Abstract
Routine activity theory emphasizes the relevance of regular and routine behaviours for an understanding of crime patterns (Clarke & Felson, 1993). While the approach is most commonly used to explain aggregate trends and behaviours in society, it can also be employed to analyse individual-level behaviour in a crime investigation. By treating the time and place of a crime as clues and using what is known about the offence and victim, the routine activity crime equation may sometimes be manipulated to provide information about the offender.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beavon, D. J. K., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 2, 115–148.
Bernasco, W. (2008). Them again? Same-offender involvement in repeat and near repeat burglaries. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 411–431.
Bevis, C., & Nutter, J. B. (1977). Changing street layouts to reduce residential burglary. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. Western Criminology Review, 5(3), 12–24.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1998). Environmental criminology: From theory to urban planning practice. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 7, 1–30.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In R. Wortley, & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, 78–93.
Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. In R. V. Clarke, & M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 259–294.
Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (Eds.). (1993). Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
Cromwell, P. F., Olson, J. N., & Avary, D. W. (1990). Residential burglary: An ethnographic analysis. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Davies, A., & Dale, A. (1995). Locating the stranger rapist (Special Interest Series: Paper 3). London: Police Research Group, Home Office Police Department.
Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Beauregard, E. (2010). Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent class analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 315–342.
Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. L. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In J. E. Eck, & D. L. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime prevention studies. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 4, 1–33.
Felson, M. (1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal control, and criminal outcomes. In D. B. Cornish, & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag, 119–128.
Felson, M. (1987). Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology, 25, 911–931.
Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police Research Series: Paper 98). London: Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.
Ford, D. A. (1990). Investigating serial murder: The case of Indiana’s “Gay Murders.” In S. A. Egger (Ed.), Serial murder: An elusive phenomenon. New York: Praeger, 113–133.
Goodwill, A. M., & Alison, L. J. (2006). The development of a filter model for prioritizing suspects in burglary offences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 395–416.
Hanfland, K. A., Keppel, R. D., & Weis, J. G. (1997). Case management for missing children homicide investigation. Seattle: Washington State Office of the Attorney General.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: Are cul-de-sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 89–111.
Johnson, S. D., Summers, L., & Pease, K. (2009). Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181–200.
Markson, L., Woodhams, J., & Bond, J. (2010). Linking serial residential burglary: Comparing the utility of modus operandi behaviours, geographical proximity, and temporal proximity. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 91–107.
Ouimet, M., & Proulx, J. (1994, November). Spatial and temporal behaviour of pedophiles: Their clinical usefulness as to the relapse prevention model. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Miami, FL.
Pearson, P. (1997). When she was bad: Violent women and the myth of innocence. Toronto: Random House.
Pease, K. (1998). Repeat victimisation: Taking stock (Crime Detection and Prevention Series: Paper 90). London: Police Research Group, Home Office.
Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C., & Pease, K. (1990). Repeat break-and-enter victimisation: Time course and crime prevention opportunity. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 8–11.
Reynald, D. M. (2010). Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 358–390.
Reynald, D. M. (2011). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 110–142.
Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Rossmo, D. K. (2006). Geographic profiling in cold case investigations. In R. Walton (Ed.), Cold case homicides: Practical investigative techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 537–560.
Rossmo, D. K., Allen, J., & Summers, L. (March 2013). “Connecting the dots”: Spatial and temporal linkage factors in serial murder. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Dallas, TX.
Rossmo, D. K., Davies, A., & Patrick, M. (2004). Exploring the geo-demographic and distance relationships between stranger rapists and their offences (Special Interest Series: Paper 16). London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
Sacco, V. F., & Kennedy, L. W. (1996). The criminal event. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Tompson, L., & Bowers, K. (2013). A stab in the dark? A research note on temporal patterns of street robbery. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 616–631.
Tonkin, M., Woodhams, J., Bull, R., & Bond, J. W. (2012). Behavioral case linkage with solved and unsolved cases. Forensic Science International, 222, 146–153.
Walker, J. T., Golden, J., & Van Houten, A. (2001). The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activities approach. Justice Research Policy, 3(2), 15–33.
Wright, R. T., & Decker, S. H. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 D. Kim Rossmo and Lucia Summers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rossmo, D.K., Summers, L. (2015). Routine Activity Theory in Crime Investigation. In: Andresen, M.A., Farrell, G. (eds) The Criminal Act. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48291-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39132-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)