Advertisement

Social Relations, the Financial Crisis and Human Development

  • Stefano Passini
Chapter

Abstract

Early in 2014, via a referendum proposed by a national conservative and right-wing political party and mobilized by far-right movements, Switzerland approved a motion to impose a quota on immigration with a view to curtailing the phenomenon. The motion runs counter to the principle of the free movement of workers between the EU and Switzerland. While a statement issued by the European Commission declared that it was “disappointed”about this result in favour of immigration curbs, the Swiss outcome was acclaimed by the growing extremist wings of European politics. These Eurosceptic and anti-immigration parties and movements have frequently linked the increasing immigration in the EU with the recent economic and financial crises of the host countries. The recent expansion of the EU has indeed entailed an exponential increment in immigration towards Western European countries, in particular from the new Eastern European member states. This expansion of multiculturalism has coincided with a major crisis affecting the European economic system that has especially affected the Mediterranean countries (namely, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal). The coincidental overlapping of these two events has led people to mistakenly attribute the crisis to immigration. Hericourt and Spielvogel (2012, p. 2) have noted that “the crisis threatens to revive opposition to immigration and foster anti-immigrant feelings”. The consequence is a strengthening of the polarization of “us”vs.

Keywords

Financial Crisis Relative Deprivation Social Dominance Orientation Political Trust Intergroup Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleksynska, M. (2011). Relative deprivation, relative satisfaction, and attitudes towards immigrants: Evidence from Ukraine. Economic Systems, 35, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, J. C., Wagner, U. & Christ, O. (2011). Consequences of the 2008 financial crisis for intergroup relations: The role of perceived threat and causal attributions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 871–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bélanger, E. & Aarts, K. (2006). Explaining the rise of the LPF: Issues, discontent and the 2002 Dutch election. Acta Politica, 41, 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bélanger, E. & Nadeau, R. (2005). Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections: The Canadian case. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benasayag, M. & Schmit, G. (2003). Les passions tristes: Souffrance psychique et crise sociale [The sad passions: Mental suffering and social crisis]. Cahiers libres. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
  10. Bertman, S. (1998). Hypercuîture: The human cost of speed. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Bergh, J. (2004). Denmark, and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27, 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buffardi, L. E. & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1303–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Butz, D. A. & Yogeeswaran, K. (2011). Another threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, W. K. & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, T. & Gronke, P. (2005). The sceptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coull, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y, Castano, E., Paladino, M.-P. & Leemans, V. (2001). Protecting the ingroup: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices. The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Groot, J. & Steg, L. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1930). Individualism, old and new. New York: Minton.Google Scholar
  21. Dittmar, H. (2007). The costs of consumer culture and the “cage within”: The impact of the material “good life”and “body perfect”ideals on individuals” identity and well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duriez, B. & Van, H. A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrenberg, A. (2010). La socieitei du malaise [The society of malaise]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  24. Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 239–264). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ellemers, N. & Baneto, M. (2009). Collective action in modem times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erickson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Etzioni, A. (1991). The community in an age of individualism: An interview with Amitai Etzioni. The Futurist, May-June, 35–39.Google Scholar
  28. Fesnic, R N. & Viman-Miller, R. (2009). What drives the vote for the extreme right? Absolute vs. relative deprivation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  29. Fink el, N. J. & Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Galliker, M., Herman, J., Imminger, K. & Weimer, D. (1998). The investigation of contiguity. Co-occunence analysis of print media using CD-ROMs as a new data source, illustrated by a discussion on migrant delinquency in a daily newspaper. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibson, S. (2011). Dilemmas of citizenship: Young people’sconceptions of un/employment rights and responsibilities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 450–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grant, P. R. (2008). The protest intentions of skilled immigrants with credential-ing problems: A test of a model integrating relative deprivation theory with social identity theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 687–705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hayward, K. & Hobbs, D. (2007). Beyond the binge in ‘booze Britain’: market-led liminalization and the spectacle of binge drinking. The British Journal of Sociology, 58, 437–456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hericourt, J. & Spielvogel, G. (2012). How beliefs about the impact of immigration shape policy preferences: Evidence from Europe. Paris: Dauphine.Google Scholar
  36. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of trust. The American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hetherington, M. J. & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. & Wang, S. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang, J.-J., Huang, M.-Y. & Syu, F.-K. (2010). Liberated anomie in generation next: Hyperindividualism, extreme consumerism, and social isolationism. Fooyin Journal of Health Sciences, 2(2), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ivarsflaten, E (2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joireman, J., Strathman, A. & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering future consequences: An integrative model. In L. J. Sanna & E. C. Chang (Eds.), Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behavior (pp. 82–99). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kairys, A. (2010). Correlations between time perspective and personality traits in different age groups, Tiltai, 2, 159–172.Google Scholar
  44. Kelman, H. C. & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kilboume, J. (2006). Jesus is a brand of jeans: How advertising affects the way we think and feel. New Internationalist, 393, 10–12.Google Scholar
  46. Rnafo, A., Sagiv, L. & Roccas, S. (2011). The value of values in cross-cultural research: A special issue in honor of Shalom Schwartz. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kunovich, R. M. (2000). “The morning after”: Political participation during systemic transformation. In K. M. Slomczyriski (Ed.), Social patterns of being political: The initial phase of the post-communist transition in Poland (pp. 129–142). Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Lai on de, R. N. & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lang, F. R. & Carstensen, L. L. (1994). Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain. Psychology and Aging, 9, 315–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Levi, M. & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lipovetsky, G. (2006). Le bonheur paradoxal: Essai sur la société d’hyperconsommation [Paradoxical happiness: Essay on hyperconsumption society]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  52. Lowen, A. (1983). Narcissism: Denial of the true self. New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  53. Lury, C. (1996). Consumer culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  54. Macpherson, C. B. (1964). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, A. H. & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 357–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morselli, D. (2013). The olive tree effect: Future time perspective when the future is uncertain. Culture & Psychology, 19, 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morselli, D. & Passini, S. (2011). New perspectives on the study of the authority relationship: Integrating individual and societal level research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psychoanalysis, its image and its public]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  60. Niemi, R. G. & Weisberg, H. F. (2001). Controversies in voting behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  61. Newton, K. & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture, or performance? In S. J. Phan & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies. What’stroubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Oesterreich, D. (2005). Flight into security: A new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology, 26, 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Passini, S. (2011). Moral reasoning in a multicultural society: Moral inclusion and moral exclusion. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Passini, S. (2011). Individual responsibilities and moral inclusion in an age of rights. Culture & Psychology, 17, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Passini, S. (2013). A binge-consuming culture: The effect of consumerism on social interactions in western societies. Culture & Psychology, 19, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Passini, S. (2014). Subtle prejudice and conformism: The complicity of indifference. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  67. Passini, S. & Morselli, D. (2009). Authority relationships between obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Passini, S. & Morselli, D. (2010a). Disobeying an illegitimate request in a democratic or authoritarian system. Political Psychology, 31, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Passini, S. & Morselli, D. (2010b). Avoiding crimes of obedience: A comparative study of the autobiographies of MK Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Peace Sc Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Passini, S. & Morselli, D. (2011). In the name of democracy: Disobedience and value-oriented citizenship, Journal of Community Sc Applied Social Psychology, 21, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Passini, S. & Morselli, D. (2013). The triadic legitimacy model: Understanding support to disobedient groups. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pattyn, S., Van, H. A., Dhont, K. & Onraet, E. (2012). Stripping the political cynic: A psychological exploration of the concept of political cynicism. European Journal of Personality, 26, 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pettigrew, T. R & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pettigrew, T. R, Christ, O., Wagner, U., Meertens, R. W., van Dick, R. & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and inter group prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Polavieja, J. (2013). Economic Crisis, Political Legitimacy, and Social Cohesion. In D. Gallie (Ed.), Economic crisis, quality of work, and social integration: The European experience (pp. 256–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  78. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  79. Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. W. (1966). Groups in harmony and tension. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
  80. Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W. & Laçante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization: Capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, H. J., Cronin, T. & Kessler, T. (2008). Anger, fear or sadness: Faculty members’ emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology, 29, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M. & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Tan, S. J. & Tambyah, S. K. (2011). Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 103, 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Volpato, C., Durante, R, Gabbiadini, A., Andrighetto, L. &Mari, S. (2010). Picturing the others: Targets of delegitimization across time. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 269–287.Google Scholar
  86. Walker, I. & Smith, H. (2001). Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Werts, H., Scheepers, P. & Lubbers, M. (2013). Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics, 14, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Stefano Passini 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Passini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations