Advertisement

Remediating Religion as Everyday Practice: Postsecularism, Postcolonialism, and Digital Culture

  • Koen Leurs
  • Sandra Ponzanesi
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

This essay focuses on instances of religion in everyday online practices as expressed by migrant youth (i.e., Moroccan-Dutch youth in the Netherlands). We explore, in particular, how the engagement with digital practices, such as participation in social network sites like Hyves and Facebook and online discussion forums such as www.Marokko.nl, offer specific instances of the postsecular condition that deserve further scrutiny. The digital realm offers, in fact, medium-specific modalities for creating counter-publics — locations of appropriation and contestation of the dictums imposed by so-called secular society on migrant groups and their faiths and beliefs — but also an arena for alternative affective networks, through which religion is embedded and incorporated in everyday personal needs.

Keywords

Social Networking Site Public Sphere Everyday Practice Muslim Woman Message Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, K.A. (1997). ‘Is the “Post-“ in “Postcolonial” the “Post-“ in “Postmodern”?’ In A. McClintock, A. Mufti, and E. Shohat (eds) Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives, 420–444. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baban, F. and Keyman, F. (2008). ‘Turkey and Postnational Europe: Challenges for the Cosmopolitan Political Community.’ European Journal of Social Theory 11(1), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M.M. (1965). Trans. by H. Iswolsky, Rabelais and His World (1984). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. (1991). Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Beaumont, J. and Baker, C. (eds) (2011). Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory and Practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Boubekeur, A. (2005). ‘Cool and Competitive. Muslim Cultures in the West.’ ISIM Review 16, 12–13.Google Scholar
  9. Brouwer, L. (2006). ‘Giving Voice to Dutch Moroccan Girls on the Internet.’ Global Media Journal 5(9), Online source, available atlass.purduecal.edu/cca/gmj/fa06/gmj_fa06_brouwer.htm [last accessed 23 September 2014]
  10. Buitelaar, M. (2008). ‘De Islamisering van Identiteit onder Jongeren van Marokkaanse Afkomst [The Islamization of Identity among Youth of Moroccan Descent].’ In M. ter Borg (ed.) Handboek Religie in Nederland: Perspectief, Overzicht, Debat [Handbook Religion in the Netherlands: Perspective, Overview, Debate], 239–252. Zoetermeer, Belgium: Meinema.Google Scholar
  11. Byrne, D.N. (2008). ‘The Future of (the) “Race”: Identity, Discourse, and the Rise of Computer-mediated Public Spheres.’ In A. Everett (ed.) Learning Race and Ethnicity: Youth and Digital Media, 15–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, H. (2012). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. CBS. (2011). ‘Population: Sex, Age, Origin and Generation.’ Statistics Netherlands Statline. Online source, available at http://statline.cbs.nl/ [last accessed 16 December 2011].
  14. Couldry, N. (2003). Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Crul, M. and Heering, L. (eds) (2008). The Position of the Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  16. D’Haenens, L., Summeren, C. van, Saeys, F., and Koeman, J. (2004). Integratie of Identiteit? Mediamenu’s van Turkse en Marokkaanse Jongeren [Integration or Identity? Mediamenus of Turkish And Moroccan Youths]. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  17. Farris, S.R. and Jong, S. de (2013). ‘Discontinuous Intersections: Second-Generation Immigrant Girls in Transition from School to Work.’ Ethnic and Racial Studies. iFirst. Online source, available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01419870.2013.774033 [last accessed 10 April 2013].
  18. Fraser, N. (1990). ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.’ Social Text 25/26, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gajjala, R., Yartey, F.N., and Birzescu, A. (2013). ‘Producing the Global’. In R. Gajjala (ed.) Cyberculture and the Subaltern: Weavings of the Virtual and Real, 35–70. Plymouth: Lexington.Google Scholar
  20. Gazzah, M. (2009). ‘European Muslim Youth: Towards a Cool Islam?’ In J.S. Nielsen (ed.) Yearbook of Muslims in Europe, 403–425. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Højsgaard, M.T. and Warburg, M. (eds) (2005). Religion and Cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hoover, S.M. (1988). Mass Media Religion: The Social Sources of the Electronic Church. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hoover, S.M. (2006). Religion in the Media Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Huggan, G. (2010). ‘Is the “Post-“ in “Postsecular” the “Post-“ in “Postcolonial”?’ Modern Fiction Studies 56(4), 751–768.Google Scholar
  25. Jong, J. de (2007). Kapot Moeilijk. Een Etnografisch Onderzoek naar Opvallend Delinquent Groepsgedrag van ‘Marokkaanse’ Jongens. [An Ethnographic Exploration of Delinquent Group behavior of ‘Moroccan’ Boys]. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
  26. Karatzogianni, A. and Kuntsman, A. (eds) (2012). Digital Cultures and the Politics of Emotion: Feelings, Affect and Technological Change. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Karlsson, L. (2007). ‘Desperately Seeking Sameness. The Processes and Pleasures of Identification in Women’s Diary Blog Reading.’ Feminist Media Studies 7(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koning, M. de. (2005). ‘Dit Is Geen Poep Wat Ik Praat. De Hirsi Ali Diss Nader Belicht [This Is No Bullshit. Assessing the Hirsi Ali Diss]’. ZemZem 1(1), 36–41.Google Scholar
  29. Landow, G.P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0. Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Leurs, K. (2012). Digital Passages. Moroccan-Dutch Youths Performing Diaspora, Gender and Youth Cultural Identities across Digital Space. PhD, Utrecht University. Available at http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/ [last accessed 9 April 2013].Google Scholar
  31. Leurs, K., Midden, M., and Ponzanesi, S. (2012). ‘Digital Multiculturalism in the Netherlands. Religious, Ethnic and Gender Positioning by Moroccan-Dutch Youth.’ Religion and Gender 2(1), 150–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynch, G. (2010). ‘Religion, Media and Cultures of Everyday Life.’ In J.R. Hinnells (ed.) The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, 2nd ed., 543. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Mamadouh, V. (2001). ‘Constructing a Dutch Moroccan Identity through the World Wide Web.’ Arab World Geographer 4(4), 258–274.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, B. (ed.) (2011). Aesthetic Formations: Media, Religion, and the Senses. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Mitchell, J. and Marriage, S. (eds) (2003). Mediating Religion: Conversations in Media, Religion and Culture. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, D. (ed.) (2008). Keywords in Media, Religion, and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Mufti, A. (1998). ‘Auerbach In Istanbul: Edward Said, Secular Criticism, and the Question of Minority Culture.’ Critical Enquiry 25, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakamura, L. and Chow-White, P. (eds) (2012). Race after the Internet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nayar, P. (ed.) (2010). The New Media and Cybercultures Anthology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Newman, N. (2009). ‘That’s All Concept; It’s Nothing Real.’ In S. Alim, A. Ibrahim and A. Pennycook (eds) Global Linguistic Flows. Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language, 195–212. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nunley, V. (2004). ‘From the Harbor to Da Academic Hood: Hush Harbors and an African American Rhetorical Tradition.’ In E. Richardson and R. Jackson (eds) African American Rhetoric(s): Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 221–241. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nynäs, P., Lassander, M. and Utriainen, T. (eds) (2012). Postsecular Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Pels, T. and Haan, M.J. de (2003). Continuity and Change in Moroccan Socialization. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut/Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  44. Piela, A. (2012). Muslim Women Online. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Robbins, B. (2012). Perpetual War. Cosmopolitanism from the Viewpoint of Violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Said, E. (1983). The World, the Text and the Critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Salvatore, A. (2004). ‘Making Public Space: Opportunities and Limits of Collective Action among Muslims in Europe.’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30(5), 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stekelenburg, J., Oegema, D., and Klandermans, B. (2011). ‘No Radicalization without Identification: How Ethnic Dutch and Dutch Muslim Web Forums Radicalize over Time.’ In A.E. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, and B. Simon (eds) Identity and Participation in Culturally Diverse Societies, 256–274. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Stolow, J. (2010). ‘Religion, Media, and Globalization.’ In B.S. Turner (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion, 544–562. Chichester: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vis, F., Zoonen, L. van, and Mihelj, S. (2011). ‘Women Responding to the AntiIslam film Fitna : Voices and Acts of Citizenship on YouTube.’ Feminist Review 97, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Koen Leurs and Sandra Ponzanesi 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koen Leurs
  • Sandra Ponzanesi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations