Skip to main content

After the Big Bang — German Education Policy in the Wake of the PISA Study and the Bologna Process

  • Chapter
Internationalization of Education Policy

Part of the book series: Transformations of the State ((TRST))

Abstract

The expansion of the education poiicy universe to the international space affected Germany and its constellation of education policy politics, polity, and ideas substantially. Recent reforms in German education policy could not be assessed without referring to two international institutions that were particularly important for Germany: the Programme for International Student Assessment oPìSA) by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in secondare education and the Bologna Process in higher education. Both projects were set up on the international level and incorporated no binding commitments. However, the actual effects of the internationalization of education policy on Germany were neither foreseeable nor universally intended; both PISA and the Bologna Process successively generated severe repercussions for domestic education policy-making. Since encompassing education reforms in the late 1960s and early 1970s, education policy in Germany has been characterized by a backlog of reforms (for secondary education, see Baumert et al. 2003; Ertl 2006; for higher education, see Teichler 2005). Although some minor adjustments were enacted and agendas were set for further core reforms, no groundbreaking reforms were conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allmendinger, Jutta and Stephan Leibfried (2003) “Education and the Welfare State: The iour Worlds of Competence Production”, Journal of European Social Policy,. 13(11, 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, Jürgen, Kai S. Cortina and Adiim Leschinsky (2003) “Grundlegende Entwicklungen und Strukturprobleme im allgemein bildenden Schulwesen. Stmkturen und Entwicklungen im Überblick”, in Kai S. Cortina, Jürgen Baumert, Achim Leschinsky, Karl Ulrich Mayer and Luitgard Trommer, eds., Das Bildungswesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Struktureil und Entwicklungen im Überblick, Reinbek: Rowohlt, 52–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biossfeld, Hans-Peter, Wilfried ßos, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Bettina Hannover, Dieter Lenzen, Manfred Prenzel, Hans-Günther Koßbach, Rudolf Tippelt and Ludger Wößmann (2013) Qualitätssicherung an Hochschulen: von der Akkreditierung zur Auditierung. Münster: Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (2001) PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im inteinationalen Vergleich, Oplad.cn: Leske + Budräch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, Keiib and Peter John (2008) “The Three Exit, Three Voice and Loyally Framework: a Test with Survey Data on Local Services”, Political Studies, 56(2), 288–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erti, Hubert (2006) “Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: The Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany”, Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, Sotiria (2009) “Governing by Numbers: the PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe”, Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37’

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Michael (2006) “Die Exzeìlenzinitiative — ein Paradigm en Wechsel in der deutschen Hochschulpolitik”, Lex-iathan, 34(4), 447–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp., Gerd R (2011) Bildungspolitik in Deutschland. Eine Einfühlung, Wiesbaden: VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, Ruth and Michaela Koller (2010) “Hocbschulsteuemngim deutschen Bildungsföderalismus”, Swiss Political Science Review, 16(4), 649–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter (1987) Policy and Politics in West Germany. The Growth of a Semi-souvereign State, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, Eckhard, Cordula Artelt, Johannes Hartig, Nina Jude, Olaf Koller, Manfred Prenzel, Wolfgang Schneider and Petra Stanat (2010) PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt, Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, Eckhard, Hennann Avenarius, Werner Blum, Peter Döbrich, Hans Gruber, Manfred Prenzel, Kristina Reiss, Kurt Riquarts, Jürgen Rost, Heinz-Elmar Ten-orth and Helmut J. Vollmer (2003) Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards. Eine Expertise, Bonn: BMBE

    Google Scholar 

  • KMK (2011) The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany 2010/2011, Bonn: KMK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter (2004) “‘Political Context and Opportunity”, in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds.f The Blackwell Companion to Social Mo\’cments, Oxford: Blackwell, 67 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzeiidorf, Ute and Peer Pasternack (2008) “Laiidesiiocliscliulpolitiken”, in Achim HildebrandL and Frieder Wolf, eds., Die Politik der Bundesländer. Staat-Steifigkeit im Vergleich, Wiesbaden: VS., 43–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Kerstin and Dennis Niemann (2013) “When Do Numbers Count? The Differential Impact of Ratings and Rankings on National Education Policy in Germany and the US”, German Politics, 22(3), 314–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munch, Richard (2009) Globale Eliten, lokale Autoátäten. Bildung und. Wissenschaft unter dem Regime von PISA, McKinsey & Co., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Dennis (2010) “iürn of the Tide — New Horizons in German Education Policymaking through IO Influence’’, in Kerstin Martens, Alexander-Kenneth Nagel, Michael Windzio and Ansgar Weymann, eds., Transformation of Education Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmiìlan, 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, Dennis, Tönia Bieber and Kerstin Martens (201.3) “Contre toutes attentes — L’influence européenne sur les politiques d’enseignement supérieur en Allemagne et en Suisse”, Revue Éducation Comparée, 8, 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzei, Manfred (2007) “PISA 2006: Die wichtigsten Ergebnisse im Überblick”, in Manfred Prenzei, Cordula Artelt, Jürgen Baumert, Werner Blum, Marcus Hammami, Eckhard Klieme and Reinhard Pekran, eds., PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten inteiriationalcn Vcrgleichsstuäie, Münster: Waxmann, 13 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzei, Manfred, Cordula Artelt, Jürgen Baumert, Werner Blum, Marcus Tlarn-rnanri, Eckhardt Klieme and Reinhard Pekmn eds. (2007) Pisa 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen VergjeichsStudie, Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzei, Manfred, Jürgen Baumert, Werner Blum, Rainer Lehmann, Detlev Leutner, Michael Neubrand, Reinhard Pekrun, Jürgen Rost and Ulrich Schiefele eds. (2005) PISA 2003. Der zweite Vergleich der Länder in Deutschland — Was wissen und können Jugendliche?, Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzei, Manfred, Christiane Sälzer, Eckhard Klieme, Olaf Koller eds. (2013) PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland, Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rürup, Matthias (2007) Innovationswege im deutschen Bildungssystem. Die Verbreitung der Idee “Schulautonomie” im Ländervergleich, Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 11985) “DiePoliiikvertlechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich”, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 26(4), 323–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. (2007) “Nicht genutzte Chancen der Föderalismusreform”, in Christoph Egle and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, eds., Ende des rot-grünen Projektes. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 2002–2005, Wiesbaden: VS, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Christian and Volker Stein eds. (2009) Bologna-Schwarzbuch, Bonn: Deutscher Hochschulverband.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, Ulrich (2005) Hoch schul strukturen im Umbruch. Eine Bilanz der Reformdynamik seit vier Jahrzehnten, Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, Klaus-Jürgen, Kathrin Dederirig, Daniel Kneuper, Christian Kuhlmann and Isa Nessel (2008) PISA als bildungspolitisches Ereignis. Fallstudien in vier Bundesländern, Wiesbaden: VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toens, Katrin (2009) “The Bologna Process in German Educational Federalism. State Strategies, Policy Fragmentation and Interest Mediation”, German Politics, 18(2), 246–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Frieder (2008) “Die Schulpolitik-Kernbestand der Kulturbobéit”, in Achim Hildebraiidt and Frieder Wolf, eds., Die Politik der Bundesländer. Staatstätigkeit im Vergleich, Wiesbaden: VS, 21 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael (2005) “Globalizing Interests — an Introduction”, in Gregor Walter and Michael Zürn, eds., Globalizing Interests. Pressure Groups and Denationalization, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1—37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Dennis Niemann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niemann, D. (2014). After the Big Bang — German Education Policy in the Wake of the PISA Study and the Bologna Process. In: Martens, K., Knodel, P., Windzio, M. (eds) Internationalization of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401694_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics