003). The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 351–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2008). Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A., & Couto, V. (2007). Next generation offshoring—the globalization of innovation (1st ed.). Duke University, Durham: The Fuqua School of Business, and Booz Allen Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. K., & Miles, G. (2002). Predicting the use of external labor arrangements: A test of the transaction costs perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, C. (Ed.). (1997). Transaction cost economics: Recent developments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, L. F., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2008). Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SMEs’ access to global markets. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1984). Organizations: A quantum view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., & Whitaker, J. (2006). Effect of information and physical need on the disaggregation of services: Theory and empirical evidence. Working paper, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, S., & Tallman, S. (2010). Make, buy or ally? Theoretical perspectives on knowledge process outsourcing through alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1434–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Venzin, M. (2010). The strategic nexus of offshoring and outsourcing decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1510–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Kotabe, M. (1999). Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies: A modified transaction cost analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 791–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederman, F., Kundu, S., & Salas, S. (2006). IT software development offshoring: A multi-level theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(2), 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004). A fifth of jobs offshoreable. The OECD observer. November 4. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. (2007). International outsourcing of services: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of International Management, 13(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salaneik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (Ed.). (1994). Transaction costs, markets and hierarchies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, J. W. (2010). Plunkett’s outsourcing & offshoring industry Almanac 2011: Outsourcing and offshoring industry market research, statistics, trends & leading companies. Houston: Plunkett Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, S., Samii, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. W., & Greenwood, R. (1997). Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 346–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (2006). Outsourcing and offshoring: Implications for productivity of business services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (2004). Organizational choice in R&D alliances: Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(6–7), 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, A. (2002). Transcending transaction: The search for self-generating markets. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steensma, H. K., & Corley, K. G. (2001). Organizational context as a moderator of theories on firm boundaries for technology sourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuermer, K. (2009, August/September 3–4). Global outlook: Outsourcing—rapid restoration. Foreign Direct Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2009). Information economy report 2009: Trends and outlook in turbulent times. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, R. (2009). Outsourcing: Think more expansively. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1165–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vashistha, A., & Vashistha, A. (2006). The offshore nation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., & Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2000). Competition, capabilities and the make, buy or ally decisions of Chinese stateowned firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1996). Economic organization: The case for candor. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2008). The effects of innovation on vertical structure: Perspectives on transaction costs and competences. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 586–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngdahl, W., & Ramaswamy, K. (2008). Offshoring knowledge and service work: A conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngdahl, W., Ramaswamy, K., Verma, R., & Sahay, B. S. (2008). Offshoring of service and knowledge work. Journal of Operations Management, 26(Special Issue), (557–688).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Peter W. Liesch, Peter J. Buckley, Bernard L. Simonin, and Gary Knight

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liesch, P.W., Buckley, P.J., Simonin, B.L., Knight, G. (2014). Organizing the Modern Firm in the Worldwide Market for Market Transactions. In: The Multinational Enterprise and the Emergence of the Global Factory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402387_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics