Skip to main content

Democracy Is Not the Only Game in Town! Democratic and Authoritarian Attitudes in Indonesia, Korea, and Thailand

  • Chapter
Incomplete Democracies in the Asia-Pacific

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific Series ((CSAP))

Abstract

What citizens know and think about democracy is key to whether and how democracy endures in any country. Traditional interpretations of Asian political cultures suggest that people anchor their support for democracy on cultural values, or socio-economic circumstances, or knowledge of what democracy is and does around the world. Instead, this chapter argues that citizens anchor their support for democracy on their understanding of the concept of democracy, which becomes key to understand the dynamics of democratization and democratic consolidation in Asia. The chapter further discusses the tension between citizens’ views of democracy and their attitudinal support toward authoritarian, technocratic, military, and democratic political systems and shows that the consistency and depth of support for democracy as ‘the only game in town’ is shallow at best, and that in Indonesia, Korea, and Thailand authoritarian attitudes are as popular and appealing as democratic ones in spite of their citizens’ conceptions of democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Democratic theory identifies democratic transition as the initial movement away from an authoritarian system during which there is a replacement of the non-democratic institutions and procedures. Necessary aspects of this transition are the implementation of new rules governing the political process and an initial willingness on the part of political actors to follow these newly established rules. According to democratic theory, transition ends with the first democratic elections and the assumption of power by the democratically elected government. Guillermo O’Donnel and Philippe Schmitter. 1990. “Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies”. In G. O’Donnell, Schmitter Philippe and Lawrence Whitehead (Eds.), Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jie Lu. 2012. “Democratic Conceptions in East Asian Societies: A Contextualized Analysis”. Paper prepared for the conference on “How the Public Views Democracy and its Competitors in East Asia: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective” Stanford University, Stanford, May 25–26, 2012;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larry Diamond Jay and Marc F. Plattner. 2008. How People View Democracy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur H. Miller, Vicki Miller and William Reisinger. 1997. “Conceptions of Democracy Among Mass and Elite in Post-Soviet Societies”. British Journal of Political Science 27: 157–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Bratton, Robert Mattes and E. Gyimah-Boadi. 2004. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel Lerner. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seymour Martin Lipset. 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alex Inkeles and David H. Smith. 1974. Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Michael S. Lewis-Beck. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sebastian Pompe. 2005. A Study of Institutional Collapse. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bert Hofman and Kai A. Kaiser. 2002. The Making of the Big Bang and Its Aftermath: A Political Economy Perspective. Paper presented at Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia?, a conference sponsored by the International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, May 1–3, 2002, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aurel Croissant. 2002. “Strong Presidents, Weak Democracy? Presidents, Parliaments and Political Parties in South Korea”. Korea Observer 33(1): 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellen Carnaghan. 2011. “The Difficulty of Measuring Support for Democracy in a Changing Society: Evidence from Russia”. Democratization 18(3): 682–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Dalton, Doh Chull Shin and Willy Jou. 2007. “Understanding Democracy: Data from Unlikely Places”. Journal of Democracy 18(4): 142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Miller, V. Helsi and W. Reisinger. 1997. “Conceptions of Democracy Among Mass and Elite in Post-Soviet Societies”. British Journal of Political Science 27(2): 157–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Rose, William Mishler and Christian W. Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. H. Taylor. 1996. The Politics of Elections Southeast Asia. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Russell Dalton. 1999. “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies”. In Pippa Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert A. Dahl. 1997. “Development and Democratic Culture”. In Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu and Hung-mao Tien (Eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Bratton, Robert Mattes and E. Gyimah-Boadi. 2005. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richard Rose, William Mishler and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richard Rose, William Mishler and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1999. “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis”. In Pippa Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. William Mishler and Richard Rose. 2001. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust?” Comparative Political Studies 34: 30–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pippa Norris (Eds.). 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Larry Diamond. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doh Chull Shin. 2007. “Democratization: Perspectives from Global Citizenry”. In Russel Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. G. McGee investigates the main features of the growth, characteristics, and roles of the great cities in Southeast Asia in an attempt to illustrate the function of the primate cities as the locale, where the colonial common heritage, cultural diversity, and widely varying economic and political systems come together to push forward the overall development of Southeast Asian countries. See, T. G. McGee. 1967. The Southeast Asian City. A Social Geography of the Primate Cities of Southeast Asia. New York: Praeger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alex Inkeles and David Smith. 1974. Becoming Modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Giovanna Maria Dora Dore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dore, G.M.D. (2014). Democracy Is Not the Only Game in Town! Democratic and Authoritarian Attitudes in Indonesia, Korea, and Thailand. In: Dore, G.M.D., Ku, J.H., Jackson, K.D. (eds) Incomplete Democracies in the Asia-Pacific. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397508_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics