Abstract
Studies on the particular characteristics and needs of women offenders (Cabinet Office: Social Exclusion Task Force, 2009; Corston Report, 2007; Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System, 2009; Women’s Justice Taskforce, 2011) have advocated a sentencing approach which acknowledges differences between the male and female sentenced populations and the differing consequential outcomes upon them. The most significant gendered variation is that a greater number of women than men in prison have been the primary caregivers for a child or children prior to their sentence. As women are one of the fastest growing populations within the prison estate, by inference, an ever-increasing number of children are affected by the imprisonment of their primary carer. Between 1995 and 2010, the female prison population more than doubled, from 1,979 to 4,236 (Ministry of Justice, 2014, Table A1.2 Offender Management Statistics Annual Tables 2013), and there was a general increase in the numbers of women sentenced for all offences, rising from 258,600 in 2002 to 299,117 in 2011 (Ministry of Justice, 2012; Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System 2011). This increase has taken place despite no corresponding increase in the volume or seriousness of female offending.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashworth, A. (2010) Sentencing and Criminal Justice. 5 th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caddie, D. and Crisp, D. (1997) Mothers in Prison. HO Research and Statistics Directorate Findings, no. 38. London: The Stationary Office.
Carlen, P. (ed.) (2002) Women and Punishment. Devon: Willan.
Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System (2009) Engendering Justice — from Policy to Practice. London: Fawcett Society.
Corston, J. (2007) The Corston Report, A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office.
Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (2011) Equal but Different? An Inspection of the Use of Alternatives to Custody for Women Offenders. A Joint Inspection by HMI Probation, HMCPSI and HMI Prisons. London: Criminal Justice Joint Inspection.
Dobash, R.P., Dobash, R.E., and Gutteridge, S. (1986) The Imprisonment of Women. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eastern, S. (2008) Dangerous Waters: Taking Account of Impact in Sentencing. Criminal Law Review 2: 105–120.
Easton, S. and Piper, C. (2008) Sentencing and Punishment, the Quest for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fielding, N. (2011) Judges and Their Work. Social Legal Studies 20: 97–115.
Gampell, L (2003) Submission in Response to the Green Paper Consultation ‘Every Child Matters’. London: Action for Prisoner’s Families.
Genders, E. and Player, E. (1987) ‘Women in prison: the treatment, the control, and the experience’. In: P. Carlen and A. Worrall (eds) Gender, Crime and Justice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Jacobson, J. and Hough, M. (2007) Mitigation: The Role of Personal Factors in Sentencing. London: Prison Reform Trust.
Judicial Appointments Committee (2012) Official Statistics 14 June 2012http://jac.judiciary.gov.uk/st atic/documents/JAC_publication_2012_06_final.pdf.
Liebling, A. and Maruna, S. (2005) The Effects of Imprisonment. Devon: Willan.
Loureiro, T. (2009) Child and Family Impact Assessments in Court: Implications for Policy and Practice. Edinburgh: Families Outside.
Lovegrove, A. (2010) The Sentencing Council, the Public’s Sense of Justice and Personal Mitigation, Criminal Law Review, 12, 906–923.
Lovegrove, A. (2011) Putting the Offender Back into Sentencing: An Empirical Study of the Public’s Understanding of Personal Mitigation. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11: 37–57.
Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative Researching Second Edition London: Sage.
Millie, A., Tombs, J. and Hough, M. (2007) Borderline Sentencing: A Comparison of Sentencers’ Decision-Making in England and Wales, and Scotland. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7:243.
Mills, A. and Codd, H. (2007) Prisoner’s Families In: Y. Jewkes (ed.) Handbook on Prisons. Devon: Willan.
Mills, A. and Codd, H. (2002) EWCA Crim 26; [2002] 2 Cr. App. R.(S.) 52 at 232–233, [12] and [15]-[17].
Ministry of Justice (2007) Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2007. London: The Stationery Office.
Ministry of Justice (2009) Statistics on Women and the Criminal Justice System, a Ministry of Justice Publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. London: Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice (2013) Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2012 Table A2.1c. London: The Stationery Office.
Ministry of Justice (2014) Population and Capacity Briefing Week Ending 14 February 2014. London: The Stationery Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ prison-population-figures-2014.
Minson, S. (2012) Mitigating Motherhood — A Study of the Impact of Motherhood on Sentencing Decisions in England and Wales. Guildford: University of Surrey.
Minson, S. (2014) Mitigating Motherhood. London: Howard League.
Piper, C. (2007) Should Impact Constitute Mitigation? Structured Discretion Versus Mercy? Criminal Law Review, (1) 141–155.
Prison Reform Trust (2010) Bromley Briefings Prison Factfile: December 2010. http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/O/ Documents/FactfileDec 10small.pdf.
Roberts J. (2008) Aggravating and Mitigating Factors at Sentencing: Towards Greater Consistency of Application. Criminal Law Review, (4) 264–276.
Roberts J., Hough, M. and Ashworth, A. (2011) Personal Mitigation, Public Opinion and Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales 2011. Criminal Law Review, (7) 524–530.
Sentencing Advisory Panel (2009) Overarching Principles of Sentencing — Advice to the Sentencing Guidelines Council. http://www.banksr.co.uk/images/Guidelines/Advisory%20Panel%20Advice%20to%20the%20Council/Overaching_princi-ples_of_sentencing.pdf
Silverman, D. (2010) Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Social Exclusion Unit (2002) Reducing Reoffending by Ex-Prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
Social Exclusion Task Force (2009) Short Study on Women Offenders. London: Cabinet Office http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www. cabi-netoffice.gov.uk/media/209663/setf_shortstudy_womenoffenders.pdf.
Sykes, G. (1958) Society of Captives: A Study of Maximum Security Prisons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tombs, J., and Jagger, E. (2006) Denying Responsibility: Sentencers’ Accounts of Their Decisions to Imprison. British Journal of Criminology, 46: 803–821.
Wasik, M. (2001) Emmins on Sentencing, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilks-Wiffen, S. (2011) Voice of a Child. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.
Women’s Justice Taskforce (2011) Reforming Women’s Justice. London: Prison Reform Trust. http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/O/Documents/Women’s%20Justice%20Taskforce%20Report.pdf.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Shona Minson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minson, S. (2015). Sentencing and Dependents: Motherhood as Mitigation. In: Roberts, J.V. (eds) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48259-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39040-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)