Advertisement

Conflict Transformation and Homodiplomacy

  • Costas M. Constantinou
Chapter

Abstract

In the literature of international relations, the term “conflict transformation”has emerged over the last couple of decades in parallel with the more established term “conflict resolution”. The two are not antithetical and the notion of transformation is often presented as a stepping-stone to resolution, especially in the case of protracted conflicts, and even as a path to peace transformation (Galtung, 2000). Transformation implies that conflict continues to occur but takes a radically different form than before, entering a more constructive mode. For example, it can move from violent to post-violent conflict, or from cold peace to transitional peace settlement and a new constitutional state of affairs, where conflict may still persist in the broad sense of the incompatibility of positions between subjects, yet where conflict relationships, interests and discourses maybe transformed (Miall, 2001, p. 4).

Keywords

International Relation Public Diplomacy Political Marketing Power Domination Conflict Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akhtar, S. W. (1997). The Islamic concept of knowledge. Al-Tawhid: A Quarterly journal of Islamic Thought and Culture, 2(3). Retrieved 8 September 2005, from http://www.al-islarn.org/al-tawhid/islarn-know-conc.htm.
  2. Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul: The foundation of universalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berman, M. and Johnson, J. (Eds.) (1977). Unofficial diplomats. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butterfield, H. (1954). Christianity, diplomacy and war. New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press.Google Scholar
  5. Capra, R (1975). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
  6. Capra, R (2002). Hidden connections: Integrating the biological, cognitive and social dimensions of life into a science of sustainability. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  7. Cicero. (1913). De Officiis (W. Miller, Trans.). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Constantinou, C. M. (1996). On the way to diplomacy. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Constantinou, C. M. (2004). States of political discourse: Words, regimes, seditions. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demetriou, E. (Director) (2003). Pyla: Living together separately (documentary film). Greece/Cyprus: Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Der Denan, J. (1987). On diplomacy: A genealogy of Western estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell. Evangelii Nuntianti. (1975). Retrieved 10 March 2004, from www.papalencyclicals.net.Google Scholar
  12. Foster, M. K. (1985). Another look at the function of Wampum in Iroquois-White Councils. In R Jennings (Ed.), The history and culture of Iroquois diplomacy (pp. 99–114). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Galtung, J. (2000). Conflict transformation by peaceful means: The transcend method. New York: United Nations manual.Google Scholar
  14. Gillespie, A. (Ed.) (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. USA: IAP.Google Scholar
  15. Gunaratne, S. A. (2005). Public diplomacy, global communication and world order: An analysis based on theory of living systems. Current Sociology, 53, 749–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, I. (2002). History, Christianity and diplomacy: Sir Herbert Butterfield and international relations. Review of International Studies, 28, 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Igbal, A. (1975). The prophet’sdiplomacy: The art of negotiation as conceived and developed by the prophet of Islam. Cape Cod, MA: Claude Stark & Co.Google Scholar
  18. Jabri, V. (1996). Discourses on violence: Conflict analysis reconsidered. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, D. (Ed.) (2003). Faith-based diplomacy: Trumping realpolitik. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnston, D. and Sampson, C. (Eds.) (1994). Religion: The missing dimension of statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, C. P. (1999). Kinship diplomacy in the ancient world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jung, C. G. (1967). Alchemical studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jung, C. G. (1997). Jung on active imagination: Key readings. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keens-Soper, M. (1975). The liberal disposition of diplomacy. International Relations, 5, 907–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kristeva, J. (1991). Strangers to ourselves. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miall, H. (2001). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  29. Neophytos, Bishop of Morphou. (2 September 2004). Our prayer is not against the work of politicians. Politis, p. 9.Google Scholar
  30. Neumann, I. B. (2005). To be a diplomat. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Numelin, R. (1950). The beginnings of diplomacy: A sociological study of intertribal and international relations. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  32. Pope Paul VI. (1976). An apologia for papal diplomacy (1970 speech to the members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the holy see). In H. E. Cardinale (Ed.), The holy see and the international order (pp. xvii-xx). Gerrards Cross, UK: Colin Smythe.Google Scholar
  33. Richmond, O. (2002). Maintaining order, making peace. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  34. Richmond, O. (2008). Peace in international relations. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenthal, R (1992). The classical heritage in Islam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Seneca (1932a). De Otio (J. W. Basore, Trans.). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  37. Seneca (1932b). De Tranquillitate Animi (J. W. Basore, Trans.). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Sharp, P. (2001). Minnesota, as international actors. International Studies Perspectives, 2, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharp, P. (2003). Herbert Butterfield, the English school and the civilizing virtues of diplomacy. International Affairs, 79, 855–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sidy, R. V. (1992). World diplomacy. Sedona, AZ: SNS Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sofer, S. (1997). The diplomat as a stranger. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 8, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. St einer, R. (1972). Christianity as mystical fact. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.Google Scholar
  43. Volkan, V. D. (1999a). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part I. individual and large-group identity. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Volkan, V. D. (1999b). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part II. large-group rituals. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volkan, V D. (1999c). Psychoanalysis and diplomacy: Part III. potentials for and obstacles against collaboration. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wellman, D. J. (2004). Sustainable diplomacy: Ecology, religion and ethics in Muslim-Christian relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Costas M. Constantinou 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Costas M. Constantinou

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations