Skip to main content

Technological Literacy as a Creative Process of Becoming Other

  • Chapter
Book cover New Frontiers in Technological Literacy

Abstract

Samuel Butler offers a somewhat dystopic view of Victorian society in his now famous satire, Erewhon, published in 1872. In it, he tells the story of a fictitious country where the strange inhabitants have formed a society that forbids the use of modern technology (only old, established, and nonthreatening technology is allowed). This society actively suppresses any expression of originality, experimentation, or creativity. It further contends that individual scholarship can only ever be made manifest in a curriculum that develops proficiency in the study of what is referred to as “unreason and hypothetics.” Indeed, a venerable Erewhonian professor of worldly wisdom states that “it is not our business to help students to think for themselves. Surely that is the very last thing which one who wishes them well should encourage them to do. Our duty is to ensure that they shall think as we do, or at any rate, as we hold” (189).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bellis, M. (2013). History of the atomic bomb and the Manhattan Project. Retrieved October 5, 2013, from http://inventors.about.com/od/astartinventions/a/atomicbomb.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2013). “Not knowing” as a pedagogical strategy in the sciences. Radical Pedagogy 10(2). Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. (1985). Erewhon. London, UK: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J. R. (2014). Toward a philosophy for (a new) technology education. In John R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Toward an epistemological framework (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London, UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason. London, UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Bersonism. New York, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Brian Massumi, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1984). Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics (peregrines). New York, NY: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insignificance. (1985) Movie released in 1985. Directed by Nicolas Roag. Produced by Alexander Stuart and Jeremy Thomas. Recorded Picture Company Zenith Productions. United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, N. (2011). Deleuze, values, and normativity. In N. Jun & D.W. Smith (Eds.),Deleuze and ethics (pp. 89–107). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson-Tancred, H. (1995). Aristotle. In A. C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy: A guide through the subject (pp. 398–439). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1968). Selected works. New York, NY: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roffe, J. (2005). Multiplicity. In Adrian Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 176–177). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagoll, C. (2005). Becoming. In Adrian Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (pp. 21–22). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studtmann, P. (2007). Aristotle’s categories. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved August 9, 2013, from http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle -categories/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tampio, N. (2010). Multiplicity. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of political theory (pp. 912–913). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412958660.n294. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.sage-ereference.com/political theory/Article_n294.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John R. Dakers

Copyright information

© 2014 John R. Dakers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dakers, J.R. (2014). Technological Literacy as a Creative Process of Becoming Other. In: Dakers, J.R. (eds) New Frontiers in Technological Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394750_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics