Advertisement

The Uses of Nostalgia: Re-Enacting Space and Time

  • Claudia Matus
Part of the Curriculum Studies Worldwide book series (CSWW)

Abstract

This chapter explores how the construction of “the international dimension” in universities is related to particular nostalgic temporal and spatial imaginations. As I already noted in chapter one, the most common institutional international initiatives are developed, mainly, through the exchange of students and faculty, the internationalization of curriculum, and the export of programs of study (e.g., English as a Second Language). One concern with these policies and practices that seek to develop an international dimension in research universities is that they uncritically imagine “international” space as the congregation of different nationalities, which are not separate from popular prefigured imaginations of countries that suffer from war violence, poverty, disease, and/or posses an “exotic culture,” among other characterizations. These practices of institutional internationalization—viewed as containing attractive, authentic, and contradictory cultures, lives, and essences—reproduce and naturalize a way to imagine and organize global space that reinscribes and reenacts particular ideas of nation, border, region, and more. These imaginaries not only perpetuate the idea of the “world at a glance” (Casey, 1999, p. 80), but also reproduce “natural” relations between people and nation. This way to imagine “international” space uses a form of nostalgia that reproduces a desire to reenact a “real” place (nation/country/culture) in an absolute time.

Keywords

International Student High Education Institution International Space International Education Global Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    To read other works on memory and space see Stephen Legg (2005). Contesting and surviving memory: space, nation, and nostalgia in Les Lieux de Mémoire. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, pp. 481–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Maria N. Yelenevskaya and Larisa Fialkova (2002). When Time and space are no longer the same: stories about immigration. Studia Mythologica Slavica V, Vol. 5, pp. 207–230.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    See also Claude Raffestin (2012). Space, territory, and territoriality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30, pp. 121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deborah Youdell (2006) Subjectivation and performative politics-Butler thinking Althusser and Foucaul: intelligibility, agency and the raced-nationed-religioned subjects of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), pp. 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3.
    See also Lilian Chee (2012). The domestic residue: feminist mobility and space in Simrym Gill’s art. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 19(6), pp. 750–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey-Ann Morrison (2010). Heterosexuality and Home: intimacies of space and spaces of touch. Emotion, Space and Society, xxx, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    See also Lauren Berlant (2008). Thinking about Feeling Historical. Emotion, Space and Society, 1, pp. 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Claudia Matus 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Matus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations