Abstract
Sentencing consistency, or the extent to which like cases are treated alike, is a fundamental principle of justice. It generates transparency and predictability in sentencing practices, enhances public confidence in sentencing (Council of Europe, 1993) and helps promote the legitimacy of the criminal justice system (Roberts and Plesnicar, 2015). However, the means by which this consistency in sentencing may be achieved is far from clear-cut and highly controversial.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J., Kling, J. and Stith, K. (1999) Measuring Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Journal of Law & Economics, 42: 271–307.
Anderson, A. and Spohn, C. (2010) Lawlessness in the Federal Sentencing Process: A Test for Uniformity and Consistency in Sentence Outcomes, Justice Quarterly, 27:362–393.
Ashworth, A., and Roberts, J. (2013) The origins and nature of the sentencing guidelines in England and Wales. In: A. Ashworth and J.V. Roberts (eds) Sentencing Guidelines. Exploring the English Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellman, R. E. (1961) Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Council of Europe (1993) Consistency in Sentencing. Legal Issues, 92. http://book.coe.int/EN/ficheouvrage.php?PAGEID=36&=EN&produit_aliasid=809.
Frankel, M. (1972) Lawlessness in Sentencing. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 41(1):1.
Frase, R.S. (2005) Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota, 1978–2003. Crime and Justice, 32: 131–219.
Kramer, J. and Ulmer, J. (2002) Downward Departures for Serious Violent Offenders: Local Court ‘Conections’ to Pennsylvania’s Sentencing Guidelines. Criminology, 40: 807–932.
Mason, T, de Silva, N., Sharma, N., Brown, D. and Harper, G. (2007) Local Variation in Sentencing in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission (2012) Sentencing Practices: Controlled Substance Offenses Sentenced in 2010. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2013/other/130860.pdf.
Oregon Criminal Sentencing Commission (2003) Sentencing Practices: Summary Statistics for Felony Offenders Sentenced in 2001. http://www.oregon.gov/CJC/docs/SGO lv2.pdf.
Pina-Sanchez, J, and Linacre, R. (2013) Sentence Consistency in England and Wales: Evidence from the Crown Court Sentencing Survey. British Journal of Criminology, 53: 1118–1138.
Pina-Sanchez, J, and Linacre, R. (2014) Impact of the 2011 England and Wales Assault Guidelines. Available from authors.
Roberts, J. (2013) Complying with sentencing guidelines: latest findings from the Crown Court Sentencing Survey. In: A. Ashworth and J.V. Roberts, (eds) Sentencing Guidelines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, J.V. and Bradford, B. (2015) Sentence Reductions for a Guilty Plea: New Empirical Evidence from England and Wales. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, in press.
Roberts, J. and Plesnicar, M. (2015) Legitimacy and the Sentencing Process. In: G. Meszko and J. Tankebe (eds) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice in Europe. Amsterdam: Springer.
Sentencing Commission Working Group (2008) Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: An Evolutionary Approach. London: SCWG.
Sentencing Council (2012) Crown Court Sentencing Survey: Annual Publication, 2011. http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/CCSS_Annual_2011.pdf.
Sentencing Guidelines Council (2007) Sentence Reductions for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. London: Sentencing Guidelines Council.
Scott, R. (2010) Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look, Express, http://works.bepress.com/ryan_scott/2/.
Tarling, R. (2006) Sentencing Practice in Magistrates’ Courts Revisited. The Howard Journal, 45:29–41.
Tonry M. H. (1987) Sentencing Reform Impacts. Rockville: National Institute of Justice.
Ulmer, J., Light, M. and Kramer, J. (2011) The ‘Liberation’ of Federal Judges’ Discretion in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision: Is There Increased Disparity and Divergence between Courts? Justice Quarterly, 28: 799–837.
von Hirsch, A., Ashworth, A., Roberts, J. (2009) Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy. Portland: Hart Publishing.
Walker, S., Spohn, C. and Delone, M. (2007) The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Jose Pina-Sánchez
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pina-Sánchez, J. (2015). Defining and Measuring Consistency in Sentencing. In: Roberts, J.V. (eds) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137390400_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48259-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39040-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)