Abstract
This chapter spotlights the contribution of Marcus Felson’s work, specifically Routine Activity Theory and its outgrowths, to the work of the police crime analyst. In the environmental criminology field, the term “crime analysis” is used to denote what researchers, theorists, and practitioners do in a variety of ways to understand and analyse crime (that is, “Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis” or ECCA) (Wortley & Mazerolle, 2008). However, in the context of this chapter, crime analysis is used more deliberately. That is, a police crime analyst is not anyone who analyses crime, but is someone specifically employed by a police department. The crime analyst examines crime and calls for service data, identifies patterns of crime, conducts statistical analysis, and assists with problem solving of long-and short-term problems (Santos, 2012). A police crime analyst’s main responsibilities are to help police deploy their crime reduction efforts, evaluate the agency’s effectiveness in addressing crime and disorder, and to be an overall authority on the analysis of crime within the agency (Santos, 2012). Consequently, this chapter contends that police crime analysis is fundamentally grounded in applying Routine Activity Theory and its concepts through the practical perspective of the theory, the adoption of problem-oriented policing strategies, and the focus of police crime reduction on geography and the clustering of crime by place. I would argue that Routine Activity Theory is one of the cornerstones of police crime analyst work and that Marcus Felson can be touted as one of the architects of modern crime analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bichler, G., & Gaines, L. (2005). An examination of police officers’ insights into problem identification and problem solving. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 53–74.
Boba, R. (2010). A practice-based evidence approach in Florida. Police Practice and Research, 11, 122–128.
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2012). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, D0I:10.1080/07418825.2012.673632.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Environmental Criminology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clarke, R. V. (1980). “Situational” crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.
Clarke, R. V. (1983). Situational crime prevention: Its theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 4, 225–256.
Clarke, R. V., & Eck, J. (2005). Crime analysis for problem solvers: In 60 small steps. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Cohen, M., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (2001). Repeat victimization. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Felson, M. (2006). Crime and nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Felson, M., & Boba, R. (2010). Crime and everyday life (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 24, 236–258.
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2004). The burglary as a clue to the future: The beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 237–255.
Johnson, S. D., Summers, L., & Pease, K. (2007). Vehicle crime: Communicating spatial and temporal patterns. London, UK: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science.
Johnson, S. D., Summers, L., & Pease, K. (2009). Offenders as forager: A direct test of the boost account of victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181–200.
McLaughlin, L., Johnson, S. D., Bowers, K. J., Birks, D. J., & Pease K. (2006). Police perceptions of the long-and short-term spatial distribution of residential burglary. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 9, 99–111.
POP Center (2014). Problem-specific guides. http://www.popcenter.org/problems/
Ratcliffe, J. H., & McCullagh, M. (2001). Chasing ghosts? Police perception of high crime areas. The British Journal of Criminology, 41, 330–341.
Santos, R. B. (2012). Crime analysis with crime mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Santos, R. G. (2013). A quasi-experimental test and examination of police effectiveness in residential burglary and theft from vehicle micro-time hot spots. Dissertation. Nova Southeastern University.
Sherman, L. (1998). Ideas in American policing: Evidence-based policing. Washington DC: Police Foundation.
Sherman, L., Buerger, M., & Gartin, P. (1989). Repeat call address policing: The Minneapolis RECAP experiment. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.
Weisburd, D. L., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Weisburd, D., Telep, C. & Braga, A. (2010). The importance of place in policing: Empirical evidence and policy recommendations. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, Information, and Publications.
Wortley, R., & Mazerolle, L. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Rachel Boba Santos
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santos, R.B. (2015). Routine Activity Theory: A Cornerstone of Police Crime Analyst Work. In: Andresen, M.A., Farrell, G. (eds) The Criminal Act. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48291-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39132-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)