Skip to main content

‘Canon can only get you so far’: Janeites Read and Write ‘The Bennet Brother’

  • Chapter
The Digital Afterlives of Jane Austen: Janeites at the Keyboard
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses a collaborative serial penned between January and September 2013 by published Austen spin off at the ‘Austen Authors’ website. This reading gives an account of the textual and intertextual implications of this endeavour’s location(s) within its digital provenance and print culture background. It comments further on the mimetic functions of this updated use of nineteenth-century serial forms of publishing, especially in relation to their specific writing demands and active reading practices. This incremental narrative, like the other Austen fan productions discussed throughout this study, reveals a synergy between urtext, spin off writing and adaptation. It similarly signifies an expansion of the boundaries of the canon, and the open-ended textual proliferation enacted by and enfolded into spin off and adaptation processes and products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, amongst many scholarly references, Gillian Dow and Clare Hanson, Introduction, in Gillian Dow and Clare Hanson (eds), Uses of Austen: Jane’s Afterlives (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. See Patrick Taylor, ‘Stourhead’ in Patrick Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Garden, Oxford: Oxford University, 2006, 453–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example, Jennifer Hayward, Consuming Pleasures: Active Audiences and Serial Fictions from Dickens to Soap Opera, Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angela Thomas, ‘Fan Fiction Online: Engagement, Critical Response and Affective Play through Writing’, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 29:3, 2006, 237

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jen Scott Curwood, Alecia Marie Magnifico and Jayne C. Lammers, ‘Writing in the Wild: Writers’ Motivation in Fan-Based Affinity Spaces’, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56:8, May 2013, 678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruth Page, ‘Seriality and Storytelling in Social Media’, Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 5, 2013, 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rachel M. Brownstein, Why Jane Austen?, New York: Columbia University Press, 2011, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katie Lanning, ‘Tessellating Texts: Reading the Moonstone in All the Year Round’, Victorian Periodicals Review 45:1, Spring 2012, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice, London: Penguin, 1996 [1813], 13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simone Murray, paraphrasing Julie Sanders, in Simone Murray, The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation, Hoboken: Routledge, 2012, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For theories of adaptation, the reader is directed to Linda Hutcheon, A Theory of Adaptation, Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Juliette Wells, Everybody’s Jane: Austen in the Popular Imagination, London: Continuum International Publishing, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, for example, Rachel M. Brownstein, Why Jane Austen?, 47, 50; Jun Xu, ‘Austen’s Fans and Fans’ Austen’, JLS 40, 2011, 85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberta Brandi, ‘Web Side Stories: Janeites, Fanfictions, and Never Ending Romances’, in Ingrid Hotz-Davies, Anton Kirchhofer and Sirpa Leppänen (eds), Internet Fictions, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009, 36

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deidre Shauna Lynch, ‘Sequels’, in Janet Todd (ed), Jane Austen in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 162

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roger Sales, Jane Austen and Representations of Regency England, Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013 [first 1994], 228.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suzanne Ferriss, ‘Narrative and Cinematic Doubleness: Pride and Prejudice and Bridget Jones’s Diary’, in Suzanne Ferriss and Mallory Young (eds), Chick Lit: The New Woman’s Fiction, New York: Routledge, 2006, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mia March, Finding Colin Firth: A Novel, New York: Gallery Books, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bronwen Thomas, ‘What Is Fanfiction and Why Are People Saying Such Nice Things about It?’, StoryWorlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 3, 2011, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jennifer Crusie, ‘Introduction’, in Jennifer Crusie (ed, with Glenn Yeffeth), Flirting with Pride & Prejudice: Fresh Perspectives on the Original Chick-Lit Masterpiece’, Dallas: BenBella, 2005, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Austen’s fascination with and use of the Wentworth family name is traced by Janine Barchas in Matters of Fact in Jane Austen: History, Location, and Celebrity, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laura Fairchild Brodie, ‘Jane Austen and the Common Reader: “Opinions of Mansfield Park,” “Opinions of Emma,” and the Janeite Phenomenon’, Texas Studies in Language & Literature 37, 1995, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matthew Rubery, ‘Bleak House in Real Time’, English Language Notes 46:1, 2008, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Julia McCord Chavez, ‘The Gothic Heart of Victorian Serial Fiction’, Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 50:4, 2010, 791–810.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jun Xu, ‘Austen’s Fans and Fans’ Austen, JLS: Journal of Literary Semantics 40, 2011, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scholars have developed theories about the importance of seriality in the production, transmission and reception of high quality television, such as ‘Mad Men’, ‘Breaking Bad’, ‘The Wire’ and ‘The Sopranos’ (another serial narrative referenced in the commentary section), and have tied this to nineteenth-century models. See, for example, Leigh Claire La Berge, ‘Capitalist Realism and Serial Form: The Fifth Season of The Wire’, Criticism 52:3-4, 2010, 547–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lauren M.E. Goodlad, ‘The Mad Men in the Attic: Seriality and Identity in the Modern Babylon’, in Lauren M.E. Goodlad, Lilya Kaganovsky and Robert A. Rushing (eds), Mad Men, Mad World: Sex, Politics, Style and the 1960s, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2013, 320–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Joy DeLyria and Sean Michael Robinson, Down in the Hole: The unWired World of H.B. Ogden New York: Powerhouse Books, 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Kylie Mirmohamadi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mirmohamadi, K. (2014). ‘Canon can only get you so far’: Janeites Read and Write ‘The Bennet Brother’. In: The Digital Afterlives of Jane Austen: Janeites at the Keyboard. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401335_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics