Skip to main content

Abstract

Although understandings of the human person are foundational to social science theory and research, sociologists reflect less on the characteristics of personhood than we do concepts such as structure and culture.1 Although sociologists rarely engage in ontological debates about personhood, the social sciences nonetheless often contain unstated views of the person that give rise to conflicting accounts of human motivation and the interaction between structure, culture, and agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1984. Treatise on the Virtues. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2003. Structure, Agency, and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2011. “‘Caritas en Veritate’ and Social Love.” International Journal of Public Theology 5:273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. [1975] 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, John F. 2004. Personalist Papers. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1971. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, Philip S. 2012. “Recovered Goods: Durkheimian Sociology as Virtue Ethics.” Pp. 77–104 in The Post-Secular in Question, edited by P. Gorski, D. K. Kim, J. Torpey, and J. Antwerpen. New York: New York University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, Vincent. 1993. “Virtue and Attraction: Validation of a Measure of Love.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10:91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Donald Nathan. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair C. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair C. [1981] 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain, Jacques. 1947. The Person and the Common Good. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurin, Peter. 1984. Easy Essays. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, Richard, ed. 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Christopher and Martin E. P. Seligman. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, Joseph. 1997. Faith, Hope and Love. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricceur, Paul. 1992. Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, R. Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, R. Andrew. 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiesing, Kevin. N.d. A History of Personalism. Grand Rapids, MI: Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtyla, Karol. 1979. The Acting Person. Boston: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Vincent Jeffries

Copyright information

© 2014 Vincent Jeffries

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mooney, M.A. (2014). Virtues and Human Personhood in the Social Sciences. In: Jeffries, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391865_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics