Skip to main content

Researching the Human Side of Management Control: Using Survey-Based Methods

  • Chapter
Management Control and Uncertainty

Abstract

One of the more important internal factors determining the performance of (business) organizations is the human behaviour that originates within them. Using archival data, Hansen & Werner felt (1989) find that twice as much of the variance in firm performance is due to factors related to human behaviour than is due to economic factors. More recently, the importance of human behaviour has arguably increased due to the heightened levels of uncertainty firms currently face. Firms faced with uncertainty from growth opportunities due to technological innovations and the development of emerging markets saw opportunities for global expansion and earnings growth. However, lately, uncertainty has been fuelled by pressures in the capital markets and a sense of consumer pessimism. As firms struggle to maintain their earnings, human behaviour becomes increasingly important. Statements such as “Every crisis is a human crisis” (Braverman, 2003, p. 141) and ‘It is often the (mis) hand ling of crises, not the crisis itself, that can have the most consequences” (James and Wooten, 2005, p. 141) illustrate the importance of human behaviour to firm performance (see also Otley, 1994). It is imperative that firms align human behaviour within the organization to maximize its positive effect on performance and to achieve their organizational objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, P. S. & Chen, C. X. (2011). Combining Creativity and Control: Understanding Individual Motivation in Large-Scale Collaborative Creativity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, M. (2003). Managing the Human Impact of Crisis. Risk Management, 50(5), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney, L. & Widener, S. K. (2007). Strategic Performance Measurement Systems, Job-Relevant Information and Managerial Behavioral Responses — Role Stress and Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney, L., Henle, C. & Widener, S. K. (2009). A Path Model Examining the Relations Among Strategic Performance Measurement System Characteristics, Organizational Justice, and Extra-and In-Role Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development. Organization Science, 12: 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. & Birkett, B. (2004). Managing Intellectual Capital in a Professional Service Firm: Exploring the Creativity-Productivity Paradox. Management Accounting Research, IS (March), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. S. & Kihn, L. A. (2009). Information System Integration, Enabling Control and Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. X., Williamson, M. G. & Zhou, F. H. (2012). Reward System Design and Group Creativity: An Experimental Investigation. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1885–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2005). Integrative Strategic Performance Measurement Systems, Strategic Alignment of Manufacturing, Learning and Strategic Outcomes: An Exploratory Study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management Control System Design within Its Organizational Context: Findings from Contingency-Based Research and Directions for the Future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, V. K. & Chong, K. M. (2002). Budget Goal Commitment and Information Effects of Budget Participation on Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davilla. A. G. (2000). An Empirical Study on the Drivers of Management Control Systems’ Design in New Product Development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25: 383–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davilla, A., Fosters, G. &Li, M. (2009). Reasons for Management Control Systems Adoption: Insights from Product Development Systems Choice by Early-State Entrepreneurial Companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 322–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D., Smyth, J. D. & Melani, L. (2008). Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with Uncertainty in Knowledge-Intensive Firms. The Role of Management Control Systems as Knowledge Integration Mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29: 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, G. G. (1994). Integrating Case Study and Survey Research Methods: An Example in Information Systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3, 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual Tuning in a Supportive Context: Joint Contributions of Positive Mood, Negative Mood, and supervisory Behaviors to Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. S. & Wernerfeit, B. (1989). Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq, I. U., Ali, A., Azeem, M. U., Hijazi, S. T., Qurashi, T. M. & Quyyum, A. (2010). Mediation Role of Employee Engagement in Creative Work Process on the Relationship of Transformational Leaders and Employee Creativity. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 25, 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, J. (2006). Management Control Systems and Strategy: A Resource-Based Perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 529–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E. H. & Wooten, L. P. (2005). Leadership as (Un)Usual: How to Display ompetence in Times of Crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 34(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, E. P., Merchant, K. A. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2009). National Differences in Incentive Compensation Practices: The Differing Roles of Financial Performance Measurement in the United States and the Netherlands. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachelmeier, S. J., Reichert, B. E. & Williamson, M. G. (2008). Measuring and Motivating Quantity, Creativity, or Both. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(2), 341–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachelmeier, S. J. & Williamson, M. G. (2010). Attracting Creativity: The Initial and Aggregate Effects of Contract Selection on Creativity-Weighted Productivity. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1669–1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E.,Mossholder, K. W. & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis Using Work Groups and Individuals. Journal of Management, 23(6), 775–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational Learning and Management Control Systems: Responding to Environmental Change. Management Accounting Research, 8, 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruis, A. & Widener, S. K. (2014). Managerial Influence in Performance Measurement System Design: A Recipe for Failure? Behavioral Research in Accounting. In Pres

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. M. & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral Effects of Nonfinancial Performance Measures: The Role of Procedural Fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. & Widener, S. K. (2014). The Performance Effects of Using Management Control Systems for Exploitation and Exploration Learning. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass, V. S. & Mateja, M. (2009). Balancing the Dual Responsibilities of Business Unit Controllers: Field and Survey Evidence. The Accounting Review, 84, 1233–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmi, T. & Brown, D. B. (2008). Management Control Systems as a Package-Opportunities, Challenges and Research Directions. Management Accounting Research, 19, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough III, E. F. & Leifer, R. (1983). Using Simultaneous Structures to Cope with Uncertainty. A cademy of Management Journal, 26(3), 727–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, A. I., Sedatole, K. L. & Lankton, N. K. (2011). Integrated Information Systems and Alliance Partner Trust. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(3), 1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. (1994). Management Control in Contemporary Organizations: Towards a Wider Framework. Management Accounting Research, 5, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. (1999). Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research. Management Accounting Research, 10, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators, journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley C. E., Zhou, J. & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speklé, R. R, Van Elten, H. J. & Widener, S. K. (2014). Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M. & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, and Performance. Academy of Management journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W, Chi, N., Grandey A. A. & Fung, S. (2011). Positive Group Affective Tone and Team Creativity: Negative Group Affective Tone and Team Trust as Boundary Conditions, journal of Organizational behavior, 33, 638–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stede, W.A., Young, S. M. & Chen, C. X. (2005). Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Empirical Management Accounting Research: The Case of Survey Studies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30: 655–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R. & Blaskovich, J. (2012). The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Budget Participation-Job Performance Relationship, journal of Management Accounting Research, 24(2012), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Liao, H., Zhan, Y. & Shi, J. (2011). Daily Customer Mistreatment and Employee Sabotage against Customers: Examining Emotion and Resource Perspectives. Academy of Management journal, 54(2), 312–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widener, S. K. (2007). An Empirical Analysis of the Levers of Control Framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 757–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widener, S. K. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of the Relation between the Strategic Use of Human Capital and the Design of the Management Control System. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 377–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening Employee Creativity: The Role of Leader Emotional Intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 545–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Sally Widener

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Widener, S. (2014). Researching the Human Side of Management Control: Using Survey-Based Methods. In: Otley, D., Soin, K. (eds) Management Control and Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137392121_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics