Abstract
The ICRC’s three main objectives in the Second World War were to provide humanitarian assistance to as many people as it was able; to respond to the conflict’s spread and escalation by extending its operational purview and improving its capabilities; and, finally, to maintain its reputation and right to act, by upholding the sanctity of the Geneva and POW Conventions and adhering to the principles of neutrality and impartiality. The ICRC’s aim in short, was to expand, respond and adapt within the limits of its principles, as it always had, to the changing conditions of war. By contrast, the British Government’s humanitarian policy — the basis upon which its wartime relations with the ICRC were conducted — both lay at the periphery of its concerns and was restricted by the parameters of self-interest and political and strategic considerations. There were inevitable clashes between Whitehall and the ICRC on account of this divergence. The British Government came to depend greatly on the Committee, however, to maintain the health and well-being of the many British subjects who fell into captivity and, in no small part through its contretemps with Whitehall, the ICRC expanded in both ambition and operational purview during the Second World War.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
David P. Forsythe, ‘The ICRC: A Unique Humanitarian Protagonist’, International Review of the Red Cross 89.865 (2007), pp. 63–96 (89).
Brigette Troyon and Daniel Palmieri, ‘The ICRC Delegate: An Exceptional Humanitarian Player?’, International Review of the Red Cross 89.865 (2007), pp. 97–111.
David P. Forsythe, The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 202–3.
Jean-Claude Favez, The Red Cross and the Holocaust, eds and trans John Fletcher and Beryl Fletcher (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 21.
James Crossland, ‘A Man of Peaceable Intent: Burckhardt, the British and Red Cross Neutrality during the Second World War’, Historical Research 84.23 (2011), pp. 165–82.
Ironically, Ruegger was able to do much to better British–ICRC relations in the war’s final months, acting as a bridge between Geneva, Whitehall and Berne — Neville Wylie, Britain, Switzer land and the Second World War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 329.
Catherine Rey-Schyrr, De Yalta à Dien Bien Phu: Historie du Comit International de la Croix-Rouge 1945–1955 (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 2007), p. 43; TNA:FO 371/50603 – WO to FO, 3 August 1945; FO Minutes, 23 August 1945.
Michael Ignatieff, The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience (New York: Metropolitan, 2006), p. 158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 James Crossland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crossland, J. (2014). Conclusion. In: Britain and the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1939–1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399571_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399571_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48580-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39957-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)