Skip to main content

Arabic Theories of Astral Magic: The De radiis and the Picatrix

  • Chapter
The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic ((PHSWM))

Abstract

The occult was a way of knowing, an epistemic activity in the Middle Ages and the early modern period. In part it was a metaphysical query that investigated the operations and causes of hidden things. However, as the word ‘occult’ may suggest sorcery (sihr in Arabic) and demonology, this reconciliation with aetiology seems to be in stark contrast with the dictates of orthodox Islam. In the Qur’an we read: ‘it was the disbelieving devils. It was they who taught mankind sorcery [] they learn from them what enables them to separate a man from his wife. And they do no harm to anyone with their sorcery, save by God’s leave.’1 In the Hadith too we learn that sorcery is one of the seven major sins which include murder and apostasy.2 But if some extraordinary phenomenon can be proven not to be necessarily supernatural but is merely the case of natural yet hidden forces, then it cannot be the same as the sorcery of the devils. It would be a licit kind of knowledge and practice. In the medieval period – ninth to thirteenth centuries – the symbiotic relationship between astrology and magic was emphasized; one can say that the theories of astral influences were first articulated by Muslims in works on astrology and magic. The theories of astral influences in the context of astrology, discussed in the previous chapter, legitimized a magic that claimed to receive its power from the dynamics that govern the celestial and terrestrial worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Abu al-Faraj Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn al-Nadim, The Fihrist: A Tenth Century AD Survey of Islamic Culture, ed. and trans. Bayard Dodge (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), p. 725.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maslama al-Qurtubi [Pseudo-Majriti], Das Ziel des Weisen: The Arabic Text, ed. Helmut Ritter (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1933), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thabit ibn Qurra, ‘De imaginibus’, in The Astronomical Works of Thabit b. Qurra, ed. Francis J. Carmody (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960), pp. 167–99 (180).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibn Khaldun, The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, trans. Franz Rosenthal, 3 vols. (New York: Pantheon Books, 1958), III, p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peter Adamson and Peter E. Pormann, ‘On Rays’, in The Philosophical Works of al-Kindi (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 217–41 (217);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Burnett, ‘The Theory and Practice of Powerful Words in Medieval Magical Texts’, in The Word in Medieval Logic, Theology and Psychology, ed. Tetsuro Shimizu and Charles Burnett (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009), pp. 215–31 (215).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillary Wiesner, ‘The Cosmology of al-Kindi’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University, 1993), pp. 13, 34;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peter Adamson, Al-Kindi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 190–1;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pinella Travaglia, Magic, Causality and Intentionality: The Doctrine of Rays in al-Kindi (Florence: SISMEL, 1999), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adamson, al-Kindi, p. 189; Wiesner, The Cosmology of al-Kindi, p. 73; Marie-Thérèse D’Alverny and Françoise Hudry, ‘Al-Kindi: De radiis’, Archives d’historie doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 41 (1974), pp. 139–260 (139–51).

    Google Scholar 

  11. David C. Lindberg, ‘The Genesis of Kepler’s Theory of Light: Light Metaphysics from Plotinus to Kelper’, Osiris, 2/2 (October 1986), pp. 4–42 (9–10).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Plotinus, The Enneads, trans. Stephen Mackenna (London: Penguin Books, 1991), 5.1.6, 1.6.3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peter Adamson, The Arabic Plotinus: A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle (London: Duckworth, 2002), pp. 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ’Abd al-Rahman Badawi, Aflatun ‘inda al-’arab (Cairo: Maktabat al-nahda al-misriyya, 1955), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abu Ma’shar al-Balkhi, Kitab al-madkhal al-kabir ila ’ilm ahkam al-nujum (The Great Introduction), ed. Richard Lemay, 9 vols. (Naples: Instituto Universitario Orientale, 1995–6), II, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ’Abd al-Rahman Badawi (ed.), Al-Usul al-yunaniyya li al-nathariyyat al-siyasiyya fi al-islam (Cairo: Maktabat al-nahda and masriyya, 1954), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Willy Hartner, ‘Notes on the Picatrix’, Isis, 56/4 (Winter, 1965), pp. 438–51 (440).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. David Pingree, ‘Some of the Sources of the Ghayat al-Hakim’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 43 (1980), pp. 1–15 (7–8).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jean-Patrice Boudet, Anna Caiozzo and Nicolas Weill-Parot (eds.), Images et magie: Picatrix entre orient et occident (Paris: Honoré Champion, 2011), pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Liana Saif

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saif, L. (2015). Arabic Theories of Astral Magic: The De radiis and the Picatrix. In: The Arabic Influences on Early Modern Occult Philosophy. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399472_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399472_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57399-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39947-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics