Advertisement

Towards a More Inclusive Feminism: Defining Feminism through Faith

  • Eva Midden
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

In 1991, the conservative liberal politician Frits Bolkestein published the article ‘ Integratie van minderheden moet met lef worden aangepakt ’ (‘Integretation of minorities should be handled with guts’), which is generally considered to be the start of a long range of debates about minorities in the Netherlands. Even though many already believed that more attention should be given to the integration of migrants, the words of Bolkestein shocked the country (Prins, 2002). His main thesis is that multiculturalism should be limited; Western principles like freedom and equality are to be protected by all means (Bolkestein, 1991). Furthermore, he argues that more attention should be paid to the integration of minorities: because it is such a difficult problem, we have to deal with it with courage and creativity. There is no room for taboos or taking the easy way out (Bolkestein, 1991: 188).

Keywords

Focus Group Religious Tradition Muslim Woman Refugee Woman Feminist Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, A.H. (2004a). ‘De Maagdenkooi.’ In De Maagdenkooi, 7–25. Amsterdam: Augustus.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, A.H. (2004b). ‘Hoezo, Uiting Van Trots?’ In De Maagdenkooi, 36–39. Amsterdam: Augustus.Google Scholar
  3. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barlas (2005). ‘Globalizing Equality: Muslim Women, Theology, and Feminisms’. In F. Nouraie-Simone (ed.) On Shifting Ground: Muslim Women in the Global Era. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blaagaard, B. (2007). ‘Gender or Discrimination: Rethinking the Cartoon Controversy.’ Historica 2(30), 15–19.Google Scholar
  6. Bolkestein, F. (1991). ‘De integratie van minderheden moet met lef worden aangepakt.’ Volkskrant. 12 September. Reprinted in F. Bolkestein (1992) ‘Integratie van minderheden.’ Woorden hebben hun betekenis, 181–188 Amsterdam: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  7. Bracke, S. (2008). ‘Conjugating the Modern/Religious, Conceptualizing Female Religious Agency: Contours of a “Postsecular” Conjuncture.’ Theory, Culture, & Society 25(6), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracke, S. and Schmitt, M. (2006). ‘The Postsecular and the Battle over Transcendence.’ Paper presented at ‘Restating Religion: A Conference Reconsidering the Rules’, Columbia University, 23–24 March 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2008). ‘In Spite of the Times: The Postsecular Turn in Feminism.’ Theory, Culture, & Society 25(6), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buruma, I. (2006). Murder in Amsterdam: The Death of Theo van Gogh and the Limits of Tolerance. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, M. (2002). ‘Multiple Critique: Islamic Feminist Rhetorical Strategies’. In L.E. Donaldson and K. Pui-lan (eds) Postcolonialism, Feminism and Religious Discourse. London/New York: Routledge, 142–161.Google Scholar
  12. Dresselhuys, C. (2001) Cited in X. van Gelder Miriam Schöttelndreier ‘Het feminisme bloeit waanzinnig, in Overijssel.’ De Volkskrant. 8 March.Google Scholar
  13. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Ghorashi, H. (2003). ‘Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Daring or Dogmatic? Debates on Multiculturalism and Emancipation in the Netherlands.’ Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 42, 163–173.Google Scholar
  15. Harding, S. (2004). ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistomology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’?’ In S. Harding (ed.) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. Intellectual and Political Controversies, 127–141. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Henry, A. (2004). Not My Mother’s Sister: Generational Conflict and Third-Wave Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Leavy, P.L. (2007). ‘The Practice of Feminist Oral History and Focus Groups Interviews.’ In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber, and P. Leavy (eds) Feminist Research Practice: A Primer, 149–187. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety. The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Okin, Moller S. (1999a). Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Edited by J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M.C. Nussbaum. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Prins, B. (2002). ‘Het lef om taboes te doorbreken. Nieuw realisme in het Nederlandse discours over multiculturalisme.’ Migrantenstudies 18(4), 241–254.Google Scholar
  21. Prins, B. (2004). Voorbij de Onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennip.Google Scholar
  22. Redfern, C. and Aune, K. (2010). Reclaiming the F Word: The New Feminist Movement. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. Scott, J.W. (2005). ‘Symptomatic Politics: The Banning of Islamic Head Scarves in French Public Schools.’ French, Politics, Culture & Society, 23(3), 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tuin, I. van der. (2009). ‘Jumping Generations: On Second- and Third-Wave Feminist Epistemology.’ Australian Feminist Studies 24(59), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilkinson, S. (2004). ‘Focus Groups: A Feminist Method.’ In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber and M. Yaiser (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, 271–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eva Midden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Midden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations