Abstract
The occult was a way of knowing, an epistemic activity in the Middle Ages and the early modern period. In part it was a metaphysical query that investigated the operations and causes of hidden things. However, as the word ‘occult’ may suggest sorcery (sihr in Arabic) and demonology, this reconciliation with aetiology seems to be in stark contrast with the dictates of orthodox Islam. In the Qur’an we read: ‘it was the disbelieving devils. It was they who taught mankind sorcery […] they learn from them what enables them to separate a man from his wife. And they do no harm to anyone with their sorcery, save by God’s leave.’1 In the Hadith too we learn that sorcery is one of the seven major sins which include murder and apostasy.2 But if some extraordinary phenomenon can be proven not to be necessarily supernatural but is merely the case of natural yet hidden forces, then it cannot be the same as the sorcery of the devils. It would be a licit kind of knowledge and practice. In the medieval period – ninth to thirteenth centuries – the symbiotic relationship between astrology and magic was emphasized; one can say that the theories of astral influences were first articulated by Muslims in works on astrology and magic. The theories of astral influences in the context of astrology, discussed in the previous chapter, legitimized a magic that claimed to receive its power from the dynamics that govern the celestial and terrestrial worlds.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Abu al-Faraj Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn al-Nadim, The Fihrist: A Tenth Century AD Survey of Islamic Culture, ed. and trans. Bayard Dodge (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), p. 725.
Maslama al-Qurtubi [Pseudo-Majriti], Das Ziel des Weisen: The Arabic Text, ed. Helmut Ritter (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1933), p. 1.
Thabit ibn Qurra, ‘De imaginibus’, in The Astronomical Works of Thabit b. Qurra, ed. Francis J. Carmody (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960), pp. 167–99 (180).
Ibn Khaldun, The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, trans. Franz Rosenthal, 3 vols. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1958), III, p. 156.
Peter Adamson and Peter E. Pormann, ‘On Rays’, in The Philosophical Works of al-Kindi (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 217–41 (217);
Charles Burnett, ‘The Theory and Practice of Powerful Words in Medieval Magical Texts’, in The Word in Medieval Logic, Theology and Psychology, ed. Tetsuro Shimizu and Charles Burnett (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009), pp. 215–31 (215).
Hillary Wiesner, ‘The Cosmology of al-Kindi’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University, 1993), pp. 13, 34;
Peter Adamson, Al-Kindi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 190–1;
Pinella Travaglia, Magic, Causality and Intentionality: The Doctrine of Rays in al-Kindi (Florence: SISMEL, 1999), passim.
Adamson, al-Kindi, p. 189; Wiesner, The Cosmology of al-Kindi, p. 73; Marie-Thérèse D’Alverny and Françoise Hudry, ‘Al-Kindi: De radiis’, Archives d’historie doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 41 (1974), pp. 139–260 (139–51).
David C. Lindberg, ‘The Genesis of Kepler’s Theory of Light: Light Metaphysics from Plotinus to Kelper’, Osiris, 2/2 (October 1986), pp. 4–42 (9–10).
Plotinus, The Enneads, trans. Stephen Mackenna (London: Penguin Books, 1991), 5.1.6, 1.6.3.
Peter Adamson, The Arabic Plotinus: A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle (London: Duckworth, 2002), pp. 6–8.
’Abd al-Rahman Badawi, Aflatun ‘inda al-’arab (Cairo: Maktabat al-nahda al-misriyya, 1955), p. 6.
Abu Ma’shar al-Balkhi, Kitab al-madkhal al-kabir ila ’ilm ahkam al-nujum (The Great Introduction), ed. Richard Lemay, 9 vols. (Naples: Instituto Universitario Orientale, 1995–6), II, p. 36.
’Abd al-Rahman Badawi (ed.), Al-Usul al-yunaniyya li al-nathariyyat al-siyasiyya fi al-islam (Cairo: Maktabat al-nahda and masriyya, 1954), p. 69.
Willy Hartner, ‘Notes on the Picatrix’, Isis, 56/4 (Winter, 1965), pp. 438–51 (440).
David Pingree, ‘Some of the Sources of the Ghayat al-Hakim’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 43 (1980), pp. 1–15 (7–8).
Jean-Patrice Boudet, Anna Caiozzo and Nicolas Weill-Parot (eds.), Images et magie: Picatrix entre orient et occident (Paris: Honoré Champion, 2011), pp. 18–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Liana Saif
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saif, L. (2015). Arabic Theories of Astral Magic: The De radiis and the Picatrix. In: The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399472_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399472_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57399-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39947-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)