Abstract
Friendship in International Relations (IR) is generally regarded either as a utopian project, which implies that scholars must separate the idealistic notion of friendship from ‘real’ international politics, or it is seen as potentially destructive and harmful because such alleged ‘cheap talk’ promises a false state of certainty that others are eager to exploit, which suggests that scholars should disregard the concept altogether. This volume hopes to correct this reductionist approach to friendship in IR by providing a more substantial and varied conceptualisation, as well as empirical verification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buzan, B. and R. J. Barry Jones (1981) (eds) Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension (London: Frances Pinter).
Holsti, K. J. (1998) The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory. Working Paper 26 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).
Kacowicz, A. M. and Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (2000) ‘Stable Peace: A Conceptual Framework’, in A. M. Kacowicz, Y. Bar-Siman-Tov, O. Elgström, and M. Jerneck (eds) Stable Peace Among Nations (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield), 11–35.
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Simon Koschut and Andrea Oelsner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koschut, S., Oelsner, A. (2014). Conclusion. In: Koschut, S., Oelsner, A. (eds) Friendship and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137396341_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137396341_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48459-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39634-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)