Skip to main content
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

As the“Arab Springof 2011 Began to unfold, especially when it reached Cairo, questions immediately began to be posed about its course. Did the movement have staying power? Was the world witnessing something historic, a regime thought to be impregnable on the verge of collapse? What about the countryside? Was there sufficient antiregime sentiment there or not, or could Cairo and Alexandria do it alone? Further, what if the regime, in an effort to stay in power, made concessions such as a new constitution, real elections, and representative government for the first time—should these be accepted or not? But was it really about reforming the regime or getting rid of it? And of course, there was the military: whose side would it take, and could it be won over to regime change? Last, and not least important, was there a leadership with a program prepared to rule in the name of the movement? Not for the first time were such questions posed, mutatis mutandis, when that far-too-infrequent moment occurred—the masses making history. Nor will it be the last.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 7 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1977), pp. 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Orlando Figes, A People’s Tragedy: A History of the Russian Revolution (New York: Viking, 1996), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a general overview of the 1905 Revolution, see Sidney Harcave, First Blood: The Russian Revolution of 1905 (New York: MacMillan, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. As far as I can tell, it was Mary-Alice Waters who first pointed out in print Lenin’s disagreement with Engels in her “The Workers’ and Farmers’ Government: A Popular Revolutionary Dictatorship,” New International 1, no. 3 (1984): 44–45, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In what purports to be a definitive treatment of Lenin’s usage of the phrase, Hal Draper’s The “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” from, Marx to Lenin (New York: Monthly Review, 1987), no mention of his correction to Engels is made.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Alfred Levin, The Second Duma: A Study of the Social-Democratic Party and the Russian Constitutional Experiment (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1940), pp. 7–10, for details.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For corroborating evidence from a fellow Bolshevik about how broadly the “elective principle” was applied in the new setting, see Lars Litis “Fortunes of a Formula: From ‘DEMOCRATIC Centralism to ‘democratic CENTRALISM,’” John Riddell, Marxist Essays and Commentary (blog), April 14, 2013, http://johnriddell.wordpress.com/2013/04/l4/fortunes-of-a-formula-from-democratic-centralism-to-democratic-centralism.

    Google Scholar 

  8. see Robert Service, Lenin: A Political Life, vol. 1 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For more sources for Lenin’s about-face, see J. L. H. Keep, “Russian Social-Democracy and the First State Duma,” Slavonic & East European Review 34, no. 82 (December 1955): 198n90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tony Cliff, Building the Party: Lenin 1893–1914 (Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2002), p. 218, says “we” was a minority of one: Lenin.

    Google Scholar 

  11. According to Alan Woods, Bolshevism, the Road to Revolution: A History of the Bolshevik Party from the Early Beginnings to the October Revolution (London: Wellred Publications, 1999), p. 276, the Mensheviks “originally refused to participate in elections, but then changed their position to one of a ‘semi-boycott.’”

    Google Scholar 

  12. For photos of the RSDLP Duma deputies in the First and Second Dumas, see A. J. Sack, The Birth of the Russian Democracy (New York: Russian Information Bureau, 1918), pp. 147–48 and 153–55, respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geoffrey A. Hosking, The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 August H. Nimtz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nimtz, A.H. (2014). “The Dress Rehearsal” and the First Duma. In: Lenin’s Electoral Strategy from Marx and Engels through the Revolution of 1905. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389961_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics