Skip to main content

Beyond Impressionist Subjectivity

  • Chapter
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

While Mansfield’s youthful vignettes are marked by a recurring Impressionist technique — the presence of an observer behind a window — this chapter argues that Mansfield needed to do away with this intrusively ego-centric gaze to develop a transparent medium. It was cinema that taught Mansfield to develop new techniques, as evident already in ‘Spring Pictures’, written in 1915, and in particular in the six stories she published in the New Age between May and June 1917, after working as an extra in the cinema industry. Dramatic and cinematic techniques combine in these ‘experiments in dialogue’, which are marked by the erasure of the narrator and by a brisk syntax, and which may be considered as pseudo-scripts that readers turn into films through their imagination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Both Alpers and Kaplan discuss the recurrence of this technique in Mansfield’s autobiographical juvenile fiction as the symbolic equivalent of her psychological condition of alienation. Due both to her nonconforming sexuality and her cultural interest, the young Mansfield felt she did not ‘belong’ and projected herself onto different spaces. See S. J. Kaplan (1991) Katherine Mansfield and the Origins of Modernist Fiction (Ithaca and London: Cornell UP), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Hankin (1983) Katherine Mansfield and Her Confessional Stories (New York: St. Martin’s P), p. 224.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. See S. Freud (1962 [1930]) Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. and ed. J. Strachey (New York: Norton), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Baudelaire (1964) ‘The Painter of Modern Life’, in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, trans. and ed. J. Mayne (London: Phaidon P), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Baudelaire (1919) ‘Crowds’, trans. A. Symons, in Baudelaire: His Prose and Poetry, ed. T. R. Smith (New York: Boni and Liveright), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sandley, (2011) ‘Leaping into the Eyes: Mansfield as a Cinematic Writer’, in Celebrating Katherine Mansfield: A Centenary Volume of Essays, eds G. Kimber and J. Wilson (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The story was written in 1915, possibly in Paris. See A. Alpers (ed.) (1984) The Stories of Katherine Mansfield (Auckland, Melbourne, Oxford: Oxford UP), p. 554.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sergei Eisenstein famously discussed a dissolve that appears in Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities and that is likewise indicated by suspension marks. See S. Eisenstein, ‘Dickens, Griffith, and the Film Today’ (1944), in Film Form: Essays in Film Theory (1977 [1949]) ed. and trans. J. Leyda (San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt), pp. 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The ‘cinematic quality’ of this story has also been discussed by Julia Van Gunsteren, who relates it to the presence of recurring details which also serve ‘to unify later sections with the opening one’, ‘establishing a pattern of internal reference that creates unity in a basically fragmentary Impressionistic story.’ J. Van Gusteren (1990) Katherine Mansfield and Literary Impressionism (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antony Alpers, (1980) The Life of Katherine Mansfield (New York: The Viking P), p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Tchehov (3 May 1917) ‘In the Barber’s Saloon’, The New Age, 21.1: 19–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. F. (3 May 1917) ‘Military Instruction: An Impression’, The New Age, 21.1: 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Mansfield (1930) ‘A Ship Comes Into the Harbour’, Novels and Novelists (London: Constable), pp. 107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. H. New (1999) Reading Mansfield and Metaphors of Form (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In the early months of 1917 the author also wrote a play entitled A Ship in the Harbour, of which no trace is left, although we know that she had reached act three by April. See C. Tomalin (1987) Katherine Mansfield: A Secret Life (London: Viking), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Mansfield, To Bertrand Russell (16 January 1917), in The Collected Letters of Katherine Mansfield, vol. 1 (1903–1917) (1984) eds V. O’ Sullivan and M. Scott (Oxford: Clarendon P), p. 293.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. James (1953) Preface to The Awkward Age, in The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces, ed. R. P. Blackmur (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons), p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Mansfield (17 May 1917) ‘The Black Cap’, The New Age, 21.3: 62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. O’Sullivan (1997) Introduction, in New Zealand Stories, selected by V. O’Sullivan (Auckland: Oxford UP), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Maurizio Ascari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ascari, M. (2014). Beyond Impressionist Subjectivity. In: Cinema and the Imagination in Katherine Mansfield’s Writing. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400369_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics