Abstract
It is clear from the analysis above of the consultation papers, including the Middleton Report (and reference back to the policy of Lord Mackay), that there was a seamless policy approach between one administration and the next that legal aid for money claims needed to be curtailed. Encouraging CFA funding would have a part in this, with, no doubt, exhortation to increase the take up of BTE insurance. While Lord Irvine as Shadow Lord Chancellor was less sanguine about the level of success fees and more concerned about clients’ interests than lawyers’ rewards,1 the approach was essentially shared by both parties and the Civil Service.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. Kunzlik (1999), ‘Conditional Fees: The Ethical and Organisational Impact on the Bar’, Modern Law Review, 62(6) pp. 850–878.
H. Bochel & C. Bochel (2004), UK Social Policy Process (Basingstoke: Palgrave) p. 70.
Discussed in J. Peysner (January 2004), ‘Predictability and Budgeting’, Civil Justice Quarterly, 23 pp. 15–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 John Peysner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peysner, J. (2014). Where Did the Recoverability Policy Come From?. In: Access to Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397232_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397232_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48483-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39723-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)