Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

Starting from the idea that innovation in literature often results from hybridisation, the introduction focuses on nineteenth-century interart exchanges, in relation to the development of aestheticism, Impressionism, cinema and the short story. The introduction moves on to explore Mansfield’s fascination with the new medium, claiming that silent film can be used as a critical lens to reassess the author’s entire career, notably her striving after impersonality and empathy. To understand the influence of cinema on Mansfield this chapter takes into account not only the wide impact this medium had on the collective perception of reality but also concomitant phenomena such as the creation of fan magazines and incipient forms of remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. James (1995) The Tragic Muse, ed. P. Horne (Harmondsworth: Penguin), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See M. Ascari (1997) In the Palatial Chamber of the Mind: Comparative Essays on Henry James (Pescara: Tracce), pp. 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The concept of imagination is still central to contemporary discussions concerning cinema, as shown by studies such as G. Currie (1995) Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science (Cambridge: Cambridge UP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See G. P. Landow (1971) The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP), pp. 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Pater (1986 [1873]) ‘The School of Giorgione’, in The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry, ed. A. Phillips (Oxford and New York: Oxford UP), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Matz (2001) Literary Impressionism and Modernist Aesthetics (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Gaut (2010) A Philosophy of Cinematic Art (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), p. 306.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Bowen (1937) Introduction to The Faber Book of Modern Stories, in C. E. May (ed.) (1976) The New Short Story Theories (Athens, OH: Ohio UP), p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hanson (1989) Introduction to Re-reading the Short Story, ed. C. Hanson (Basingstoke’, Hampshire: Macmillan), p. 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Drewery (2011) Modernist Short Fiction by Women: The Liminal in Katherine Mansfield, Dorothy Richardson, May Sinclair and Virginia Woolf (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See G. Smith (2003) Dickens and the Dream of Cinema (Manchester: Manchester UP), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. A. Talbot (1914) Moving Pictures: How They Are Made and Worked (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company; London: William Heinemann), p. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Several studies have been devoted to the propaganda films that were produced in that period in Germany, Britain and the US. I will mention only a couple of texts: N. Reeves (1986) Official British Film Propaganda During the First World War (Beckenham, Kent: Croom Helm)

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Wood (1990) Film and Propaganda in America: A Documentary History — World War I, Volume I (Westport, CT: Greenwood P)

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Elsaesser (ed.) (1996) A Second Life: German Cinema’s First Decades (Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP), pp. 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. M. Hitchcock (May 1915) ‘The Relation of the Picture Play to Literature’, English Journal, 4.5: 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Shail (2012) The Cinema and the Origins of Literary Modernism (New York: Routledge), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Lennod (August 1913) ‘With Honor at Stake’, The Motion Pictures Story Magazine, 6.7: 17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See J. D. Bolter and R. Grusin (1996) ‘Remediation’, Configurations, 4.3: 338–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Harding Davis (March 1914) ‘Breaking into the Movies’, Scribners Magazine, 55.3: 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See D. Trotter (2007) Cinema and Modernism (London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Shklovsky (2008 [1923]) Literature and Cinematography, trans. I. Masinovsky, intro. R. Sheldon (Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive P), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Donald, A. Friedberg, L. Marcus (1998) ‘Preface’, in J. Donald, A. Friedberg and L. Marcus (eds), Close Up: Cinema and Modernism (London: Cassell), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Maurizio Ascari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ascari, M. (2014). Introduction. In: Cinema and the Imagination in Katherine Mansfield’s Writing. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400369_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics