Skip to main content

“With New Acquist / of True Experience”: The Failed Revolutionary in the Letter to Heimbach and Samson Agonistes

  • Chapter
Typology and Iconography in Donne, Herbert, and Milton
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

I should like to return briefly to Donatello’s fifteenth-century sculpture, The Prophet Jeremiah (see figure 1.4). Donatello’s light yet powerful sculpture presents a statesman who stands upright, holding a paper or a small book in his left hand (perhaps one of the books he has composed), his right arm and part of his chest uncovered as he is draped in a long, flowing cloak, an icon out of classical antiquity. No melancholy subject here, he bears himself nobly, remaining proud and defiant even, we might assume, as the people do not heed his call and as Jerusalem falls. Knowing of Milton’s own sense of pride and defiance, we might imagine he would naturally fashion the self after this type of Jeremiah. A prophet, after all, is a politician. But the biblical Jeremiah is not this type of politician. Nor is Milton, who believed the English, like the Israelites before them, betrayed themselves into bondage. Like Jeremiah and like Samson—a biblical politician who happened to be a warrior—Milton placed the blame on the English people themselves. He probably did not feel he had failed in his duties, yet he must have wondered about the effectiveness of a prophet or a judge to whom few listen. He must have recognized, as well, that Jeremiah and Samson themselves are not blameless for their own failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Kenneth Clark, Civilisation: A Personal View (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1969), 121–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mary Ann Radzinowicz, Toward “Samson Agonistes”: The Growth of Milton’s Mind (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1978), 269–70 n.l.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the regenerative reading of Samson Agonistes, see John M. Steadman, “‘Faithful Champion’: The Theological Basis of Milton’s Hero of Faith,” Anglia 77 (1959), 13–28;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mary Ann Radzinowicz, “Eve and Dalila: Renovation and Hardening of the Heart,” in Reason and the Imagination: Studies in the History of Ideas, 1600–1800, ed. Joseph A. Mazeo (New York: Columbia UP, 1962), 155–81;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Don Cameron Allen, The Harmonious Vision: Studies in Milton’s Poetry (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins P, 1954), 82–94, on “Christian despair” and Samson’s regeneration;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geogia Christopher, Milton and the Science of the Saints (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1982), 225–54, on “the legend of a Hebrew hero who is an honorary puritan saint.”

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ashraf H. A. Rushdy, The Empty Garden: The Subject of Late Milton (Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1992), 292–306. Rushdy aligns himself with the following critics:

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. A. Wilkes, “The Interpretation of Samson Agonistes,” Huntington Library Quarterly, vol. XXXIV (1963), 363–79;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Irene Samuel, “Samson Affonistes as Tragedy,” in Calm of Mind, ed. Joseph Anthony Wittreich, Jr. (Cleveland: Case Western Reserve UP, 1971), 235–57;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph Anthony Wittreich, Jr., Interpreting “Samson Agonistes” (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1986);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. John Carey, Milton (London: Evans Brothers, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanley Fish, “Spectacle and Evidence in Samson AgonistesCritical Inquiry, vol. XV, no. 3 (Spring 1989), 556–86. Rushdy disagrees with the regenerative-reading critics who “misconstrue Milton’s theological claims for the process and effects of regeneration and misread Milton’s play to make it fit this misconstructed theological pattern” (293). Such critics offer a theory “based not only on a misreading of the play but also on a commensurate misconstruction of Milton’s doctrine of regeneration” (296). Rushdy, therefore, views “with skepticism such enthusiastic, because ill-informed, arguments as Morris Freedman’s that Samson’s ‘newstrength is, simply, self-generated, self-controlled.’ This is simply untrue to Milton’s doctrine and his drama” (297). (For Freedman’s argument see “Waiting for Samson: The Modernity of Samson Agonistes” Milton Quarterly 13 [1979], 42–45.) Rushdy asserts “that because of Samson’s failure in transforming his ‘self into a subject of God, a failure caused by his inability to employ his reason in the act of self-knowledge, he loses his agential liberty and becomes, instead, subject to God” (281); Samson’s faith is “puerile…at best” (295); “Samson is incapable of rousing himself to unwavering faith,” and he cannot “act” properly because he has lost ‘reason’“ (295–96). What we are faced with in this reading is a “late Milton” who, when he writes Samson Agonistes, stumbles egregiously—assuming Milton did not intend to present a Samson as unattractive and unenlightened as Rushdy’s Samson.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph Anthony Wittreich, Jr., Visionary Poetics: Milton’s Tradition and His Legacy (San Marino: Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery, 1979), 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. William Kerrigan, The Prophetic Milton (Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1974), 201, 202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John C. Ulreich, Jr., “‘Beyond the Fifth Act’: Samson Agonistes as Prophecy,” Milton Studies 17 (1983), 284.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jackie Di Salvo, “‘The Lord’s Battels’: Samson Agonistes and the Puritan Revolution,” Milton Studies 4 (1972), 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laurence Sterne and Harold H. Kollmeier, A Concordance to the English Prose of John Milton (Binghamton: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, vol. 35, 1985), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, “Milton’s Samson and the ‘New Acquist of True [Political] Experience,” Milton Studies 24 (1989), 235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Reuben Sánchez

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sánchez, R. (2014). “With New Acquist / of True Experience”: The Failed Revolutionary in the Letter to Heimbach and Samson Agonistes . In: Typology and Iconography in Donne, Herbert, and Milton. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397805_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics