Advertisement

Social Relations and the Use of Symbolic Resources in Learning and Development

  • Tania Zittoun
Chapter

Abstract

Social relations unfold between people, in specific societies. Doing so, they participate both in the making of people and societies, and, in times of tension and war, in the unmaking of groups or the harming of individuals. Yet social relations are never immediate, or naked. In a world of culture, they appear as always mediated. In effect, people’srelationships are made through exchanges of words and objects, are filtered by beliefs and expectations, and are facilitated by phones and books. Yet, interestingly, these mediations — be they material tools or more se miotic mediation — mostly have a double mode of existence. Not only do they actually mediate a social relation between two people — as when a flag is passed from one hand to another — but also they are mostly likely to mediate, or trigger, or facilitate a more symbolic dynamic, as when a flag is used by one person to remind them of their childhood home, or for the other to think about possible conquests for their group. In other words, a cultural psychology invites us to examine the cultural elements which mediate human relationships. These, which usually have a material and a semiotic dimension, have both an existence in the present — the here and now of an interaction — and also a more virtual one, opening memories or worlds of possibilities.

Keywords

Social Relation Mutual Recognition Symbolic Dynamic Asian Culture Shared Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA/ London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Daiute, C. (2010). Human development and political violence. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daiute, C. (2013). Living history by youth in post-war situations. In K. Hanson & O. Nieuwenhuys (Eds.), Reconceptualizing children’srights in international development living rights, social justice, translations (pp. 175–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie, A. (1999). The battle of the symbols: Constructing peace for Northern Ireland in three public spheres (MSc dissertation). London: Institute of Social Psycholog)’’, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Gillespie, A. (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Gillespie, A. (2007). The social basis of self-reflection. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 678–691). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossen, M., Zittoun, T. & Ros, J. (2012). Boundary crossing events and potential appropriation space in philosophy, literature and general knowledge. In E. Hjörne, G. van der Aalsvoort & G. de Abreu (Eds.), Learning, social interaction and diversity — exploring school practices (pp. 15–33). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford/Maiden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Husnu, S. & Crisp, R.J. (2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Makriyianni, C. & Psaltis, C. (2007). The teaching of history and reconciliation. The Cyprus Review, 19(1), 43–69.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, P. J., Hoogstra, L., Mintz, J., Fung, H. & Williams, K. (1993). Troubles in the garden and how they get resolved: A young child’stransformation of his favorite story. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), Memory and affect in development (Vol. 26, pp. 87–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Newman, D. (1999). Real spaces, symbolic spaces: Interrelated notions of territory in the Arab-Israeli conflict. In P. R Diehl (Ed.), A road map to war: Territorial dimensions of international conflict (pp. 3–34). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2004). The thinking spaces of the young. In A.-N.Google Scholar
  15. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun & B. Bürge (Eds.), Joining society: Social interactions and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 3–10). New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Reid, B. (2008). Trellising the girders: poetry and the imagining of place in Northern Ireland. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (5), 519–533.Google Scholar
  17. Tajfel, H. (1981). Humans groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT press.Google Scholar
  20. Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions. Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Zittoun, T. (2007). Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions. Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 15(2), 193–211.Google Scholar
  22. Zittoun, T. (2010). How does an object become symbolic? Rooting semiotic artefacts in dynamic shared experiences. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformations. The mind in movement through culture and society (pp. 173–192). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Zittoun, T. (2011). Social relations and the use of symbolic resources in learning and development. Cahiers de psychologie et éducation, 47, 19–26.Google Scholar
  24. Zittoun, T. (2013). On the use of a film: Cultural experiences as symbolic resources. In A. Kuhn (Ed.), Little madnesses: Winnicott, transitional phenomena and cultural experience (pp. 135–147). London: Tauris.Google Scholar
  25. Zittoun, T. (2014). Trusting for learning. In P. Linell & I. Markovâ (Eds.), Trust and language (pp. 125–151). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Zittoun, T. & Grossen, M. (2012). Cultural elements as means of constructing the continuity of the self across various spheres of experience. In M. César & B. Ligorio (Eds.), The interplays between dialogical learning and dialogical self (pp. 99–126). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M. & Ferring, D. (2013). Human development in the lifecourse. Melodies of living. Cambridge: Cambridge LIniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tania Zittoun 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Zittoun

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations