Skip to main content

Burglary in a Segregated City: Race of Offenders and Community of Offending

  • Chapter
The Criminal Act

Abstract

Marcus Felson’s intellectual mind is much like a shotgun blast. The pellets are all aimed in a general direction, most of them are on target and a few are dead-on in hitting the bull’s eye. The most important of those that hit their mark are his development of Routine Activities Theory (Cohen&Felson, 1979) and his integration of this theory with that of the reasoning criminal (Clarke&Felson, 1993). Routine Activity Theory postulates that a crime will take place when a motivated offender encounters a suitable target in the absence of a capable guardian (Cohen&Felson, 1979). In this chapter, we focus on the second and third component of this theory, a suitable target and capable guardians. We examine the patterns of crime committed by residential burglars in Philadelphia, who differ by race. We are concerned with whether a suitable target and guardianship are the same or different depending on the race of the offender and the dominate race of the community within which the offence occurs (Reiss, 1981).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., S Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). How do residential burglars select target areas? British Journal of Criminology, 45, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1975). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12, 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993a). Environment, routine, and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. ln R. V. Clarke S M. Felson (Eds.), Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing, pp. 259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993b). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (2008). Crime pattern theory. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., Coffey, T., Huntley, M., S Missen, C. (2000). Predicting serial killers’ home base using a decision support system. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. L., & Hill, K. Q. (1979). The criminal’s image of the city. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, J., Fernandez, J., & Morgan, F. (2009). Formal evaluation of the impact of barriers and connectors on residential burglars’ macro-level offending location choices. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offender’s decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 6, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (1993). Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory, Volume 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2008). The rational choice perspective. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Portland, OR: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T. R., & Blake, L. (2005). The effects of patrol workloads and response strength on arrests at burglary emergencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T. R. (2010). Personal Communication via Email.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, N. (1994). Are African Americans still hypersegregated? In R. Bullard, J. E. Grigsby III, & C. Lee (Eds.), Residential apartheid: The American legacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Poot, C. J., Luykx, F., Elffers, H., & Dudink, C. (2005). Hier wonen en daar plegen? Sociale grenzen en locatiekeuze. [Living here, offending there? On social boundaries and location choice]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 47, 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, J. (1991). For the color of his skin: The murder of Yusef Hakins and the Trial of Bensonhurst. New York, NY: Pharos Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1973). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press (Orig. pub. in 1899.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elffers, H., Reynald, D., Averdijk, M., Bernasco, W., & Block, R. (2008). Modelling crime flow between neighborhoods in terms of distance and of intervening opportunities. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). Table 25: Percent of offenses cleared by arrest or exceptional means: By population group, 2010. Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (1994). Crime and everyday life. London: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. Police Research Paper 98. London, England: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, K. (2013). No trial delay for shooter charged in Trayvon Martin case. The St. Augustine Record, 5 February, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J.R., Tita, G.E. & Boggess, L.N. (2009). Intergroup and intragroup violence: Is violent crime an expression of group conflict or social disorganization? Criminology, 47(2), 521–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. M., & Vernon, R. (1959). Anatomy of a metropolis. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1985). Private, parochial and public school orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In G. Suttles & M. N. Zald (Eds.), The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2011). Don’t shoot. New York, NY: St. Martins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krivo, L., Peterson, R., & Kuhl, D. (2009). Segregation, racial structures, and neighborhood violent crime. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1765–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (2011). Separate and unequal: The neighborhood gap for Blacks, Hispanics and Asians in Metropolitan America. Providence, RIL: US2010 Project, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (2011). The persistence of segregation in the metropolis: New findings from the 2010 Census. Providence, RIL: US2010 Project, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, M., & Rengert, G. F. (1995). Danger, distance, and desirability: Perceptions of inner city neighborhoods. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver, J. (1981). Criminal mobility: A review of empirical studies. In S. Hakim & G. F. Rengert (Eds.), Crime spillover. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 20–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1965). The negro ghetto: Problems and alternatives. Geographical Review, 55, 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1972). A geographic perspective of the black ghetto. In H. M. Rose (Ed.), Geography of the ghetto: Perceptions, problems, and alternatives. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Krivo, L. (2010). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettiway, L. (1982). The mobility of robbery and burglary offenders: Ghetto and non-ghetto spaces. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinderhughes, H. (1993). The anatomy of racially motivated violence in New York City: A case study of youth in southern Brooklyn. Social Problems, 40, 478–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, L. (2002). Why Is Black-White residential segregation so persistent? Evidence on three theories from migration data. Social Science Research, 31, 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H. (2001). Residential burglars and urban barriers: A quantitative spatial study of the impact of Canberra’s unique geography on residential burglary offenders, Final Report. Canberra, Australia: Criminology Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1986). Why are communities important in understanding crime? Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 8, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr., & Roth, J. (1993). Violent crime in the United States. In A. J. Reiss, Jr. & J. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F. (1989). Spatial justice and criminal victimization. Justice Quarterly, 6, 543–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F. (1997). Auto theft in central Philadelphia. In R. Homel (Ed.), Policing for prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and energy. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F. (2002). Measuring barrier effects on criminal activity. Papers of the Advanced Crime Mapping Topics Symposium, 1, 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F., & Groff, E. R. (2011). Residential burglary: How the urban environment and our lifestyles play a contributing role. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F., Lockwood, B., & McCord, E. S. (2012). The edge of the community: Drug dealing in a segregated environment. In M. A. Andresen & J. B. Kinney (Eds.), Patterns, prevention, and geometry of crime. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. F., & Wasilchick, J. (2000). Suburban burglary. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppetto, T. A. (1974). Crime and housing in a metropolitan area: A study of the patterns of residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D., Averdijk, M., Elffers, H., Bernasco, W. (2008). Do social barriers affect urban crime trips? Built Environment, 34, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. M. (1970). Development of an urban sub-system: The case of the Negro ghetto. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 60, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. M. (1972). Spatial variation of Black urban house-holds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 62, 530–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S. (1999). Recalling Yusuf Hawkins and hate that killed him. New York Times, 22 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2009). Racial stratification and the durable tangle of neighborhood inequality. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Feldmeyer, B., Harris, C., & Ulmer, J. (2011). Reassessing trends in Black violent crime, 1980–2008: Sorting out the “Hispanic Effect” in crime victimization survey offender estimates, and U.S. prisoner counts. Criminology, 49, 197–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Census of population and housing. Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Laura. (2009). Only Blacks can stop black-on-black crime. Chicago Sun-Times, 28 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, A. (2003). Black on Black crime isn’t about absence of racial pride. Tri-State Defender, 16 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, R., & Iceland, J. (2004). Hypersegregation in the twenty-first century. Demography, 41, 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 George Rengert, Brian Lockwood, and Elizabeth R. Groff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rengert, G., Lockwood, B., Groff, E.R. (2015). Burglary in a Segregated City: Race of Offenders and Community of Offending. In: Andresen, M.A., Farrell, G. (eds) The Criminal Act. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics