Skip to main content

Substantive Representation and Violence Against Women (VAW) in Pakistan

  • Chapter
Women, Political Struggles and Gender Equality in South Asia

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of the attacks that took place in the United States on 11 September 2001, and the ensuing war on terror in Afghanistan, Pakistan suddenly became a key partner to the United States of America (US). Internationally, the image of Pakistan as a fundamentalist country in general, and with its women as veiled, submissive and oppressed in particular emerged (Critelli 2010, p. 236). Prior to the US war on terror, Pakistan was already experiencing critical times due to the increased Talibanization1 of the country and a military takeover by General Pervaiz Musharaf (Rashid 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bari, F. (2009), Role and Performance Assessment of Pakistani Women Parliamentarians 2002–07. (Islamabad: PATTAN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bari, F. (2010), ‘Women Parliamentarians Challenging the Frontiers of Politics in Pakistan’, Gender Technology and Development, 14(3), 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bari, F. and Bari, S. (2008), ‘Celebrating the “Culture” of Burying Women Alive’. The News International, 3rd September 2008, available at http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=133498 accessed dated 1 February 2009.

  • Bochel, C. and Birrgs, J. (2000), ‘Do Women Make a Difference’, Politics, 20(2), 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P., Mackay, F. and McAllister, L. (2007) Women, Politics and Constitutional Change; The First Years of The National Assembly For Wales. (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2000), ‘The New Labour Women MPs in the 1997 British Parliament: Issues of Recruitment and Representation’, Women’s History Review 9(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2004a), ‘A Feminized Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons’, BjPIR (6), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2004b), New Labour Women MPs’ Women Representing Women. (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. and Krook, M. (2012), ‘Labels and Mandates in the United Kingdom’, in S. Franceschet, M. Krook and J. Piscopo (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 89–102.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Critelli, F.M. (2010), ‘Beyond the Veil in Pakistan’, Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. (2010), ‘The Gendered Dimensions of Rituals, Rules and Norms in the Chilean Congress’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 394–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S. and Piscopo, J. (2008), ‘Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation; Lessons from Argentina’, Politics and Gender (4), 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, S., Krook, M.L. and Piscopo, J. (eds) (2012), The Impact of Gender Quotas, (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A.M. (2003), ‘The Problems with Patronage: Constraints on Women’s Political Effectiveness in Uganda’, in A.M. Goetz and S. Hassim (eds) No Shortcut to Power African Women in Politics and Policy Making. (London and New York: David Phillip Cape Town) pp. 110–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, L. (2008), ‘The 2008 Elections’, Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S. (2006), ‘Numbers and Beyond; The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research’, Gender and Politics, 2(4), 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishtiaq, A. (2007), ‘The Terrorist within’, The News International 10th March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang (2008), ‘Death squad sent to eliminate me, says Yasmeen Shah’, 13th September 2008, available online at http://www.geo.tv/9-13-2008/24783.htm, date accessed 01 January 2009.

  • Jones, M. (1997), ‘Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives’, Policy Studies Journal, 25(4), 613–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Charles, N. and Davies C.A. (2009), ‘Transforming Masculinist Political Cultures’? Doing Politics in New Political Institution. Sociological Research Online, 14(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (2012), ‘Collective Identities, Institutions, Security and the State Building in Afghanistan’, in S. Franceschet, M. Krook and J. Piscopo (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas, (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 136–153.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. and Fox, R. (2011), ‘Women Candidates in Kenya’, Women and Politics 20(4), 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative, Watch (2011), Issues 38. (Islamabad: Aurat Foundation Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, A. (2011), Pakistan a Hard Country. (London: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J. (2005), Feminizing Politics. (Cambridge and Maiden: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (2003), ‘Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence’, Political Studies, 51(1), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999), ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? Contingent “Yes”’, The journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, K.C. and Langbein, L. (2009), ‘Linking Women’s Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States’, Politics and Gender, 5, 491–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, N. and Wagha, W. (2009), Performance of Women Parliamentarians in the 12th National Assembly. (Lahore: Aurat Foundation Publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumtaz, K. (1998), ‘Women in National Legislatures in Pakistan’, in F. Shaheed, S. Warraich, C. Balchin and A. Gazdar (eds), Shaping Women’s Lives; Laws, Practices and Strategies in Pakistan. (Lahore: Shirkat Gah), pp. 319–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Representation. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, S. (2010), ‘Analysing Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, A. (2008), Decent into Chaos. (London: Penguin Book Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sater, J.N. (2012), ‘Reserved Seats, Patriarchy, and Patronage in Morocco’, in S. Franceschet, M. Krook and J. Piscopo (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 72–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer, L.A. (2006), ‘Still Supermaders? Gender and Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators’, American Journal of Political Sciences, 50(3), 570–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2002), ‘Democracy on Hold in Pakistan’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S.A. (2013), ‘Women’s Contested Politics of Presence; Learning from the Experiences of Pakistani Women Politicians’, PhD Thesis (Unpublished: University of Warwick UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheed, F. (2009), ‘The Occupation of Mainstream Cultural Space in Pakistani Society by Politico-religious Parties and Groups’, paper presented in conference on ‘Extremism and Its Impact on Society: Implications for Women’ on 18–19 August, 2009. (Islamabad: NCSW Pakistan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swers, M. (2005), ‘Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Co-sponsorship Activity’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(3), 407–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. (2006), ‘The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass’. Gender and Politics, 2(4), 502–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, A.M. (2006), ‘Uganda: Agents of Change for Women’s Advancement?’ in G. Bauer and H.E. Britton (eds) Women in African Parliament. (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner), pp. 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. (2012), ‘Party Centralization and Debate Conditions in South Africa’, in S. Franceschet, M. Krook and J. Piscopo (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangnerud, L. (2000), ‘Testing the Politics of Presence: Women’s Representation in Swedish Riksdag’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2013), ‘Global and Regional Estimates of Violence Against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-partner Sexual Violence’ (Geneva 27, Switzerland, World Health Organization).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A. (2009), ‘Faith Based Politics, Enlightened Moderation and the Pakistan’s Women’s Movement’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 11(1), 225–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Shaheen Ashraf Shah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shah, S.A. (2014). Substantive Representation and Violence Against Women (VAW) in Pakistan. In: Alston, M. (eds) Women, Political Struggles and Gender Equality in South Asia. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390578_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics