Advertisement

The Unprecedented Return of Saint Paul in Contemporary Philosophy

  • Gregg Lambert
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

The conceptual relationship between crisis (krisis) and critique (krinein) in post-Kantian philosophy, pronounced most forcefully by Husserl in the opening lectures of The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, is well known to most readers of contemporary philosophy. ‘The difficulty that has plagued human psychology’, Husserl writes, ‘[and] not just in our time but for centuries — its own peculiar ‘crisis’ —… leads [us] back to the enigma of subjectivity itself and thus is inseparably bound to the enigma of psychological subject matter and method ’ (Husserl, 1970). The question I will turn to in this discussion is whether the contemporary crisis announced under the term of the ‘post-secular’, referring in this sense to the decline of scientific method and the return of something akin to a ‘faith position’ expressed by certain contemporary philosophies, is remarkably different than the earlier crisis between the humanistic disciplines — including modern philosophy (Geisteswissenschaften) — and the positivistic sciences announced by Husserl in 1936 and, even earlier, the crisis between faith and reason during the period of the Enlightenment? In taking up this question — What’s this postsecular crisis all about? — I will turn to examine the writings of the contemporary French philosopher Alain Badiou around the somewhat emblematic figure of Saint Paul.

Keywords

Pure Element Subjective Form Contemporary Philosophy Transcendental Phenomenology Humanistic Discipline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badiou, A. (1993). Trans. by P. Hallward. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2003). Trans. by R. Brassier. Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Heidegger, M. (1998). ‘Phenomenology and Theology.’ In W. McNeill (ed.) Pathmarks 41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, E. (1970). Trans. by D. Carr. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Levinas, E. (1978). Trans. by Alphonos Lingis. Existence and Existents. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levinas, E. (1972). Humanisme de l’autre homme. Paris: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar
  7. Meeks, W.A. (1983). The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gregg Lambert 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregg Lambert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations