Skip to main content

Abstract

In the literature of international relations, the term “conflict transformation”has emerged over the last couple of decades in parallel with the more established term “conflict resolution”. The two are not antithetical and the notion of transformation is often presented as a stepping-stone to resolution, especially in the case of protracted conflicts, and even as a path to peace transformation (Galtung, 2000). Transformation implies that conflict continues to occur but takes a radically different form than before, entering a more constructive mode. For example, it can move from violent to post-violent conflict, or from cold peace to transitional peace settlement and a new constitutional state of affairs, where conflict may still persist in the broad sense of the incompatibility of positions between subjects, yet where conflict relationships, interests and discourses maybe transformed (Miall, 2001, p. 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akhtar, S. W. (1997). The Islamic concept of knowledge. Al-Tawhid: A Quarterly journal of Islamic Thought and Culture, 2(3). Retrieved 8 September 2005, from http://www.al-islarn.org/al-tawhid/islarn-know-conc.htm.

  • Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul: The foundation of universalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. and Johnson, J. (Eds.) (1977). Unofficial diplomats. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. (1954). Christianity, diplomacy and war. New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, R (1975). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. London: Wildwood House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, R (2002). Hidden connections: Integrating the biological, cognitive and social dimensions of life into a science of sustainability. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero. (1913). De Officiis (W. Miller, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, C. M. (1996). On the way to diplomacy. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, C. M. (2004). States of political discourse: Words, regimes, seditions. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, E. (Director) (2003). Pyla: Living together separately (documentary film). Greece/Cyprus: Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Denan, J. (1987). On diplomacy: A genealogy of Western estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell. Evangelii Nuntianti. (1975). Retrieved 10 March 2004, from www.papalencyclicals.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. K. (1985). Another look at the function of Wampum in Iroquois-White Councils. In R Jennings (Ed.), The history and culture of Iroquois diplomacy (pp. 99–114). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (2000). Conflict transformation by peaceful means: The transcend method. New York: United Nations manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. (Ed.) (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. USA: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratne, S. A. (2005). Public diplomacy, global communication and world order: An analysis based on theory of living systems. Current Sociology, 53, 749–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, I. (2002). History, Christianity and diplomacy: Sir Herbert Butterfield and international relations. Review of International Studies, 28, 719–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igbal, A. (1975). The prophet’sdiplomacy: The art of negotiation as conceived and developed by the prophet of Islam. Cape Cod, MA: Claude Stark & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabri, V. (1996). Discourses on violence: Conflict analysis reconsidered. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. (Ed.) (2003). Faith-based diplomacy: Trumping realpolitik. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. and Sampson, C. (Eds.) (1994). Religion: The missing dimension of statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. P. (1999). Kinship diplomacy in the ancient world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1967). Alchemical studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1997). Jung on active imagination: Key readings. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keens-Soper, M. (1975). The liberal disposition of diplomacy. International Relations, 5, 907–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1991). Strangers to ourselves. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, H. (2001). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neophytos, Bishop of Morphou. (2 September 2004). Our prayer is not against the work of politicians. Politis, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. B. (2005). To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 72–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numelin, R. (1950). The beginnings of diplomacy: A sociological study of intertribal and international relations. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope Paul VI. (1976). An apologia for papal diplomacy (1970 speech to the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the holy see). In H. E. Cardinale (Ed.), The holy see and the international order (pp. xvii-xx). Gerrards Cross, UK: Colin Smythe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2002). Maintaining order, making peace. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (2008). Peace in international relations. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R (1992). The classical heritage in Islam. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca (1932a). De Otio (J. W. Basore, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca (1932b). De Tranquillitate Animi (J. W. Basore, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (2001). Minnesota, as international actors. International Studies Perspectives, 2, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (2003). Herbert Butterfield, the English school and the civilizing virtues of diplomacy. International Affairs, 79, 855–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidy, R. V. (1992). World diplomacy. Sedona, AZ: SNS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, S. (1997). The diplomat as a stranger. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 8, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St einer, R. (1972). Christianity as mystical fact. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkan, V. D. (1999a). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part I. individual and large-group identity. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkan, V. D. (1999b). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part II. large-group rituals. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkan, V D. (1999c). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part III. potentials for and obstacles against collaboration. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, D. J. (2004). Sustainable diplomacy: Ecology, religion and ethics in Muslim-Christian relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Costas M. Constantinou

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Constantinou, C.M. (2015). Conflict Transformation and Homodiplomacy. In: Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., Perret-Clermont, AN. (eds) Social Relations in Human and Societal Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400994_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics