Skip to main content

Conjoint-Based Approach to Location Choice in the Retail Industry: Conceptual Framework

  • Chapter
Innovative Management and Firm Performance

Abstract

Retailers need to think about shoppers, not just about format, as understanding the shoppers’ dynamics holds the key to such a business. Retailers should create new delivery formats that can cater to consumers. The choice of a store location has a profound effect on the entire business life of a retail operation. A bad choice may all but guarantee failure; a good choice success (Jain, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirani, S., & Baker, J. (1995). Quality cues and retail target market strategy: a conjoint-based application, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 23(5), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartness, A.D. (1994). The plant location puzzle, Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, E., & Heng, L. (2004). Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection, Building & Environment, 39, 1467–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y.R., & Shepherd, D.A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ decision to exploit opportunities, Journal of Management, 30(3), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current, J., Min, H., & Schilling, D. (1990). Multiobjective analysis of facility location decisions, European Journal of Operational Research, 49, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dariana, J.C., Wimana, A.R., & Tucci, L.A. (2005). Retail patronage intentions: the relative importance of perceived prices and salesperson service attributes, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaert, B., Borgers, A., Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (2003). Using conjoint choice experiments to model consumer choice of product component package, in A. Gustaffson, A. Hermann, F. Huber (eds). Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J.M., & Sanchez, M. (1997). Consumer preferences for wine attributes: a conjoint approach, British Food Journal, 99(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., & Rao, V. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data, Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing research: new developments and directions, Journal of Marketing, 54, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustaffson, A., Ekdahl, F., & Bergman, B. (1999). Conjoint analysis: a useful tool in the design process, Total Quality Management, 10(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. (2001). The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers: evaluating alternative model specifications, Transportation, 28, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. (2009). Factor influence location of retail store, Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/10971838/Factors-influence-the-location-of-Retail-Store-ANSHUL-JAIN.

  • Kim, C., Choe, S., Choi, C., & Park, Y. (2008). A systematic approach to new mobile service creation, Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 762–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M. (2006). Quantitative Methods in Marketing Management: Application of Conjoint Analysis. Serbian Operations Research Society, Belgrade. (In Serbian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., & Martić, M. (2012a). Using conjoint analysis to create superior value to customers, Metalurgia International, 17(2), 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., & Martić, M. (2012b). An approach to competitive product line design using conjoint data, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 7262–7269. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Andric Gušavac Bisera, M., & Martić, M. (2012a). Using conjoint analysis to identify key factors influencing customer value, TTEM — Technics Technologies Education Management, 4, 1698–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Panic, B., & Martić, M. (2011). Identification of key positioning factors in the retail sector: a conjoint analysis approach, African Journal of Business Management, 5(26), 10376–10386. doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Radosavljević, M., & Vujošević, M. (2013a). Understanding student preferences for postpaid mobile services using conjoint analysis, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 10(1), 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Savić, G., Gušavac Andric, B., Makajić-Nikolić, D., & Panic, B. (2013b). A Conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching performance, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4083–4089. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Savić, G., Popović, M., & Martić, M. (2013c). A new approach to evaluation of university teaching considering heterogeneity of students’ preferences, Higher Education, doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9596-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmanović, M., Vujošević, M., & Martić, M. (2012b). Using conjoint analysis to elicit patients’ preferences for public primary care service in Serbia. HealthMED, 6(2), 496–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.S. (1995). Modern marketing research techniques and the property professional, Property Management, 13, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.L., & Johnson, R.D. (1991). Using conjoint analysis to measure retail image in spatial analysis, in A. Gosh, C.A. Ingene (eds) Marketing: Theory, Methods and Applications. Research in Marketing, Supplement 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut, 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D., & Tukey, J.W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCarthy, B.L., & Atthirawong, W. (2003). Factors affecting location decisions in international operations — a Delphi study, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(7), 794–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majláth, M. (2009). Evaluation of environmentally friendly product attribute — results of an empirical research. Proceedings of the MEB 7th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking, Budapest, June 5–6, 2009, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankila, M. (2004). Retaining students in retail banking through price bundling: evidence from the Swedish Market. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(2), 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppewal, H. (1995). Conjoint experiments and retail planning: modelling consumer choice of shopping centre and retailer reactive behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning, Eidhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppewal, H., & Vriens, M. (2000). Measuring perceived service quality using integrated conjoint experiments, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(4), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orme, B. (1996). Which conjoint method should I use? Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popović, M., Kuzmanović, M., & Martić, M. (2012). Using conjoint analysis to elicit employers’ preferences toward key competencies for a business manager position. Management — Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 17(63), 17–26. doi: 10.7595/management.fon.2012.0011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radović, M., Tomašević, I., Stojanović, D. & Simeunović, B. (2009). An excellence role model: designing a new business system one process at a time, Industrial Engineer, 41(8), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radović, M., Ćamilović, S., Rakić, Z., Simeunović, B., Tomašević, I., & Stojanović, D. (2012). Process management as basis for quality management in service industry. TTEM — Technics Technologies Education Management, 7(2), 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D. (2005a). The differences in the choice of location in building manufacturing and service facilities. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Project Management, Zlatibor, June 13–15, 2005, 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D. (2005b). The application of network and the weighting method in site selection. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of Practitioners and Scientists, Belgrade, October 29–30, 2005, 174–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D. (2006). Classification and selection factors for site selection. Proceedings of the 4th Conference of Practitioners and Scientists, Belgrade, November 2–3, 2006, 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D. (2007). The impact of competition on the choice of location. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Project Management, Zlatibor, June 6–8, 2007, 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D., Tomašević, I., Simeunović, B., & Radović, M. (2012). Current state of business process management in Serbian industry. Metalurgia International, 17(10), 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović, D., & Andrić, B. (2008). Modeli izbora lokacije filijale banke. Proceedings of the 6th Conference of Practitioners and Scientists, Belgrade, November 6–7, 2008, 146–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noort, E.A., & Reijmer, I.J.T. (1999). Strategic Study Location Choice of SMEs — The Most Important Determinants, Small Business Research and Consultancy, Zoetermeer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, S. (2012). Choosing a retila store location — important location factor when opening store, Retrieved from http://retail.about.com/od/location/a/sele-cting_site_2.htm

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Bisera Andrić Gušavac, Dragana Stojanović, and Marija Kuzmanović

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gušavac, B.A., Stojanović, D., Kuzmanović, M. (2014). Conjoint-Based Approach to Location Choice in the Retail Industry: Conceptual Framework. In: Jakšić, M.L., Rakočević, S.B., Martić, M. (eds) Innovative Management and Firm Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402226_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics