Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter performs a dual role: it offers an overview of critical pedagogy, which is central to a number of chapters that follow, whilst at the same time presents an assessment of the potential benefits of deploying critical pedagogy in higher education (HE) for generating greater criticality and visions of a more democratic, humane, sociallyjust future. In doing this, it draws on a case study in applying critical pedagogy in English HE practised by the author. The argument set out is that, given the increasingly detrimental impact of neo-liberal restructuring on academia (see Bailey and Freedman 2011, Ball 2012, Beckmann and Cooper 2013), there is an urgent need for more radical approaches to teaching and learning in HE, approaches better able to generate more insightful critical appreciations of the imposed ‘order of things’ in contemporary times. Young people, democracy and broader societal well-being continue to be threatened by the neo-liberal project. Once the urgency of this agenda for HE has been established, the chapter will return to outline the emergence of critical pedagogy in Western thinking and introduce the reader to key exponents who have, in different ways, shaped the framework devised for this case study — more specifically, Paulo Freire, Peter McLaren, Henry Giroux and bell hooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • S.J. Ball (2012) ‘Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-Spy guide to the Neoliberal University’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 60:1, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Bacino (2014) ‘Shock figures show extent of self-harm in teenagers’, The Guardian, 21 May, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bailey and D. Freedman (2011) The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Bauman (2004) Wasted Lives: Modernity and its Outcasts (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Beckmann and C. Cooper (2013) ‘Neoliberal globalisation, managerialism and higher education in England: Challenging the imposed “Order of Things”’, Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 8:1, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bourdieu (1993) The Field of Cultural Production (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Bruce (2008) ‘Introduction’ in T. More, F. Bacon, H. Neville (edited by S. Bruce) Three Early Modern Utopias (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Chambers (1992) Rural Appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed and Participatory, Discussion Paper 311 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Chambers (1996) Relaxed and Participatory Appraisal: Notes of Practical Approaches and Methods (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cohen (2001) States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Connolly (2013) ‘Don’t want a lost generation? Then copy us, says Merkel’, The Guardian, 3 July, 1 and 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cooper (2002) Understanding School Exclusion: Challenging Processes of Docility (Nottingham: Education Now Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cooper (2008) Community, Conflict and the State: Rethinking Notions of ‘Safety’, ‘Cohesion’ and ‘Wellbeing’ (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • C. Cooper (2010) ‘Responding to Britain’s unhappy childhoods: Enhancing young people’s well-being through participatory action research’ in I. Greener, C. Holden and M. Kilkey (eds.) Social Policy Review 22, Analysis and debate in social policy, 2010 (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Darder, M.P. Baltodano and R.D. Torres (eds.) (2009) The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 2nd Edition (Abingdon/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M.R. Duncan-Andrade and E. Morrell (2008) The Art of Critical Pedagogy: Possibilities for Moving from Theory to Practice in Urban Schools (New York: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Edgar (2012) ‘Value added’, Guardian Review, 7 January, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Freire (1996) Pedagogy of the Oppressed (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Giroux (1983) Theory and Resistance in Education (South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Giroux (2009a) Youth in a Suspect Society: Democracy or Disposability? (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Giroux (2009b) ‘Critical theory and educational Practice’ in A. Darder, M.P. Baltodano and R.D. Torres (eds.) The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 2nd Edition (Abingdon/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Giroux (2011) On Critical Pedagogy (New York: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Giroux (2013) Youth in Revolt: Reclaiming a Democratic Future (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Guetzkow (2002) ‘How the arts impact communities: An introduction to the literature on arts impact studies’, paper presented to the Taking the Measure of Culture Conference, Princeton University, 7–8 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Healey (2005) ‘Linking research and teaching: Disciplinary spaces’ in R. Barnett (ed.) Reshaping the University: New Relationships Between Research, Scholarship and Teaching (Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • W.S. Hesford (2006) ‘Staging Terror’, The Drama Review, 50:3, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Holdsworth and M. Luckhurst (eds.) (2008) A Concise Companion to Contemporary British and Irish Drama (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • b. hooks (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • b. hooks (2009) ‘Confronting Class in the Classroom’ in A. Darder, M.P. Baltodano and R.D. Torres (eds.) The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 2nd Edition (Abingdon/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jones (2010) ‘Interdisciplinary Approach — Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies’, ESSAI, 7:1, Article 26, http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/26, accessed 14 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Jones and C. Novak (2000) ‘Class struggle, self help and popular welfare’ in M. Lavalette and G. Mooney (eds.) Class Struggle and Social Welfare (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Ledwith (2011) Community Development: A Critical Approach, 2nd Edition (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Levitas (2013) Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • P. McLaren (2009) ‘Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts’ in A. Darder, M.P. Baltodano and R.D. Torres (eds.) The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 2nd Edition (Abingdon/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Morgan (2000) ‘Critical pedagogy: The spaces that make the difference’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 8:3, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Paget (1987) ‘“Verbatim theatre”: Oral history and documentary techniques’, New Theatre Quarterly, 3:2, 317–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pearson (2001) Theatre/Archaeology: Disciplinary Dialogues (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • (QAA) Quality Assurance Agency (2007) Sociology (Mansfield: QAA).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ramesh (2012) ‘Analysis: Poor families, poorer research’, The Guardian, 12 June, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Rodger (2008) Criminalising Social Policy: Anti-Social Behaviour and Welfare in a De-Civilised Society (Cullompton: Willan).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Toynbee (2012) ‘This vilification campaign against the poor is so clever’, The Guardian, 12 June, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • (UNICEF) The United Nations Children’s Fund (2007) Child Poverty in Perspective: An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries (Florence: UNICEF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Wadsworth (1984) Do It Yourself Social Research (Melbourne: Victorian Council of Social Service & Melbourne Family Care Organisation).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Wright Mills (1959) The Sociological Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Charlie Cooper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, C. (2015). Critical Pedagogy in Higher Education. In: Cooper, C., Gormally, S., Hughes, G. (eds) Socially Just, Radical Alternatives for Education and Youth Work Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393593_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics